• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Machine Learning Methods Developed for Prediction of Diabetes Complications: A Systematic Review.评价用于预测糖尿病并发症的机器学习方法:系统综述。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023 Mar;17(2):474-489. doi: 10.1177/19322968211056917. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
2
Comparison of Multivariable Logistic Regression and Other Machine Learning Algorithms for Prognostic Prediction Studies in Pregnancy Care: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.多变量逻辑回归与其他机器学习算法在孕期护理预后预测研究中的比较:系统评价与荟萃分析
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Nov 17;8(11):e16503. doi: 10.2196/16503.
3
Risk prediction models for diabetic nephropathy among type 2 diabetes patients in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis.中国 2 型糖尿病患者糖尿病肾病风险预测模型的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Jul 3;15:1407348. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1407348. eCollection 2024.
4
Machine learning models for diabetes management in acute care using electronic medical records: A systematic review.使用电子病历的急性护理中糖尿病管理的机器学习模型:一项系统综述。
Int J Med Inform. 2022 Apr 2;162:104758. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104758.
5
Diagnostic Performance of Machine Learning-based Models in Neonatal Sepsis: A Systematic Review.基于机器学习的模型在新生儿败血症中的诊断性能:系统评价。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2024 Sep 1;43(9):889-901. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000004409. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Machine learning vs. conventional statistical models for predicting heart failure readmission and mortality.用于预测心力衰竭再入院和死亡率的机器学习与传统统计模型对比
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Feb;8(1):106-115. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13073. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
8
Prognostic models for newly-diagnosed chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.成人新诊断慢性淋巴细胞白血病的预后模型:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 31;7(7):CD012022. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012022.pub2.
9
Prognostic models for predicting clinical disease progression, worsening and activity in people with multiple sclerosis.用于预测多发性硬化症患者临床疾病进展、恶化和活动的预后模型。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Sep 8;9(9):CD013606. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013606.pub2.
10
Does machine learning have a high performance to predict obesity among adults and older adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis.机器学习在预测成年人和老年人肥胖方面的性能如何?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2024 Sep;34(9):2034-2045. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2024.05.020. Epub 2024 May 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Machine Learning to Diagnose Complications of Diabetes.用于诊断糖尿病并发症的机器学习
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025 Sep 11:19322968251365245. doi: 10.1177/19322968251365245.
2
Transparency and Validity of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Pediatric Diabetes: A Systematic Review.人工智能在儿科糖尿病应用中的透明度与有效性:一项系统综述
Cureus. 2025 Jul 30;17(7):e89093. doi: 10.7759/cureus.89093. eCollection 2025 Jul.
3
Investigation of multimorbidity patterns and association rules in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus using association rules mining algorithm.使用关联规则挖掘算法对2型糖尿病患者的共病模式和关联规则进行研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 16;15(1):25741. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-09926-8.
4
Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Prediabetes: A Scoping Review.人工智能和机器学习在糖尿病前期的应用:一项范围综述
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025 Jul 8:19322968251351995. doi: 10.1177/19322968251351995.
5
Optimized prediction of diabetes complications using ensemble learning with Bayesian optimization: a cost-efficient laboratory-based approach.使用贝叶斯优化的集成学习优化糖尿病并发症预测:一种基于实验室的经济高效方法。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 20;16:1593068. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1593068. eCollection 2025.
6
Engineering novel features for diabetes complication prediction using synthetic electronic health records.利用合成电子健康记录设计用于糖尿病并发症预测的新特征。
Front Genet. 2025 Apr 14;16:1451290. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2025.1451290. eCollection 2025.
7
Machine learning applications to classify and monitor medication adherence in patients with type 2 diabetes in Ethiopia.机器学习在埃塞俄比亚2型糖尿病患者用药依从性分类和监测中的应用。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Mar 20;16:1486350. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1486350. eCollection 2025.
8
Development and internal validation of an interpretable risk prediction model for diabetic peripheral neuropathy in type 2 diabetes: a single-centre retrospective cohort study in China.2型糖尿病患者糖尿病周围神经病变可解释性风险预测模型的开发与内部验证:一项中国单中心回顾性队列研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 3;15(4):e092463. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092463.
9
Pharmacist-led surgical medicines prescription optimization and prediction service improves patient outcomes - a machine learning based study.由药剂师主导的外科用药处方优化与预测服务可改善患者预后——一项基于机器学习的研究。
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Mar 14;16:1534552. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1534552. eCollection 2025.
10
The correlation between TyG-BMI and the risk of osteoporosis in middle-aged and elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.2型糖尿病中老年患者TyG-BMI与骨质疏松症风险的相关性
Front Nutr. 2025 Mar 11;12:1525105. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1525105. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Population segmentation of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients and its clinical applications - a scoping review.2 型糖尿病患者的人群细分及其临床应用——范围综述。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Mar 11;21(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01209-w.
2
Accurate Prediction of Coronary Heart Disease for Patients With Hypertension From Electronic Health Records With Big Data and Machine-Learning Methods: Model Development and Performance Evaluation.利用大数据和机器学习方法从电子健康记录中准确预测高血压患者的冠心病:模型开发与性能评估
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Jul 6;8(7):e17257. doi: 10.2196/17257.
3
Prediction models for development of retinopathy in people with type 2 diabetes: systematic review and external validation in a Dutch primary care setting.预测 2 型糖尿病患者视网膜病变发展的模型:荷兰初级保健环境中的系统评价和外部验证。
Diabetologia. 2020 Jun;63(6):1110-1119. doi: 10.1007/s00125-020-05134-3. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
4
Differential Health Care Use, Diabetes-Related Complications, and Mortality Among Five Unique Classes of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in Singapore: A Latent Class Analysis of 71,125 Patients.新加坡 2 型糖尿病 5 种独特患者群体的医疗差异使用、糖尿病相关并发症和死亡率:71125 例患者的潜在类别分析。
Diabetes Care. 2020 May;43(5):1048-1056. doi: 10.2337/dc19-2519. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
5
Early detection of diabetic kidney disease by urinary proteomics and subsequent intervention with spironolactone to delay progression (PRIORITY): a prospective observational study and embedded randomised placebo-controlled trial.尿蛋白质组学早期检测糖尿病肾病及其随后用螺内酯干预延缓进展(优先):一项前瞻性观察研究和嵌入式随机安慰剂对照试验。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020 Apr;8(4):301-312. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30026-7. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
6
Nationwide prediction of type 2 diabetes comorbidities.全国范围内 2 型糖尿病合并症预测。
Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 4;10(1):1776. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58601-7.
7
Longitudinal Risk Prediction of Chronic Kidney Disease in Diabetic Patients Using a Temporal-Enhanced Gradient Boosting Machine: Retrospective Cohort Study.使用时间增强梯度提升机对糖尿病患者慢性肾脏病进行纵向风险预测:回顾性队列研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Jan 31;8(1):e15510. doi: 10.2196/15510.
8
Myocardial infarction in type 2 diabetes using sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: proportional hazards analysis by deep neural network based machine learning.基于深度学习神经网络的机器学习对 2 型糖尿病使用钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂、二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂或胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂的心肌梗死的比例风险分析。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2020 Mar;36(3):403-409. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2019.1706043. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
9
Artificial Intelligence Applications in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Care: Focus on Machine Learning Methods.人工智能在2型糖尿病护理中的应用:聚焦机器学习方法。
Healthc Inform Res. 2019 Oct;25(4):248-261. doi: 10.4258/hir.2019.25.4.248. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
10
Bimodal learning via trilogy of skip-connection deep networks for diabetic retinopathy risk progression identification.通过 skip-connection 深度网络三部曲进行双模态学习,以识别糖尿病视网膜病变风险进展。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Dec;132:103926. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.07.005. Epub 2019 Aug 5.

