• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

残疾人粪便潜血试验筛查结直肠癌参与率的差异:韩国国家数据库研究。

Disparities in the Participation Rate of Colorectal Cancer Screening by Fecal Occult Blood Test among People with Disabilities: A National Database Study in South Korea.

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine/Supportive Care Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Digital Health, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jan;52(1):60-73. doi: 10.4143/crt.2018.660. Epub 2019 May 7.

DOI:10.4143/crt.2018.660
PMID:31096735
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6962481/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Implementation of screening program may lead to increased health disparity within the population if participation differs by socioeconomic status. In Korea, colorectal cancer screening is provided at no or minimal cost to all people over 50 by National Cancer Screening Program. We investigated colorectal cancer screening participation rate and its trend over the last 10 years in relation to disabilities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We linked national disability registration data with National Cancer Screening Program data. Age, sex-standardized participation rates were analyzed by type and severity of disability for each year, and factors associated with colorectal cancer screening participation were examined by multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

Age, sex-standardized participation rate in people without disability increased from 16.2 to 33.9% (change, +17.7), but it increased from 12.7% to 27.2% (change, +14.5) among people with severe disability. People with severe disabilities showed a markedly lower colorectal cancer screening participation rate than people without disability (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.714; 95% confidence interval, 0.713 to 0.720). People with autism (aOR, 0.468), renal failure (aOR, 0.498), brain injury (aOR, 0.581), ostomy (aOR, 0.602), and intellectual disability (aOR, 0.610) showed the lowest participation rates.

CONCLUSION

Despite the availability of a National Cancer Screening Program and overall increase of its usage in the Korean population, a significant disparity was found in colorectal cancer screening participation, especially in people with severe disabilities and or several specific types of disabilities. Greater effort is needed to identify the barriers faced by these particularly vulnerable groups and develop targeted interventions to reduce inequality.

摘要

目的

如果参与率因社会经济地位而异,筛查计划的实施可能会导致人群中的健康差距扩大。在韩国,国家癌症筛查计划为所有 50 岁以上的人提供免费或低费用的大肠癌筛查。我们调查了过去 10 年来与残疾相关的大肠癌筛查参与率及其趋势。

材料和方法

我们将国家残疾登记数据与国家癌症筛查计划数据相联系。每年按残疾类型和严重程度分析年龄、性别标准化的参与率,并通过多变量逻辑回归分析与大肠癌筛查参与相关的因素。

结果

无残疾者的年龄、性别标准化参与率从 16.2%增加到 33.9%(变化幅度为+17.7%),而严重残疾者的参与率从 12.7%增加到 27.2%(变化幅度为+14.5%)。严重残疾者的大肠癌筛查参与率明显低于无残疾者(调整后的优势比[aOR],0.714;95%置信区间,0.713 至 0.720)。自闭症(aOR,0.468)、肾衰竭(aOR,0.498)、脑损伤(aOR,0.581)、造口术(aOR,0.602)和智力残疾(aOR,0.610)的参与者的参与率最低。

