Institute of Plant Breeding, Genetics and Genomics and Dep. of Crop and Soil Sci., University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602.
Soybean Genomics and Improvement Lab, USDA-ARS, Beltsville, MD 20705.
G3 (Bethesda). 2019 Jul 9;9(7):2253-2265. doi: 10.1534/g3.118.200917.
Genomic selection (GS) has become viable for selection of quantitative traits for which marker-assisted selection has often proven less effective. The potential of GS for soybean was characterized using 483 elite breeding lines, genotyped with BARCSoySNP6K iSelect BeadChips. Cross validation was performed using RR-BLUP and predictive abilities () of 0.81, 0.71, and 0.26 for protein, oil, and yield, were achieved at the largest tested training set size. Minimal differences were observed when comparing different marker densities and there appeared to be inflation in due to population structure. For comparison purposes, two additional methods to predict breeding values for lines of four bi-parental populations within the GS dataset were tested. The first method predicted within each bi-parental population (WP method) and utilized a training set of full-sibs of the validation set. The second method utilized a training set of all remaining breeding lines except for full-sibs of the validation set to predict across populations (AP method). The AP method is more practical as the WP method would likely delay the breeding cycle and leverage smaller training sets. Averaging across populations for protein and oil content, for the AP method (0.55, 0.30) approached for the WP method (0.60, 0.52). Though comparable, for yield was low for both AP and WP methods (0.12, 0.13). Based on increases in as training sets increased and the effectiveness of WP AP method, the AP method could potentially improve with larger training sets and increased relatedness between training and validation sets.
基因组选择 (GS) 已经成为选择标记辅助选择效果较差的数量性状的可行方法。使用 483 个精英育种系,通过 BARCSoySNP6K iSelect BeadChips 进行基因型分析,对大豆的 GS 潜力进行了表征。使用 RR-BLUP 进行交叉验证,实现了蛋白质、油分和产量的预测能力分别为 0.81、0.71 和 0.26,在最大的测试训练集大小下达到了这一水平。在比较不同标记密度时,观察到最小的差异,并且由于群体结构,似乎存在 的膨胀。为了比较目的,还测试了另外两种在 GS 数据集内的四个双亲群体的系预测育种值的方法。第一种方法在每个双亲群体内预测(WP 方法),并利用验证集的全同胞训练集。第二种方法利用除验证集的全同胞之外的所有剩余育种系的训练集在群体之间进行预测(AP 方法)。AP 方法更实用,因为 WP 方法可能会延迟育种周期并利用较小的训练集。对于蛋白质和油分含量,AP 方法的平均 (0.55、0.30)接近 WP 方法的 (0.60、0.52)。尽管类似,但 AP 和 WP 方法的产量 都较低(0.12、0.13)。基于训练集增加时 的增加和 WP 方法的有效性,AP 方法可能会随着更大的训练集和训练与验证集之间的相关性增加而得到改善。