• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

迈向更易获取的精准医学:构建更具可转移性的机器学习模型,以支持 2 型糖尿病的微血管和大血管并发症的预后决策。

Towards more Accessible Precision Medicine: Building a more Transferable Machine Learning Model to Support Prognostic Decisions for Micro- and Macrovascular Complications of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

机构信息

Institute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, 8-100 Phillips Wangensteen Building, 516 Delaware St. SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.

OptumLabs Visiting Fellow, Cambridge, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Med Syst. 2019 May 17;43(7):185. doi: 10.1007/s10916-019-1321-6.

DOI:10.1007/s10916-019-1321-6
PMID:31098679
Abstract

Although machine learning models are increasingly being developed for clinical decision support for patients with type 2 diabetes, the adoption of these models into clinical practice remains limited. Currently, machine learning (ML) models are being constructed on local healthcare systems and are validated internally with no expectation that they would validate externally and thus, are rarely transferrable to a different healthcare system. In this work, we aim to demonstrate that (1) even a complex ML model built on a national cohort can be transferred to two local healthcare systems, (2) while a model constructed on a local healthcare system's cohort is difficult to transfer; (3) we examine the impact of training cohort size on the transferability; and (4) we discuss criteria for external validity. We built a model using our previously published Multi-Task Learning-based methodology on a national cohort extracted from OptumLabs® Data Warehouse and transferred the model to two local healthcare systems (i.e., University of Minnesota Medical Center and Mayo Clinic) for external evaluation. The model remained valid when applied to the local patient populations and performed as well as locally constructed models (concordance: .73-.92), demonstrating transferability. The performance of the locally constructed models reduced substantially when applied to each other's healthcare system (concordance: .62-.90). We believe that our modeling approach, in which a model is learned from a national cohort and is externally validated, produces a transferable model, allowing patients at smaller healthcare systems to benefit from precision medicine.

摘要

尽管机器学习模型越来越多地被开发用于 2 型糖尿病患者的临床决策支持,但这些模型在临床实践中的应用仍然有限。目前,机器学习 (ML) 模型正在本地医疗保健系统上构建,并在内部进行验证,没有期望它们能够在外部进行验证,因此很少能够转移到不同的医疗保健系统。在这项工作中,我们旨在证明:(1) 即使是基于国家队列构建的复杂 ML 模型也可以转移到两个本地医疗保健系统;(2) 虽然基于本地医疗保健系统队列构建的模型很难转移;(3) 我们研究了训练队列大小对可转移性的影响;(4) 我们讨论了外部有效性的标准。我们使用之前在 OptumLabs®Data Warehouse 中提取的国家队列上发表的基于多任务学习的方法构建了一个模型,并将该模型转移到两个本地医疗保健系统(即明尼苏达大学医学中心和梅奥诊所)进行外部评估。当应用于本地患者群体时,该模型仍然有效,并且表现与本地构建的模型一样好(一致性:.73-.92),证明了可转移性。当应用于彼此的医疗保健系统时,本地构建的模型的性能大大降低(一致性:.62-.90)。我们相信,我们的建模方法,即从国家队列中学习模型并进行外部验证,可以产生可转移的模型,使较小医疗保健系统的患者能够受益于精准医疗。

