• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对猫的道德恐慌。

A moral panic over cats.

机构信息

George Perkins Marsh Institute, Clark University, 950 Main Street, Worcester, MA, 01610, U.S.A.

Francisco Santiago-Ávila, Carnivore Coexistence Lab, Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 70 Science Hall, 550 North Park Street, Madison, WI, 53706, U.S.A.

出版信息

Conserv Biol. 2019 Aug;33(4):769-776. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13346. Epub 2019 Jun 3.

DOI:10.1111/cobi.13346
PMID:31087701
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6852131/
Abstract

Some conservationists believe that free-ranging cats pose an enormous risk to biodiversity and public health and therefore should be eliminated from the landscape by any means necessary. They further claim that those who question the science or ethics behind their arguments are science deniers (merchants of doubt) seeking to mislead the public. As much as we share a commitment to conservation of biodiversity and wild nature, we believe these ideas are wrong and fuel an unwarranted moral panic over cats. Those who question the ecological or epidemiological status of cats are not science deniers, and it is a false analogy to compare them with corporate and right-wing special interests that perpetrate disinformation campaigns over issues, such as smoking and climate change. There are good conservation and public-health reasons and evidence to be skeptical that free-ranging cats constitute a disaster for biodiversity and human health in all circumstances. Further, there are significant and largely unaddressed ethical and policy issues (e.g., the ethics and efficacy of lethal management) relative to how people ought to value and coexist with cats and native wildlife. Society is better served by a collaborative approach to produce better scientific and ethical knowledge about free-ranging cats.

摘要

一些自然资源保护主义者认为,自由放养的猫对生物多样性和公共健康构成了巨大威胁,因此应通过任何必要的手段将其从景观中消除。他们进一步声称,那些质疑其论点背后的科学或伦理依据的人是科学否认者(质疑者),试图误导公众。尽管我们都致力于保护生物多样性和野生自然,但我们认为这些观点是错误的,并加剧了对猫的无端道德恐慌。那些质疑猫的生态或流行病学状况的人并不是科学否认者,将他们与在吸烟和气候变化等问题上传播虚假信息的企业和右翼特殊利益集团进行类比是错误的。在所有情况下,自由放养的猫是否对生物多样性和人类健康构成灾难,这是有充分的保护和公共卫生理由和证据值得怀疑的。此外,相对于人们应该如何重视和与猫及本地野生动物共存,还存在着重大且在很大程度上未得到解决的伦理和政策问题(例如,对猫进行致命管理的伦理和效果)。通过合作的方式来产生关于流浪猫的更好的科学和伦理知识,更有利于社会。

