• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民社区的精准医学研究:与部落领袖进行审议性接触的结果。

Precision medicine research with American Indian and Alaska Native communities: Results of a deliberative engagement with tribal leaders.

机构信息

Department of Bioethics and Humanities, UW School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.

Department of Bioethics and Humanities, UW School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.

出版信息

Genet Med. 2022 Mar;24(3):622-630. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2021.11.003. Epub 2021 Nov 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.gim.2021.11.003
PMID:34906504
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9754657/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Amid calls for greater diversity in precision medicine research, the perspectives of Indigenous people have been underexplored. Our goals were to understand tribal leaders' views regarding the potential benefits and risks of such research, explore its priority for their communities, and identify the policies and safeguards they consider essential. This article reports on the participants' perspectives regarding governance and policy, stewardship and sharing of information and biospecimens, and informed consent.

METHODS

After informal local dialogs with 21 tribal leaders, we convened a 2.5-day deliberation with tribal leaders (N = 10) in Anchorage, Alaska, in June 2019 using a combination of small group and plenary discussion, ranking, and voting exercises to explore the perspectives on precision medicine research.

RESULTS

Tribal sovereignty was central to participants' ideas about precision medicine research. Although views were generally positive, provided that the appropriate controls were in place, some kinds of research were deemed unacceptable, and the collection of certain biospecimens was rejected by some participants. Differences were observed regarding the acceptability of broad consent.

CONCLUSION

Tribal leaders in this study were generally supportive of precision medicine research, with the caveat that tribal oversight is essential for the establishment of research repositories and the conduct of research involving Indigenous participants.

摘要

目的

在呼吁增加精准医学研究多样性的背景下,原住民的观点尚未得到充分探索。我们的目标是了解部落领袖对这类研究的潜在益处和风险的看法,探讨其对社区的优先性,并确定他们认为至关重要的政策和保障措施。本文报告了参与者对治理和政策、信息和生物样本的管理和共享以及知情同意的看法。

方法

在与 21 位部落领袖进行非正式的当地对话之后,我们于 2019 年 6 月在阿拉斯加安克雷奇举行了为期两天半的部落领袖会议(N=10),采用小组讨论和全体讨论、排名和投票练习相结合的方式,探讨了对精准医学研究的看法。

结果

部落主权是参与者对精准医学研究的核心观点。尽管观点普遍是积极的,但前提是要有适当的控制措施,一些类型的研究被认为是不可接受的,而一些参与者则拒绝收集某些生物样本。对于广泛同意的可接受性存在差异。