相似文献

1
Towards more Accessible Precision Medicine: Building a more Transferable Machine Learning Model to Support Prognostic Decisions for Micro- and Macrovascular Complications of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.迈向更易获取的精准医学:构建更具可转移性的机器学习模型,以支持 2 型糖尿病的微血管和大血管并发症的预后决策。
J Med Syst. 2019 May 17;43(7):185. doi: 10.1007/s10916-019-1321-6.
2
Realization of a service for the long-term risk assessment of diabetes-related complications.实现一项针对糖尿病相关并发症长期风险评估的服务。
J Diabetes Complications. 2015 Jul;29(5):691-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2015.03.011. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
3
Stacked classifiers for individualized prediction of glycemic control following initiation of metformin therapy in type 2 diabetes.基于堆叠分类器的 2 型糖尿病患者起始二甲双胍治疗后血糖控制个体化预测
Comput Biol Med. 2018 Dec 1;103:109-115. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.10.017. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
4
Prediction of In-hospital Mortality in Emergency Department Patients With Sepsis: A Local Big Data-Driven, Machine Learning Approach.急诊科脓毒症患者院内死亡率的预测:一种基于本地大数据驱动的机器学习方法。
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Mar;23(3):269-78. doi: 10.1111/acem.12876. Epub 2016 Feb 13.
5
Application of machine learning methodology to assess the performance of DIABETIMSS program for patients with type 2 diabetes in family medicine clinics in Mexico.应用机器学习方法评估 DIABETIMSS 计划在墨西哥家庭医学诊所中 2 型糖尿病患者中的表现。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Nov 12;19(1):221. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0950-5.
6
Multi-Task Learning to Identify Outcome-Specific Risk Factors that Distinguish Individual Micro and Macrovascular Complications of Type 2 Diabetes.多任务学习以识别区分2型糖尿病个体微血管和大血管并发症的特定结局风险因素。
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2018 May 18;2017:122-131. eCollection 2018.
7
Using Machine Learning Applied to Real-World Healthcare Data for Predictive Analytics: An Applied Example in Bariatric Surgery.运用机器学习分析真实世界医疗数据进行预测分析:减重手术中的应用实例。
Value Health. 2019 May;22(5):580-586. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.01.011.
8
eDoctor: machine learning and the future of medicine.医生:机器学习与医学的未来。
J Intern Med. 2018 Dec;284(6):603-619. doi: 10.1111/joim.12822. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
9
Machine Learning Methods to Predict Diabetes Complications.预测糖尿病并发症的机器学习方法
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018 Mar;12(2):295-302. doi: 10.1177/1932296817706375. Epub 2017 May 12.
10
Evaluation of three machine learning models for self-referral decision support on low back pain in primary care.评价三种机器学习模型在初级保健中对下腰痛自我转诊决策支持的作用。
Int J Med Inform. 2018 Feb;110:31-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.11.010. Epub 2017 Nov 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting the risks of stroke, cardiovascular disease, and peripheral vascular disease among people with type 2 diabetes with artificial intelligence models: A systematic review and meta-analysis.使用人工智能模型预测2型糖尿病患者中风、心血管疾病和外周血管疾病的风险:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
Narra J. 2025 Apr;5(1):e2116. doi: 10.52225/narra.v5i1.2116. Epub 2025 Mar 19.
2
Prognostic models for short-term annual risk of severe complications and mortality in patients living with type 2 diabetes using a national medical claim database.使用国家医疗索赔数据库建立的2型糖尿病患者严重并发症和死亡率短期年度风险预测模型。
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2023 Jun 15;15(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s13098-023-01105-x.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Learning to Share Health Care Data: A Brief Timeline of Influential Common Data Models and Distributed Health Data Networks in U.S. Health Care Research.学习共享医疗保健数据:美国医疗保健研究中有影响力的通用数据模型和分布式健康数据网络简史。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2019 Mar 25;7(1):4. doi: 10.5334/egems.279.
2
Performance of a computable phenotype for identification of patients with diabetes within PCORnet: The Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network.计算表型在 PCORnet 中识别糖尿病患者的性能:以患者为中心的临床研究网络。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2019 May;28(5):632-639. doi: 10.1002/pds.4718. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
3
Artificial intelligence based prediction models for individuals at risk of multiple diabetic complications: A systematic review of the literature.
基于人工智能的预测模型在预测多种糖尿病并发症高危人群中的应用:文献系统综述。
J Nurs Manag. 2022 Nov;30(8):3765-3776. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13894. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
4
Bias or biology? Importance of model interpretation in machine learning studies from electronic health records.偏差还是生物学?电子健康记录机器学习研究中模型解释的重要性。
JAMIA Open. 2022 Aug 8;5(3):ooac063. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooac063. eCollection 2022 Oct.
5
Clinical Prediction Models for Heart Failure Hospitalization in Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.2 型糖尿病患者心力衰竭住院的临床预测模型:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 May 17;11(10):e024833. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.024833. Epub 2022 May 16.
6
Artificial Intelligence for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD); Accurately Predicting Adverse Outcomes Using Machine Learning.人工智能在炎症性肠病(IBD)中的应用;使用机器学习准确预测不良结局。
Dig Dis Sci. 2022 Oct;67(10):4874-4885. doi: 10.1007/s10620-022-07506-8. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
7
Evaluation of Machine Learning Methods Developed for Prediction of Diabetes Complications: A Systematic Review.评价用于预测糖尿病并发症的机器学习方法:系统综述。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023 Mar;17(2):474-489. doi: 10.1177/19322968211056917. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
8
Assessing the International Transferability of a Machine Learning Model for Detecting Medication Error in the General Internal Medicine Clinic: Multicenter Preliminary Validation Study.评估用于检测普通内科门诊用药错误的机器学习模型的国际可转移性:多中心初步验证研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Jan 27;9(1):e23454. doi: 10.2196/23454.
9
Artificial Intelligence and Big Data in Diabetes Care: A Position Statement of the Italian Association of Medical Diabetologists.糖尿病护理中的人工智能与大数据:意大利医学糖尿病专家协会立场声明
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 22;22(6):e16922. doi: 10.2196/16922.
Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Bariatric Procedures for Weight Loss: A PCORnet Cohort Study.
减重手术的疗效和安全性比较:PCORnet 队列研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Dec 4;169(11):741-750. doi: 10.7326/M17-2786. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
4
Multi-Task Learning to Identify Outcome-Specific Risk Factors that Distinguish Individual Micro and Macrovascular Complications of Type 2 Diabetes.多任务学习以识别区分2型糖尿病个体微血管和大血管并发症的特定结局风险因素。
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2018 May 18;2017:122-131. eCollection 2018.
5
Comparative effectiveness of bariatric procedures among adolescents: the PCORnet bariatric study.青少年减重手术效果的比较:PCORnet 减重研究。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018 Sep;14(9):1374-1386. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.04.002. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
6
Prospective validation of pathologic complete response models in rectal cancer: Transferability and reproducibility.前瞻性验证直肠癌病理完全缓解模型:可转移性和可重复性。
Med Phys. 2017 Sep;44(9):4961-4967. doi: 10.1002/mp.12423. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
7
Machine Learning and Data Mining Methods in Diabetes Research.糖尿病研究中的机器学习与数据挖掘方法
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2017 Jan 8;15:104-116. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2016.12.005. eCollection 2017.
8
Predicting the Future - Big Data, Machine Learning, and Clinical Medicine.预测未来——大数据、机器学习与临床医学。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Sep 29;375(13):1216-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1606181.
9
The Cancer Research Network: a platform for epidemiologic and health services research on cancer prevention, care, and outcomes in large, stable populations.癌症研究网络:一个针对大型稳定人群的癌症预防、护理及预后开展流行病学和卫生服务研究的平台。
Cancer Causes Control. 2016 Nov;27(11):1315-1323. doi: 10.1007/s10552-016-0808-4. Epub 2016 Sep 17.
10
Differing predictive relationships between baseline LDL-C, systolic blood pressure, and cardiovascular outcomes.基线低密度脂蛋白胆固醇、收缩压与心血管结局之间不同的预测关系。
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Nov 1;222:548-556. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.07.201. Epub 2016 Jul 30.