• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Recommendations for the Evaluation of Cross-System Care Coordination from the VA State-of-the-art Working Group on VA/Non-VA Care.VA 州际先进工作组关于 VA/非 VA 护理的跨系统护理协调评估建议。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 May;34(Suppl 1):18-23. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-04972-1.
2
Coordinating Care Across VA Providers and Settings: Policy and Research Recommendations from VA's State of the Art Conference.协调 VA 提供者和设置之间的护理:VA 最先进会议的政策和研究建议。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 May;34(Suppl 1):11-17. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-04970-3.
3
A Qualitative Study of Primary Care Providers' Experiences with the Veterans Choice Program.一项关于初级保健提供者对退伍军人选择计划体验的定性研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Apr;34(4):598-603. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4810-2. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
4
VA Provider Perspectives on Coordinating COPD Care Across Health Systems.VA 医疗服务提供者对在整个医疗体系中协调 COPD 护理的看法。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 May;34(Suppl 1):37-42. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-04971-2.
5
Development of a Perceived Access Inventory for Community Care Mental Healthcare Services for Veterans.退伍军人社区护理精神卫生保健服务感知可及性量表的开发。
Mil Med. 2019 Jul 1;184(7-8):e301-e308. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usy429.
6
The advanced care coordination program: a protocol for improving transitions of care for dual-use veterans from community emergency departments back to the Veterans Health Administration (VA) primary care.高级医疗协调计划:改善两用退伍军人从社区急诊部门返回退伍军人健康管理局(VA)初级保健的过渡的方案。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Oct 22;19(1):734. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4582-3.
7
Factors Impacting Perceived Access to Early Prenatal Care among Pregnant Veterans Enrolled in the Department of Veterans Affairs.影响在退伍军人事务部注册的孕妇获得早期产前护理的感知因素。
Womens Health Issues. 2019 Jan-Feb;29(1):56-63. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2018.10.001. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
8
Interorganizational Care Coordination of Rural Veterans by Veterans Affairs and Community Care Programs: A Systematic Review.美国退伍军人事务部和社区护理项目对农村退伍军人的组织间护理协调:一项系统评价
Med Care. 2021 Jun 1;59(Suppl 3):S259-S269. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001542.
9
"Walking in a maze": community providers' difficulties coordinating health care for homeless patients.“在迷宫中行走”:社区服务提供者在协调为无家可归患者提供医疗保健方面的困难
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Sep 7;16(1):480. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1722-x.
10
Accessing Care Through the Veterans Choice Program: The Veteran Experience.通过 Veterans Choice Program 获取医疗服务:退伍军人的体验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Oct;33(10):1714-1720. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4574-8. Epub 2018 Jul 23.

引用本文的文献

1
An approach to evaluating the impact of virtual specialty care: the Veterans Health Administration's clinical resource hub as case study.一种评估虚拟专科护理影响的方法:以退伍军人健康管理局的临床资源中心为例进行研究。
JAMIA Open. 2025 May 20;8(3):ooaf038. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf038. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Use of implementation logic models in the Quadruple Aim QUERI: conceptualization and evolution.四重目标质量提升研究与促进中心中实施逻辑模型的应用:概念化与演变
Implement Sci Commun. 2025 Jan 16;6(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00678-6.
3
The translation-to-policy learning cycle to improve public health.用于改善公共卫生的翻译到政策的学习循环。
Learn Health Syst. 2024 Oct 11;8(4):e10463. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10463. eCollection 2024 Oct.
4
"We don't get that information right back to us unless it's a full-blown cancer": Challenges coordinating lung cancer screening across healthcare systems.“除非是全面发展的癌症,否则我们无法及时获得相关信息”:跨医疗系统协调肺癌筛查面临的挑战。
Health Serv Res. 2025 Feb;60(1):e14384. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14384. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
5
Characterizing Veteran suicide decedents that were not classified as high-suicide-risk.对未被归类为高自杀风险的退伍军人自杀死亡者进行特征描述。
Psychol Med. 2024 Aug;54(11):3135-3144. doi: 10.1017/S0033291724001296. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
6
Patient-reported pain and physical health for acupuncture and chiropractic care delivered by Veterans Affairs versus community providers.患者报告的疼痛和身体健康状况,比较退伍军人事务部和社区提供者提供的针灸和脊骨神经医学治疗。
PLoS One. 2024 May 15;19(5):e0303651. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303651. eCollection 2024.
7
Perspectives on supporting Veterans' social needs during hospital to home health transitions: findings from the Transitions Nurse Program.关于在医院到家的健康过渡期间支持退伍军人社会需求的观点:过渡护士项目的研究结果
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 25;24(1):520. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10900-9.
8
Characteristics of Veterans With Depression Who Use the Veterans Choice Program of the Veterans Health Administration.使用退伍军人健康管理局退伍军人选择计划的抑郁症退伍军人的特征。
Psychiatr Serv. 2024 Apr 1;75(4):349-356. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202100731. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
9
Gynecologist Supply Deserts Across the VA and in the Community.退伍军人事务部和社区的妇产科医生供应荒漠。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Sep;37(Suppl 3):690-697. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07591-5. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
10
A comparison of patient-reported mental health outcomes for the Department of Veterans Affairs' regional telehealth and Community Care Programs.美国退伍军人事务部地区远程医疗和社区关怀项目的患者心理健康报告结果比较。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Aug;57(4):755-763. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13993. Epub 2022 May 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Examining Women Veteran's Experiences, Perceptions, and Challenges With the Veterans Choice Program.考察女性退伍军人在 Veterans Choice Program 方面的经历、看法和面临的挑战。
Med Care. 2018 Jul;56(7):557-560. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000933.
2
Characteristics Associated With Utilization of VA and Non-VA Care Among Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans With Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder.伊拉克和阿富汗创伤后应激障碍退伍军人使用退伍军人事务部(VA)及非VA医疗服务的相关特征
Mil Med. 2017 Nov;182(11):e1892-e1903. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-17-00074.
3
Perceptions of U.S. Veterans Affairs and community healthcare providers regarding cross-system care for heart failure.美国退伍军人事务部和社区医疗服务提供者对心力衰竭跨系统护理的看法。
Chronic Illn. 2018 Dec;14(4):283-296. doi: 10.1177/1742395317729887. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
4
The role of health information technology in advancing care management and coordination in accountable care organizations.健康信息技术在推进责任医疗组织中的照护管理和协调中的作用。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2017 Oct/Dec;42(4):282-291. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000123.
5
Survey Instruments to Assess Patient Experiences With Access and Coordination Across Health Care Settings: Available and Needed Measures.评估患者在不同医疗环境下获得医疗服务及协调情况的体验的调查工具:现有及所需的测量方法。
Med Care. 2017 Jul;55 Suppl 7 Suppl 1(Suppl 7 1):S84-S91. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000730.
6
Coordinating Care Across Health Care Systems for Veterans With Gynecologic Malignancies: A Qualitative Analysis.为患有妇科恶性肿瘤的退伍军人协调跨医疗系统的护理:一项定性分析。
Med Care. 2017 Jul;55 Suppl 7 Suppl 1:S53-S60. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000737.
7
Evaluating the Veterans Choice Program: Lessons for Developing a High-performing Integrated Network.评估退伍军人选择计划:建立高效综合网络的经验教训。
Med Care. 2017 Jul;55 Suppl 7 Suppl 1:1-3. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000743.
8
Adaptation of Lean Six Sigma Methodologies for the Evaluation of Veterans Choice Program at 3 Urban Veterans Affairs Medical Centers.采用精益六西格玛方法评估3家城市退伍军人事务医疗中心的退伍军人选择计划
Med Care. 2017 Jul;55 Suppl 7 Suppl 1:S76-S83. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000721.
9
Medication Use among Veterans across Health Care Systems.跨医疗系统的退伍军人用药情况
Appl Clin Inform. 2017 Mar 8;8(1):235-249. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2016-10-RA-0184.
10
Pharmacy Use in the First Year of the Veterans Choice Program: A Mixed-methods Evaluation.退伍军人选择计划第一年的药房使用情况:一项混合方法评估
Med Care. 2017 Jul;55 Suppl 7 Suppl 1:S26-S32. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000661.