相似文献

1
A moral panic over cats.对猫的道德恐慌。
Conserv Biol. 2019 Aug;33(4):769-776. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13346. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
2
Challenges and opportunities in human dimensions behind cat-wildlife conflict.人与野生动物冲突背后的人文维度的挑战与机遇。
Conserv Biol. 2024 Aug;38(4):e14253. doi: 10.1111/cobi.14253. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
3
Recognizing animal personhood in compassionate conservation.在富有同情心的保护中承认动物的人格。
Conserv Biol. 2020 Oct;34(5):1097-1106. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13494. Epub 2020 May 18.
4
The virtue of compassion in compassionate conservation.在同情式保护中同情的美德。
Conserv Biol. 2022 Feb;36(1):e13776. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13776. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
5
Emotion as a source of moral understanding in conservation.情感是保护生物学中道德理解的源泉。
Conserv Biol. 2021 Oct;35(5):1380-1387. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13689. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
6
The moral residue of conservation.保护的道德残余。
Conserv Biol. 2020 Oct;34(5):1114-1121. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13463. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
7
The need for ecocentrism in biodiversity conservation.需要以生态中心主义来进行生物多样性保护。
Conserv Biol. 2020 Oct;34(5):1089-1096. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13541. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
8
Revisiting two dogmas of conservation science.重新审视保护科学的两个教条。
Conserv Biol. 2023 Aug;37(4):e14101. doi: 10.1111/cobi.14101. Epub 2023 May 25.
9
Experiencing biodiversity as a bridge over the science-society communication gap.将生物多样性体验作为弥合科学-社会交流鸿沟的桥梁。
Conserv Biol. 2014 Jun;28(3):705-12. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12222. Epub 2013 Dec 26.
10
A critical review of the compassionate conservation debate.对同情性保护辩论的批判性审视。
Conserv Biol. 2022 Feb;36(1):e13760. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13760. Epub 2021 Jun 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Using applied social science disciplines to implement creative outdoor cat management solutions and avoid the trap of one-size-fits-all policies.运用应用社会科学学科来实施创新性户外猫管理解决方案,避免陷入一刀切政策的陷阱。
Conserv Biol. 2025 Feb;39(1):e14321. doi: 10.1111/cobi.14321. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
2
Outdoor domestic cats and wildlife: How to overrate and misinterpret field data.户外家猫与野生动物:如何高估和误解实地数据。
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Dec 14;9:1087907. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.1087907. eCollection 2022.
3
Re-Thinking Felid-Human Entanglements through the Lenses of Compassionate Conservation and Multispecies Studies.通过同情式保护和多物种研究视角重新思考猫科动物与人类的纠葛
Animals (Basel). 2022 Oct 31;12(21):2996. doi: 10.3390/ani12212996.
4
Compassionate Conservation is indistinguishable from traditional forms of conservation in practice.在实践中,同情式保护与传统保护形式并无二致。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 3;13:750313. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.750313. eCollection 2022.
5
Estimating the Population of Unowned Free-Ranging Domestic Cats in Denmark Using a Combination of Questionnaires and GPS Tracking.结合问卷调查和GPS追踪估算丹麦无主散养家猫数量
Animals (Basel). 2022 Apr 4;12(7):920. doi: 10.3390/ani12070920.
6
How Serious Are Health-Related Welfare Problems in Unowned Unsocialised Domestic Cats? A Study from Denmark Based on 598 Necropsies.无主且未社会化家养猫的健康相关福利问题有多严重?一项基于598例尸检的丹麦研究。
Animals (Basel). 2022 Mar 6;12(5):662. doi: 10.3390/ani12050662.
7
Guidance for management of free-roaming community cats: a bioeconomic analysis.流浪猫管理指南:生物经济学分析
J Feline Med Surg. 2022 Oct;24(10):975-985. doi: 10.1177/1098612X211055685. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
8
Perspectives of Canadian and American Cat Owners on Provision of Uncontrolled Outdoor Access for Owned Domestic Cats.加拿大和美国养猫者对给予自家宠物猫不受限制的户外活动空间的看法。
Front Vet Sci. 2021 Oct 26;8:742245. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.742245. eCollection 2021.
9
Unanswered Questions and Hypotheses about Domestic Cat Behavior, Ecology, and the Cat-Human Relationship.关于家猫行为、生态以及猫与人类关系的未解决问题和假设。
Animals (Basel). 2021 Sep 27;11(10):2823. doi: 10.3390/ani11102823.
10
Coping With Human-Cat Interactions Beyond the Limits of Domesticity: Moral Pluralism in the Management of Cats and Wildlife.超越家庭范畴应对人与猫的互动:猫与野生动物管理中的道德多元主义
Front Vet Sci. 2021 Jun 11;8:682582. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.682582. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Rabies surveillance in the United States during 2017.2017年美国的狂犬病监测
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2018 Dec 15;253(12):1555-1568. doi: 10.2460/javma.253.12.1555.
2
On allegations of invasive species denialism.关于入侵物种否认论的指控。
Conserv Biol. 2019 Aug;33(4):797-802. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13278. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
3
Summoning compassion to address the challenges of conservation.唤起同情心以应对保护挑战。
Conserv Biol. 2018 Dec;32(6):1255-1265. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13126. Epub 2018 Jul 14.
4
Do non-native species contribute to biodiversity?非本地物种对生物多样性有贡献吗?
PLoS Biol. 2018 Apr 17;16(4):e2005568. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2005568. eCollection 2018 Apr.
5
Rabies surveillance in the United States during 2016.2016年美国的狂犬病监测
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2018 Apr 15;252(8):945-957. doi: 10.2460/javma.252.8.945.
6
Merchants of doubt in the free-ranging cat conflict.自由放养猫冲突中的怀疑论者。
Conserv Biol. 2018 Apr;32(2):265-266. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13085.
7
An Examination of an Iconic Trap-Neuter-Return Program: The Newburyport, Massachusetts Case Study.对一个标志性的诱捕-绝育-放归项目的考察:马萨诸塞州纽伯里波特的案例研究。
Animals (Basel). 2017 Oct 31;7(11):81. doi: 10.3390/ani7110081.
8
Curiosity killed the cat: no evidence of an association between cat ownership and psychotic symptoms at ages 13 and 18 years in a UK general population cohort.好奇害死猫:在英国一个普通人群队列中,没有证据表明13岁和18岁时养猫与精神症状之间存在关联。
Psychol Med. 2017 Jul;47(9):1659-1667. doi: 10.1017/S0033291717000125. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
9
Invasive predators and global biodiversity loss.入侵性捕食者与全球生物多样性丧失
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Oct 4;113(40):11261-11265. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1602480113. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
10
Compendium of Animal Rabies Prevention and Control, 2016.《2016年动物狂犬病预防控制纲要》
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2016 Mar 1;248(5):505-17. doi: 10.2460/javma.248.5.505.