• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者对维生素 K 拮抗剂和直接口服抗凝剂的依从性差异。漏服几次真的那么重要吗?ACO-MEMS 研究。

Differences between patient-driven adherence to vitamin K antagonists and direct oral anticoagulants. Do few missed doses matter? ACO-MEMS Study.

机构信息

Cardiology Service, Donostia University Hospital, San Sebastián, Guipúzcoa, Spain.

Cardiology Service, Donostia University Hospital, San Sebastián, Guipúzcoa, Spain; Cardiology Service, Bidasoa Hospital, Hondarribia, Guipúzcoa, Spain.

出版信息

Thromb Res. 2019 Jul;179:20-27. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2019.04.023. Epub 2019 Apr 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.thromres.2019.04.023
PMID:31075697
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Lack of INR controls might affect the adherence to direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC). The vast majority of studies that addresses adherence to anticoagulants are retrospective and based on pharmacy refill data. Our aim was to compare the adherence between vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and DOAC and to analyze the clinical relevance of non-adherence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective two-arm observational cohort study was performed in two Spanish public hospitals. Adherence was assessed by Medication Event Monitoring System. Relationship between adherence and events during follow-up and time in therapeutic range (TTR) in the VKA group were analyzed.

RESULTS

257 patients were included (132 DOAC and 125 VKA). Monitoring time was 120 days (101-133). Patients in VKA group showed higher taking adherence (97.9% vs. 95.8%) and less non-adherent patients of >5% and >10% of the doses, without differences in >20% of the doses. Taking adherence was strongly associated with TTR (AUC: 0.89, CI 95%: 0.81-0.97 of TTR for detection of non-adherent patients of >10% of doses). During a follow-up of 1.8 years (1.6-2) non-adherent patients of >5% of doses presented more thromboembolic events (HR 6.1, CI95% 1.3-28.1).

CONCLUSIONS

Although adherence to oral anticoagulant therapy was excellent, it was higher to VKA than to DOAC. Time in therapeutic range was highly sensitive to few missed doses of AVK. Non-adherence of >5% of prescribed doses had high clinical relevance.

摘要

简介

INR 控制不足可能会影响直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)的依从性。绝大多数针对抗凝剂依从性的研究都是回顾性的,并且基于药房补充数据。我们的目的是比较维生素 K 拮抗剂(VKA)和 DOAC 的依从性,并分析不依从的临床相关性。

材料和方法

在两家西班牙公立医院进行了一项前瞻性、双臂观察性队列研究。通过药物事件监测系统评估依从性。分析了 VKA 组随访期间和治疗范围内时间(TTR)与事件之间的关系。

结果

共纳入 257 例患者(132 例 DOAC 和 125 例 VKA)。监测时间为 120 天(101-133 天)。VKA 组患者的服药依从性更高(97.9%比 95.8%),不依从率为>5%和>10%的患者更少,但>20%的剂量不依从率无差异。服药依从性与 TTR 密切相关(AUC:TTR 检测>10%剂量不依从患者的 0.89,95%CI:0.81-0.97)。在 1.8 年(1.6-2 年)的随访期间,>5%剂量不依从的患者发生血栓栓塞事件的风险更高(HR 6.1,95%CI95%1.3-28.1)。