VA 州际先进工作组关于 VA/非 VA 护理的跨系统护理协调评估建议。

Recommendations for the Evaluation of Cross-System Care Coordination from the VA State-of-the-art Working Group on VA/Non-VA Care.

机构信息

VA Central Western Massachusetts Healthcare System, Leeds, MA, USA.

Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2019 May;34(Suppl 1):18-23. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-04972-1.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-019-04972-1
PMID:31098968
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6542862/
Abstract

In response to widespread concerns regarding Veterans' access to VA care, Congress enacted the Veterans Access, Choice and Accountability Act of 2014, which required VA to establish the Veterans Choice Program (VCP). Since the inception of VCP, more than two million Veterans have received care from community providers, representing approximately 25% of Veterans enrolled in VA care. However, expanded access to non-VA care has created challenges in care coordination between VA and community health systems. In March 2018, the VA Health Services Research & Development Service hosted a VA State of the Art conference (SOTA) focused on care coordination. The SOTA convened VA researchers, program directors, clinicians, and policy makers to identify knowledge gaps regarding care coordination within the VA and between VA and community systems of care. This article provides a summary and synthesis of relevant literature and provides recommendations generated from the SOTA about how to evaluate cross-system care coordination. Care coordination is typically evaluated using health outcomes including hospital readmissions and death; however, in cross-system evaluations of care coordination, measures such as access, cost, Veteran/patient and provider satisfaction (including with cross-system communication), comparable quality metrics, context (urban vs. rural), and patient complexity (medical and mental health conditions) need to be included to fully evaluate care coordination effectiveness. Future research should examine the role of multiple individuals coordinating VA and non-VA care, and how these coordinators work together to optimize coordination.

摘要

针对退伍军人获得退伍军人事务部 (VA) 护理服务的广泛关注,国会颁布了 2014 年《退伍军人准入、选择和问责法案》,要求 VA 建立退伍军人选择计划 (VCP)。自 VCP 成立以来,已有超过 200 万退伍军人从社区提供者那里获得了护理,约占 VA 护理登记退伍军人的 25%。然而,扩大获得非 VA 护理的机会给 VA 和社区卫生系统之间的护理协调带来了挑战。2018 年 3 月,VA 卫生服务研究与发展局 (VA Health Services Research & Development Service) 举办了一场专注于护理协调的 VA 最新技术会议 (SOTA)。SOTA 召集了 VA 研究人员、项目主任、临床医生和政策制定者,以确定 VA 内部以及 VA 和社区护理系统之间的护理协调方面的知识差距。本文总结并综合了相关文献,并提供了 SOTA 提出的关于如何评估跨系统护理协调的建议。护理协调通常使用包括住院再入院和死亡在内的健康结果来评估;然而,在跨系统的护理协调评估中,需要包括诸如可及性、成本、退伍军人/患者和提供者满意度(包括跨系统沟通)、可比质量指标、背景(城市与农村)和患者复杂性(医疗和心理健康状况)等措施,以全面评估护理协调的效果。未来的研究应该研究多个协调 VA 和非 VA 护理的个体的作用,以及这些协调者如何共同努力优化协调。