评价用于预测糖尿病并发症的机器学习方法:系统综述。

Evaluation of Machine Learning Methods Developed for Prediction of Diabetes Complications: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.

MOH Holdings Private Ltd., Singapore.

出版信息

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023 Mar;17(2):474-489. doi: 10.1177/19322968211056917. Epub 2021 Nov 3.

DOI:10.1177/19322968211056917
PMID:34727783
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10012374/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

With the rising prevalence of diabetes, machine learning (ML) models have been increasingly used for prediction of diabetes and its complications, due to their ability to handle large complex data sets. This study aims to evaluate the quality and performance of ML models developed to predict microvascular and macrovascular diabetes complications in an adult Type 2 diabetes population.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted in MEDLINE®, Embase®, the Cochrane® Library, Web of Science®, and DBLP Computer Science Bibliography databases according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) checklist. Studies that developed or validated ML prediction models for microvascular or macrovascular complications in people with Type 2 diabetes were included. Prediction performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). An AUC >0.75 indicates clearly useful discrimination performance, while a positive mean relative AUC difference indicates better comparative model performance.

RESULTS

Of 13 606 articles screened, 32 studies comprising 87 ML models were included. Neural networks (n = 15) were the most frequently utilized. Age, duration of diabetes, and body mass index were common predictors in ML models. Across predicted outcomes, 36% of the models demonstrated clearly useful discrimination. Most ML models reported positive mean relative AUC compared with non-ML methods, with random forest showing the best overall performance for microvascular and macrovascular outcomes. Majority (n = 31) of studies had high risk of bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Random forest was found to have the overall best prediction performance. Current ML prediction models remain largely exploratory, and external validation studies are required before their clinical implementation.

PROTOCOL REGISTRATION

Open Science Framework (registration number: 10.17605/OSF.IO/UP49X).

摘要

背景

随着糖尿病患病率的上升,机器学习 (ML) 模型因其能够处理大型复杂数据集而越来越多地用于预测糖尿病及其并发症。本研究旨在评估用于预测成年 2 型糖尿病人群微血管和大血管糖尿病并发症的 ML 模型的质量和性能。

方法

根据 PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)检查表,在 MEDLINE®、Embase®、Cochrane® Library、Web of Science® 和 DBLP 计算机科学参考书目数据库中进行了系统评价。纳入了开发或验证用于预测 2 型糖尿病患者微血管或大血管并发症的 ML 预测模型的研究。使用接收者操作特征曲线下的面积 (AUC) 评估预测性能。AUC>0.75 表示明显有用的区分性能,而阳性平均相对 AUC 差异表示更好的比较模型性能。

结果

在筛选出的 13606 篇文章中,有 32 项研究包括 87 个 ML 模型被纳入。神经网络(n=15)是最常用的。年龄、糖尿病病程和体重指数是 ML 模型中常见的预测因素。在预测结果中,有 36%的模型表现出明显有用的区分能力。与非 ML 方法相比,大多数 ML 模型报告了阳性平均相对 AUC,其中随机森林在微血管和大血管结局方面表现出最佳的整体性能。大多数研究(n=31)存在高偏倚风险。

结论

随机森林被发现具有整体最佳的预测性能。当前的 ML 预测模型仍在很大程度上处于探索阶段,在临床实施之前需要进行外部验证研究。

协议注册

开放科学框架(注册号:10.17605/OSF.IO/UP49X)。