结论

尽管口服抗凝治疗的依从性很好,但 VKA 的依从性高于 DOAC。治疗范围内的时间对 AVK 漏服几次剂量非常敏感。不依从>5%的规定剂量具有重要的临床意义。

相似文献

1
Differences between patient-driven adherence to vitamin K antagonists and direct oral anticoagulants. Do few missed doses matter? ACO-MEMS Study.患者对维生素 K 拮抗剂和直接口服抗凝剂的依从性差异。漏服几次真的那么重要吗?ACO-MEMS 研究。
Thromb Res. 2019 Jul;179:20-27. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2019.04.023. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
2
[Time in therapeutic range (TTR) and follow-up of patients on vitamin K antagonist: A cohort analysis].[维生素K拮抗剂治疗患者的治疗范围内时间(TTR)及随访:一项队列分析]
J Med Vasc. 2018 May;43(3):155-162. doi: 10.1016/j.jdmv.2018.02.001. Epub 2018 Mar 17.
3
Effect of Previous INR Control during VKA Therapy on Subsequent DOAC Adherence and Persistence, in Patients Switched from VKA to DOAC.华法林治疗期间既往 INR 控制对接受华法林转换为 DOAC 治疗的患者随后 DOAC 依从性和持续性的影响。
Thromb Haemost. 2024 Aug;124(8):778-790. doi: 10.1055/a-2168-9378. Epub 2023 Sep 6.
4
Vitamin K antagonists in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: appropriateness and quality of treatment in an Italian cohort.非瓣膜性心房颤动患者的维生素 K 拮抗剂:意大利队列中的适宜性和治疗质量。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2013 Jul;14(7):534-40. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e32835dbd58.
5
Direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in real-world patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. The FANTASIIA study.真实世界中非瓣膜性心房颤动患者使用直接口服抗凝剂与维生素K拮抗剂的比较。FANTASIIA研究。
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2020 Jan;73(1):14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2019.02.021. Epub 2019 May 31.
6
Periprocedural anticoagulation during left atrial ablation: interrupted and uninterrupted vitamin K-antagonists or uninterrupted novel anticoagulants.左心房消融术中的围手术期抗凝:间断和不间断使用维生素K拮抗剂或不间断使用新型抗凝剂。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018 Apr 27;18(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12872-018-0804-6.
7
Development of a tool to identify patients' preference for vitamin K antagonist or direct oral anticoagulant therapy.开发一种工具,以识别患者对维生素 K 拮抗剂或直接口服抗凝剂治疗的偏好。
Semin Thromb Hemost. 2014 Feb;40(1):121-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1361940. Epub 2013 Dec 31.
8
[Quality of life of elderly people on oral anticoagulant for atrial fibrillation: VKA versus direct oral anticoagulants].[口服抗凝剂治疗心房颤动的老年人的生活质量:维生素K拮抗剂与直接口服抗凝剂的比较]
Geriatr Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil. 2015 Mar;13(1):45-54. doi: 10.1684/pnv.2015.0516.
9
Comparison of Treatment Persistence with Dabigatran or Rivaroxaban versus Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation Patients: A Competing Risk Analysis in the French National Health Care Databases.比较达比加群或利伐沙班与维生素 K 拮抗剂口服抗凝剂在房颤患者中的治疗持久性:法国国家卫生保健数据库中的竞争风险分析。
Pharmacotherapy. 2018 Jan;38(1):6-18. doi: 10.1002/phar.2046. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
10
Stroke severity in patients with preceding direct oral anticoagulant therapy as compared to vitamin K antagonists.与维生素 K 拮抗剂相比,先前直接口服抗凝剂治疗的患者的卒中严重程度。
J Neurol. 2019 Sep;266(9):2263-2272. doi: 10.1007/s00415-019-09412-y. Epub 2019 Jun 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Electronic Monitoring of Medication Adherence to Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Systematic Review.直接口服抗凝剂药物依从性的电子监测:一项系统评价
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 Apr 7;19:921-939. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S505485. eCollection 2025.
2
Relationship between electronically monitored adherence to direct oral anticoagulants and ischemic or hemorrhagic events after an initial ischemic stroke-A case control study.首次缺血性卒中后电子监测的直接口服抗凝剂依从性与缺血或出血事件的关系——一项病例对照研究
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 25;19(4):e0301421. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301421. eCollection 2024.
3
Intake reminders are effective in enhancing adherence to direct oral anticoagulants in stroke patients: a randomised cross-over trial (MAAESTRO study).
摄入提醒可有效提高脑卒中患者对直接口服抗凝剂的依从性:一项随机交叉试验(MAAESTRO 研究)。
J Neurol. 2024 Feb;271(2):841-851. doi: 10.1007/s00415-023-12035-z. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
4
Management of Patients Treated with Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Clinical Practice and Challenging Scenarios.临床实践及复杂情况下接受直接口服抗凝剂治疗患者的管理
J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 13;12(18):5955. doi: 10.3390/jcm12185955.
5
Adherence to Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Cross-National Comparison in Six European Countries (2008-2015).非瓣膜性心房颤动患者对直接口服抗凝剂的依从性:六个欧洲国家的跨国比较(2008 - 2015年)
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Nov 3;12:682890. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.682890. eCollection 2021.
6
Venous thrombosis recurrence risk according to warfarin versus direct oral anticoagulants for the secondary prevention of venous thrombosis.华法林与直接口服抗凝剂用于静脉血栓形成二级预防时的静脉血栓复发风险
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2021 Aug 17;5(6):e12575. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12575. eCollection 2021 Aug.
7
Cost-effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonist in atrial fibrillation: A study protocol using Real-World Data from Catalonia (FantasTIC Study).直接口服抗凝剂与维生素K拮抗剂治疗心房颤动的成本效益:一项使用加泰罗尼亚真实世界数据的研究方案(FantasTIC研究)。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Sep 4;99(36):e22054. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022054.
8
Impact of oral anticoagulation choice on healthcare utilization for the primary treatment of venous thromboembolism.口服抗凝药物选择对静脉血栓栓塞症初级治疗的医疗保健利用的影响。
Vasc Med. 2020 Dec;25(6):549-556. doi: 10.1177/1358863X20940388. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
9
Satisfaction, quality of life and therapy adherence assessment in real life patients transitioning from vitamin K antagonists to direct oral anticoagulants.从维生素K拮抗剂转换为直接口服抗凝剂的真实生活患者的满意度、生活质量和治疗依从性评估
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2020 Oct;50(3):718-723. doi: 10.1007/s11239-020-02070-2.