结论

本研究中的部落领袖普遍支持精准医学研究,但前提是必须进行部落监督,以建立研究资料库并开展涉及原住民参与者的研究。

相似文献

1
Precision medicine research with American Indian and Alaska Native communities: Results of a deliberative engagement with tribal leaders.美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民社区的精准医学研究:与部落领袖进行审议性接触的结果。
Genet Med. 2022 Mar;24(3):622-630. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2021.11.003. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
2
Tribal Deliberations about Precision Medicine Research: Addressing Diversity and Inequity in Democratic Deliberation Design and Evaluation.部落对精准医学研究的审议:在民主审议设计和评估中解决多样性和不平等问题。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2022 Jul;17(3):304-316. doi: 10.1177/15562646221081267. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
3
Deliberations with American Indian and Alaska Native People about the Ethics of Genomics: An Adapted Model of Deliberation Used with Three Tribal Communities in the United States.与美洲印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民就基因组学伦理进行的审议:在美国三个部落社区使用的审议模型的改编版。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2021 Jul-Sep;12(3):164-178. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2021.1925775. Epub 2021 Jun 14.
4
Urban American Indian and Alaska Native Data Sovereignty: Ethical Issues.城市美洲印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民数据主权:伦理问题。
Am Indian Alsk Native Ment Health Res. 2021;28(2):77-97. doi: 10.5820/aian.2802.2021.77.
5
Tobacco Industry Promotional Strategies Targeting American Indians/Alaska Natives and Exploiting Tribal Sovereignty.烟草业针对美洲印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民的促销策略利用部落主权。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2019 Jun 21;21(7):940-948. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nty048.
6
Community Perspectives on Communicating About Precision Medicine in an Alaska Native Tribal Health Care System.阿拉斯加原住民部落医疗保健系统中关于精准医学沟通的社区观点。
Front Commun (Lausanne). 2020 Sep;5. doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2020.00070. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
7
Access to Lung Cancer Screening Among American Indian and Alaska Native Adults: A Qualitative Study.美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民成年人的肺癌筛查情况:一项定性研究。
Chest. 2024 Mar;165(3):716-724. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2023.10.025. Epub 2023 Oct 28.
8
Extending Research Protections to Tribal Communities.将研究保护范围扩大到部落社区。
Am J Bioeth. 2021 Oct;21(10):5-12. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1865477. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
9
Tribal IRBs: A Framework for Understanding Research Oversight in American Indian and Alaska Native Communities.部落机构审查委员会:理解美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民社区研究监督的框架。
Am Indian Alsk Native Ment Health Res. 2019;26(2):71-95. doi: 10.5820/aian.2602.2019.71.
10
Reducing risk for gestational diabetes among American Indian and Alaska Native teenagers: Tribal leaders' recommendations.降低美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民青少年妊娠糖尿病风险:部落领袖的建议。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021 Nov;155(2):195-200. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13849. Epub 2021 Aug 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Trusted partners, community priorities, and data protections: requirements for precision medicine research with Alaska Native peoples.值得信赖的合作伙伴、社区优先事项和数据保护:阿拉斯加原住民精准医学研究的要求。
J Community Genet. 2025 Mar 3. doi: 10.1007/s12687-025-00779-2.
2
A 4-Site Public Deliberation Project on the Acceptability of Youth Self-Consent in Biomedical HIV Prevention Trials: Assessment of Facilitator Fidelity to Key Principles.一项关于生物医学艾滋病毒预防试验中青少年自主同意可接受性的四地点公众审议项目:评估促进者对关键原则的忠诚度。
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Feb 13;9:e58451. doi: 10.2196/58451.
3
Implementing community-engaged pharmacogenomics in Indigenous communities.在原住民社区实施社区参与式药物基因组学。
Nat Commun. 2024 Jan 31;15(1):920. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-45032-5.
4
Assessing Facilitator Fidelity to Principles of Public Deliberation: Tutorial.评估促进者对公众审议原则的忠实度:教程。
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Dec 13;7:e51202. doi: 10.2196/51202.
5
Consideration and Disclosure of Group Risks in Genomics and Other Data-Centric Research: Does the Common Rule Need Revision?基因组学及其他以数据为中心的研究中群体风险的考量与披露:《通用规则》是否需要修订?
Am J Bioeth. 2025 Feb;25(2):47-60. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2276161. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
6
Beyond the Individual: Community-Centric Approaches to Increase Diversity in Biomedical Research.超越个体:以社区为中心增加生物医学研究多样性的方法。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2023 Mar;113(3):509-517. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2808. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
7
Communicating Precision Medicine Research: Multidisciplinary Teams and Diverse Communities.精准医学研究的沟通:多学科团队与多元群体
Public Health Genomics. 2022 Aug 23:1-9. doi: 10.1159/000525684.
8
Ethical Guidance in Human Paleogenomics: New and Ongoing Perspectives.人类古基因组学中的伦理指导:新观点与持续观点
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2022 Aug 31;23:627-652. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-120621-090239. Epub 2022 May 10.
9
Tribal Deliberations about Precision Medicine Research: Addressing Diversity and Inequity in Democratic Deliberation Design and Evaluation.部落对精准医学研究的审议:在民主审议设计和评估中解决多样性和不平等问题。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2022 Jul;17(3):304-316. doi: 10.1177/15562646221081267. Epub 2022 Feb 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Deliberations with American Indian and Alaska Native People about the Ethics of Genomics: An Adapted Model of Deliberation Used with Three Tribal Communities in the United States.与美洲印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民就基因组学伦理进行的审议:在美国三个部落社区使用的审议模型的改编版。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2021 Jul-Sep;12(3):164-178. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2021.1925775. Epub 2021 Jun 14.
2
Alaska Native genomic research: perspectives from Alaska Native leaders, federal staff, and biomedical researchers.阿拉斯加原住民基因组研究:阿拉斯加原住民领袖、联邦工作人员和生物医学研究人员的观点。
Genet Med. 2020 Dec;22(12):1935-1943. doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-0926-y. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
3
Health Disparities Research with American Indian Communities: The Importance of Trust and Transparency.美国印第安人社区的健康差异研究:信任和透明度的重要性。
Am J Community Psychol. 2020 Dec;66(3-4):302-313. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12445. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
4
Rights, interests and expectations: Indigenous perspectives on unrestricted access to genomic data.权利、利益和期望:关于无限制获取基因组数据的原住民观点。
Nat Rev Genet. 2020 Jun;21(6):377-384. doi: 10.1038/s41576-020-0228-x. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
5
An Integrative Review of the Barriers to Indigenous Peoples Participation in Biobanking and Genomic Research.关于原住民参与生物样本库和基因组研究障碍的综合综述。
JCO Glob Oncol. 2020 Mar;6:83-91. doi: 10.1200/JGO.18.00156.
6
Access and Management: Indigenous Perspectives on Genomic Data Sharing.获取和管理:基因组数据共享的本土视角。
Ethn Dis. 2019 Dec 12;29(Suppl 3):659-668. doi: 10.18865/ed.29.S3.659. eCollection 2019.
7
Genome-wide Association Studies in Ancestrally Diverse Populations: Opportunities, Methods, Pitfalls, and Recommendations.全基因组关联研究在遗传背景多样化的人群中的应用:机遇、方法、陷阱和建议。
Cell. 2019 Oct 17;179(3):589-603. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.08.051. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
8
Community Protections in American Indian and Alaska Native Participatory Research-A Scoping Review.美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民参与性研究中的社区保护——一项范围综述
Soc Sci (Basel). 2019 Apr;8(4). doi: 10.3390/socsci8040127. Epub 2019 Apr 20.
9
Beyond the Belmont Principles: A Community-Based Approach to Developing an Indigenous Ethics Model and Curriculum for Training Health Researchers Working with American Indian and Alaska Native Communities.超越贝尔蒙原则:以社区为基础制定培训与美洲印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民社区合作的卫生研究人员的土著伦理模式和课程。
Am J Community Psychol. 2019 Sep;64(1-2):9-20. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12360. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
10
Overvaluing individual consent ignores risks to tribal participants.过分强调个人同意会忽视部落参与者的风险。
Nat Rev Genet. 2019 Sep;20(9):497-498. doi: 10.1038/s41576-019-0161-z. Epub 2019 Jul 15.