Suppr超能文献

脆弱 tipping 点:确定烧伤人群中哪些患者是干预的目标。

The frailty tipping point: Determining which patients are targets for intervention in a burn population.

机构信息

University of California, Davis, Department of Surgery, Division of Burn Surgery, United States.

University of California, Davis, Department of Surgery, United States.

出版信息

Burns. 2019 Aug;45(5):1051-1056. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2018.11.003. Epub 2019 May 10.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Elderly burn patients vary in physiologic age and frailty. While previous evidence suggests that frailty on admission is associated with poor outcomes, changes in frailty during hospitalization for a burn injury have not been reported.

METHODS

We performed a two-year retrospective review of all elderly (≥65years) burn-patients admitted to our burn center. Patients who died during admission were excluded. Data collected include: demographics, injury characteristics, outcomes, and discharge disposition. Canadian Study on Health and Aging Clinical Frailty Scores (CFS) were calculated on admission and at discharge. Change in frailty was calculated for each patient. Mean values are represented as mean±standard deviation, median values are represented as median (IQR).

RESULTS

Seventy-nine patients, mean age of 75±8years, with a mean admission CFS was 4.3±1.2 and discharge CFS was 5.1±1.2 were included in the study. The mean change in CFS was -0.55±0.93. Forty-six patients (59%) had no change or an improvement in frailty during hospitalization while 32 (41%) had worsened CFS at discharge. Patients whose CFS was worse at discharge had larger burns (12.8±10.7% vs. 6.28±5.7%), lower admission CFS (3.88±1.5 vs. 4.93±1.0), and longer ICU stays (15.6±18.9 vs. 7.64± 10.6 days) than patients without change in CFS. On multivariate regression analysis TBSA (OR 1.2 (1.07-1.3)) and admission CFS of 1-4 (OR 7.9 (2.2-28)) were significant predictors of worsened CFS at discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study population, patients with low admission frailty scores are at greatest risk for worsened frailty at discharge and should be targeted for the development of future frailty prevention programs.

摘要

目的

老年烧伤患者在生理年龄和脆弱性方面存在差异。虽然先前的证据表明入院时的脆弱性与不良结局相关,但烧伤住院期间的脆弱性变化尚未报道。

方法

我们对我院烧伤中心收治的所有老年(≥65 岁)烧伤患者进行了为期两年的回顾性研究。排除入院期间死亡的患者。收集的数据包括:人口统计学、损伤特征、结局和出院去向。入院时和出院时计算加拿大健康与老龄化研究临床虚弱评分(CFS)。每位患者的虚弱程度变化均进行计算。平均值表示为平均值±标准差,中位数表示为中位数(IQR)。

结果

本研究共纳入 79 例患者,平均年龄 75±8 岁,入院时 CFS 平均为 4.3±1.2,出院时 CFS 平均为 5.1±1.2。CFS 的平均变化为-0.55±0.93。46 例(59%)患者在住院期间虚弱程度无变化或改善,32 例(41%)患者出院时 CFS 恶化。出院时 CFS 较差的患者烧伤面积较大(12.8±10.7% vs. 6.28±5.7%),入院时 CFS 较低(3.88±1.5 vs. 4.93±1.0),ICU 入住时间较长(15.6±18.9 vs. 7.64±10.6 天)。多变量回归分析显示,TBSA(OR 1.2(1.07-1.3))和入院时 CFS 为 1-4(OR 7.9(2.2-28))是出院时 CFS 恶化的显著预测因素。

结论

在我们的研究人群中,入院时虚弱评分较低的患者出院时虚弱恶化的风险最高,应作为未来虚弱预防计划的目标人群。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验