• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

依赖成性还是盲目自信?一项关于对外界帮助反应的实验研究。

Conveniently dependent or naively overconfident? An experimental study on the reaction to external help.

机构信息

Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.

School of Economics, and the Center of Yellow River Civilization and Sustainable Development, Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan Province 475001, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 May 13;14(5):e0216617. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216617. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0216617
PMID:31083705
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6513094/
Abstract

The rapid development and diffusion of new technologies such as automation and artificial intelligence makes life more convenient. At the same time, people may develop overdependence on technology to simplify everyday tasks or to reduce the level of effort required to accomplish them. We conduct a two-phase real-effort laboratory experiment to assess how external assistance affects subsequent revealed preferences for the convenience of a lower level of effort versus monetary rewards requiring greater effort. The results suggest that men treated with external help in the first phase tend to choose more difficult options with potentially higher monetary rewards. In contrast, after being treated with external help, women exhibit a stronger propensity to utilize the convenience of an easier task and are less likely to choose a more difficult option that carries higher potential earnings.

摘要

新技术(如自动化和人工智能)的快速发展和普及使生活更加便利。与此同时,人们可能会过度依赖技术来简化日常任务,或者减少完成任务所需的努力程度。我们进行了一项两阶段的真实努力实验室实验,以评估外部帮助如何影响随后对低努力水平的便利性与需要更大努力的金钱奖励的显示偏好。结果表明,第一阶段接受外部帮助的男性往往会选择更困难的选项,这些选项可能有更高的金钱奖励。相比之下,接受外部帮助后,女性表现出更强的利用简单任务便利性的倾向,不太可能选择更困难的选项,尽管这些选项可能带来更高的潜在收益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74f1/6513094/5ff7f54e8622/pone.0216617.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74f1/6513094/214f9d5961ec/pone.0216617.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74f1/6513094/b5567c4db11f/pone.0216617.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74f1/6513094/7a8e803e2bf5/pone.0216617.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74f1/6513094/8d2621215547/pone.0216617.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74f1/6513094/a171bbfd0d42/pone.0216617.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74f1/6513094/5ff7f54e8622/pone.0216617.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74f1/6513094/214f9d5961ec/pone.0216617.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74f1/6513094/b5567c4db11f/pone.0216617.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74f1/6513094/7a8e803e2bf5/pone.0216617.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74f1/6513094/8d2621215547/pone.0216617.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74f1/6513094/a171bbfd0d42/pone.0216617.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74f1/6513094/5ff7f54e8622/pone.0216617.g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Conveniently dependent or naively overconfident? An experimental study on the reaction to external help.依赖成性还是盲目自信?一项关于对外界帮助反应的实验研究。
PLoS One. 2019 May 13;14(5):e0216617. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216617. eCollection 2019.
2
Risky effort.冒险的努力。
Cognition. 2024 Oct;251:105895. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105895. Epub 2024 Jul 20.
3
Effect of social influence on effort-allocation for monetary rewards.社会影响对金钱奖励下努力分配的作用。
PLoS One. 2015 May 11;10(5):e0126656. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126656. eCollection 2015.
4
Computational Dissection of Dopamine Motor and Motivational Functions in Humans.人类多巴胺运动和动机功能的计算剖析
J Neurosci. 2016 Jun 22;36(25):6623-33. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3078-15.2016.
5
The cognitive effort expenditure for rewards task (C-EEfRT): A novel measure of willingness to expend cognitive effort.奖赏认知努力任务(C-EEfRT):一种衡量意愿付出认知努力的新方法。
Psychol Assess. 2018 Sep;30(9):1237-1248. doi: 10.1037/pas0000563. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
6
Altered subjective reward valuation among female heavy marijuana users.女性重度大麻使用者主观奖励评估的改变。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2017 Feb;25(1):1-12. doi: 10.1037/pha0000101. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
7
Determinants of justification and self-control.正当性与自我控制的决定因素。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2006 Nov;135(4):572-87. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.135.4.572.
8
The relationship between addiction and reward bundling: an experiment comparing smokers and non-smokers.成瘾与奖励捆绑的关系:比较吸烟者和非吸烟者的实验。
Addiction. 2011 Feb;106(2):402-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03166.x. Epub 2010 Oct 19.
9
Differential effects of real versus hypothetical monetary reward magnitude on risk-taking behavior and brain activity.真实与假设货币奖励大小对冒险行为和大脑活动的差异影响。
Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 27;8(1):3712. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-21820-0.
10
I endeavor to make it: effort increases valuation of subsequent monetary reward.我努力做到这一点:付出努力会增加对后续金钱奖励的重视程度。
Behav Brain Res. 2014 Mar 15;261:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.11.045. Epub 2013 Dec 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Testing for altruism and social pressure in charitable giving.测试慈善捐赠中的利他主义和社会压力。
Q J Econ. 2012;127(1):1-56. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjr050.
2
Contingencies of self-worth in college students: theory and measurement.大学生自我价值的权变因素:理论与测量
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Nov;85(5):894-908. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.894.
3
Gender and self-esteem.性别与自尊。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1992 Sep;63(3):391-402. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.63.3.391.
4
When helping hurts: effects of donor-recipient similarity and recipient self-esteem on reactions to aid.当帮助带来伤害时:捐赠者与受助者的相似性及受助者自尊对援助反应的影响。
J Pers. 1976 Sep;44(3):392-409. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1976.tb00129.x.