Sarkar Saumya, Butcher Jonathan B, Johnson Thomas E, Clark Christopher M
Tetra Tech, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC.
Earth Interact. 2018;22(13):1-37. doi: 10.1175/EI-D-17-0015.1.
Climate change is likely to alter the quantity and quality of urban stormwater, presenting a risk to water quality and public health. How might stormwater management practices need to change to address future climate? Answering requires understanding how management practices respond to climate forcing. Traditional "gray" stormwater design employs engineered structures, sized based on assumptions about future rainfall, which have limited flexibility once built. Green infrastructure (GI) uses vegetation, soil, and distributed structures to manage rainwater where it falls and may provide greater flexibility for adaptation. There is, however, uncertainty about how a warmer climate may affect performance of different types of GI. This study uses the hydrologic and biogeochemical watershed model, Regional Hydro-Ecologic Simulation System (RHESSys), to investigate sensitivity of different GI practices to climate. Simulations examine 36 urban "archetypes" representing different development patterns (at the city block scale) of typical U.S. cities, eleven regional climatic settings, and a range of mid-21st century scenarios based on downscaled climate model output. Results suggest regionally variable effects of climate change on the performance of GI practices for water quantity, water quality, and carbon sequestration. GI is able to mitigate most projected future increases in surface runoff, while bioretention can mitigate increased nitrogen yield at nine of eleven sites. Simulated changes in carbon balance are small, while local evaporative cooling can be substantial. Given uncertainty in the local expression of future climate, infrastructure design should emphasize flexibility and robustness to a range of future conditions.
气候变化可能会改变城市雨水的数量和质量,对水质和公众健康构成风险。为应对未来气候,雨水管理措施可能需要如何改变?要回答这个问题,需要了解管理措施如何应对气候强迫。传统的“灰色”雨水设计采用工程结构,其规模是根据对未来降雨的假设确定的,一旦建成,灵活性有限。绿色基础设施(GI)利用植被、土壤和分布式结构在降雨地点管理雨水,可能为适应气候变化提供更大的灵活性。然而,气候变暖对不同类型的绿色基础设施性能的影响尚不确定。本研究使用水文和生物地球化学流域模型——区域水文生态模拟系统(RHESSys),来研究不同绿色基础设施措施对气候的敏感性。模拟考察了36个城市“原型”,它们代表了美国典型城市不同的发展模式(在城市街区尺度)、11种区域气候环境以及一系列基于降尺度气候模型输出的21世纪中叶情景。结果表明,气候变化对绿色基础设施措施在水量、水质和碳固存方面的性能影响存在区域差异。绿色基础设施能够缓解未来预计的大部分地表径流增加,而生物滞留措施能够在11个地点中的9个缓解氮产量的增加。模拟的碳平衡变化很小,而局部蒸发冷却可能很大。鉴于未来气候的局部表现存在不确定性,基础设施设计应强调对一系列未来条件的灵活性和稳健性。