结论

尽管有国家癌症筛查计划,并且韩国人口对其总体使用率有所增加,但在大肠癌筛查参与方面仍存在显著差异,尤其是在严重残疾者和/或某些特定类型的残疾者中。需要做出更大的努力来确定这些特别脆弱群体所面临的障碍,并制定有针对性的干预措施来减少不平等。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34a7/6962481/1afd6e9ba771/crt-2018-660f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34a7/6962481/f09aa2e99ae1/crt-2018-660f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34a7/6962481/f7b4089210fb/crt-2018-660f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34a7/6962481/1afd6e9ba771/crt-2018-660f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34a7/6962481/f09aa2e99ae1/crt-2018-660f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34a7/6962481/f7b4089210fb/crt-2018-660f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34a7/6962481/1afd6e9ba771/crt-2018-660f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Disparities in the Participation Rate of Colorectal Cancer Screening by Fecal Occult Blood Test among People with Disabilities: A National Database Study in South Korea.残疾人粪便潜血试验筛查结直肠癌参与率的差异:韩国国家数据库研究。
Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jan;52(1):60-73. doi: 10.4143/crt.2018.660. Epub 2019 May 7.
2
Disparities in Cervical Cancer Screening Among Women With Disabilities: A National Database Study in South Korea.残疾女性宫颈癌筛查中的差异:韩国全国数据库研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Sep 20;36(27):2778-2786. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.77.7912. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
3
Disparities in gastric cancer screening among people with disabilities: a national registry-linkage study in South Korea.残疾人群胃癌筛查的差异:韩国全国登记系统关联研究。
Gastric Cancer. 2020 May;23(3):497-509. doi: 10.1007/s10120-019-01017-8. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
4
Breast cancer screening disparities between women with and without disabilities: A national database study in South Korea.乳腺癌筛查中残疾女性与非残疾女性之间的差异:韩国国家数据库研究。
Cancer. 2020 Apr 1;126(7):1522-1529. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32693. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
5
Disparities in Liver Cancer Surveillance Among People With Disabilities: A National Database Study in Korea.韩国残疾人肝癌监测差异:一项全国数据库研究
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2021;55(5):439-448. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001405.
6
Acceptance on colorectal cancer screening upper age limit in South Korea.韩国接受结直肠癌筛查的最高年龄限制。
World J Gastroenterol. 2020 Jul 21;26(27):3963-3974. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i27.3963.
7
Uptake of cancer screening among adults with disabilities in Flanders (Belgium).癌症筛查在佛兰德(比利时)残疾成年人中的普及率。
J Med Screen. 2020 Mar;27(1):48-51. doi: 10.1177/0969141319870221. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
8
Disparities between persons with and without disabilities in their participation rates in mass screening.残疾人和非残疾人在群体筛查参与率方面的差异。
Eur J Public Health. 2009 Jan;19(1):85-90. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckn108.
9
Fecal Occult Blood Test Results of the National Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in South Korea (2006-2013).韩国国家结直肠癌筛查计划(2006-2013 年)粪便潜血试验结果。
Sci Rep. 2017 Jun 5;7(1):2804. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03134-9.
10
Rural disparities in receipt of colorectal cancer screening among adults ages 50-64 with disabilities.50至64岁残疾成年人在接受结直肠癌筛查方面的农村差异。
Disabil Health J. 2014 Oct;7(4):394-401. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2014.06.001. Epub 2014 Jun 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers to cancer screening uptake and approaches to overcome them: a systematic literature review.癌症筛查普及的障碍及克服这些障碍的方法:一项系统的文献综述
Front Oncol. 2025 Aug 6;15:1575820. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1575820. eCollection 2025.
2
Enhancing doxorubicin's anticancer impact in colorectal cancer by targeting the Akt/Gsk3β/mTOR-SREBP1 signaling axis with an HDAC inhibitor.通过使用组蛋白去乙酰化酶(HDAC)抑制剂靶向Akt/Gsk3β/mTOR-SREBP1信号轴增强阿霉素对结直肠癌的抗癌作用。
Korean J Physiol Pharmacol. 2025 May 1;29(3):321-335. doi: 10.4196/kjpp.24.274.
3
Health inequities among persons with disabilities: a global scoping review.

