Rivelli Anne L, Kelly Erin H, Espino Susan Ryerson, Vogel Lawrence C
Shriners Hospitals for Children , Chicago , Illinois , USA.
American Academy of Pediatrics , Itasca , Illinois , USA.
J Spinal Cord Med. 2019 Sep;42(5):545-556. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2019.1609873. Epub 2019 May 14.
Describe development, implementation, review, and redesign of a hospital-based, in-person psychoeducational intervention for caregivers of youth with spinal cord injury (SCI) ages 7-17. Process evaluation/case study to describe intervention development, as well as preliminary evaluation data. Pediatric specialty hospital. 41 caregivers of youth with SCI. Caregivers attended an in-person intervention ("Parent Forum"), after which they were randomized into two groups: one received monthly phone calls from a mental health professional and the other services as usual. Caregivers were invited to attend a second Parent Forum one year later. The current paper focuses solely on the Parent Forum components. Caregiver problem solving, study-specific satisfaction questions, and qualitative focus groups. After consulting with multiple stakeholders (including caregivers, clinicians, and researchers), the first Parent Forum was designed to focus on caregiver health/well-being. While caregivers from Parent Forum I reported greater positive problem solving and relatively high satisfaction scores, they also reported wanting more time together and more discussion of their children's health. We redesigned Parent Forum II to incorporate this feedback which yielded positive results, particularly during focus groups. The purpose of this manuscript was to share our development process to inform other teams engaged in intervention design for this or similar populations. Our experience emphasized the need to not only involve multiple stakeholders, but to pilot test intervention components, and be open to modifying them after receiving participant feedback. The final intervention model yielded positive reactions, but also emphasized the need for ongoing caregiver support.
描述针对7至17岁脊髓损伤(SCI)青少年照料者的一项基于医院的面对面心理教育干预措施的开发、实施、评估和重新设计。通过过程评估/案例研究来描述干预措施的开发以及初步评估数据。儿科专科医院。41名脊髓损伤青少年的照料者。照料者参加了一次面对面干预(“家长论坛”),之后他们被随机分为两组:一组每月接受心理健康专业人员的电话随访,另一组则照常接受服务。一年后,照料者被邀请参加第二次家长论坛。本文仅关注家长论坛的组成部分。照料者解决问题的情况、针对该研究的满意度问题以及定性焦点小组。在与多个利益相关者(包括照料者、临床医生和研究人员)协商后,第一次家长论坛旨在关注照料者的健康/幸福。虽然第一次家长论坛的照料者报告了更强的积极解决问题能力和相对较高的满意度得分,但他们也报告希望有更多时间聚在一起,更多地讨论孩子的健康问题。我们重新设计了第二次家长论坛以纳入这些反馈,这产生了积极的结果,尤其是在焦点小组中。本文的目的是分享我们的开发过程,为其他针对此类或类似人群进行干预设计的团队提供参考。我们的经验强调不仅需要让多个利益相关者参与,还要对干预措施的组成部分进行试点测试,并在收到参与者反馈后愿意对其进行修改。最终的干预模式产生了积极的反应,但也强调了对照料者持续支持的必要性。