本文引用的文献

1
Disparities in Cervical Cancer Screening Among Women With Disabilities: A National Database Study in South Korea.残疾女性宫颈癌筛查中的差异:韩国全国数据库研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Sep 20;36(27):2778-2786. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.77.7912. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
2
Colon Cancer Screening among Patients Receiving Dialysis in the United States: Are We Choosing Wisely?美国接受透析治疗患者的结肠癌筛查:我们的选择明智吗?
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 Aug;28(8):2521-2528. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2016091019. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
3
Colorectal Cancer Screening Adherence in Selected Disabilities Over 10 Years.
残疾人中的健康不平等:一项全球范围综述
Front Public Health. 2025 Feb 10;13:1538519. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1538519. eCollection 2025.
4
Trends in uptake of cancer screening among people with severe mental illness before and after the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan: A repeated cross-sectional study.日本新冠疫情前后重度精神疾病患者癌症筛查接受情况的趋势:一项重复横断面研究。
PCN Rep. 2025 Feb 2;4(1):e70062. doi: 10.1002/pcn5.70062. eCollection 2025 Mar.
5
Disability and Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.结直肠癌筛查中的残疾与参与情况:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Curr Oncol. 2024 Nov 10;31(11):7023-7039. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31110517.
6
Disparities in the diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer among patients with disabilities.残疾患者在结直肠癌诊断和治疗方面的差异。
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2024 Jul 15;16(7):2925-2940. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i7.2925.
7
Comparative analysis of genetic testing utilization rates among people with and without disabilities in South Korea from 2016 to 2019, focusing on malignant neoplasms: A national population-based study.2016 年至 2019 年韩国有无残疾人群中基因检测利用率的比较分析,重点关注恶性肿瘤:一项全国性基于人群的研究。
Cancer Med. 2024 May;13(9):e7102. doi: 10.1002/cam4.7102.
8
Assessing cancer in people with profound and multiple disabilities.评估有严重和多重残疾的人的癌症。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Aug 25;23(1):798. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11313-3.
9
The Korea National Disability Registration System.韩国国家残疾登记系统。
Epidemiol Health. 2023;45:e2023053. doi: 10.4178/epih.e2023053. Epub 2023 May 11.
10
Uptake patterns and predictors of colorectal cancer screening among adults resident in Spain: A population-based study from 2017 to 2020.西班牙成年人的结直肠癌筛查模式及影响因素:基于人群的 2017-2020 年研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 13;11:1151225. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1151225. eCollection 2023.
结直肠癌筛查在 10 多年中对特定残障人群的坚持情况。
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Jun;52(6):735-741. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.01.005. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
4
Socioeconomic and ethnic inequities within organised colorectal cancer screening programmes worldwide.全球范围内,结直肠癌筛查规划中存在社会经济和种族不平等现象。
Gut. 2018 Apr;67(4):679-687. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313311. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
5
Trends in Participation Rates for the National Cancer Screening Program in Korea, 2002-2012.2002 - 2012年韩国国家癌症筛查计划的参与率趋势
Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Jul;49(3):798-806. doi: 10.4143/crt.2016.186. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
6
Why Do Some People Choose Opportunistic Rather Than Organized Cancer Screening? The Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) 2010-2012.为什么有些人选择机会性癌症筛查而非有组织的癌症筛查?2010 - 2012年韩国国民健康与营养检查调查(KNHANES)
Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Jul;49(3):727-738. doi: 10.4143/crt.2016.243. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
7
Data Resource Profile: The National Health Information Database of the National Health Insurance Service in South Korea.数据资源简介:韩国国民健康保险服务的国家健康信息数据库
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Jun 1;46(3):799-800. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw253.
8
Recommendations on Fecal Immunochemical Testing to Screen for Colorectal Neoplasia: A Consensus Statement by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.结直肠癌美国多学会专家组关于粪便免疫化学检测用于结直肠肿瘤筛查的共识声明。
Gastroenterology. 2017 Apr;152(5):1217-1237.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.08.053. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
9
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.结直肠癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组的更新证据报告和系统评价。
JAMA. 2016 Jun 21;315(23):2576-94. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.3332.
10
Trends in colorectal cancer screening over time for persons with and without chronic disability.随着时间推移,有和没有慢性残疾的人群在结直肠癌筛查方面的趋势。
Disabil Health J. 2016 Jul;9(3):498-509. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2016.02.003. Epub 2016 Mar 24.