Levis Maxwell, Dimambro Monica, Levy Joshua, Dufort Vincent, Fraade Abby, Winer Max, Shiner Brian
White River Junction VA Medical Center, White River Junction, VT, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA.
Psychol Med. 2024 Aug;54(11):3135-3144. doi: 10.1017/S0033291724001296. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
Although the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has made important suicide prevention advances, efforts primarily target high-risk patients with documented suicide risk, such as suicidal ideation, prior suicide attempts, and recent psychiatric hospitalization. Approximately 90% of VA patients that go on to die by suicide do not meet these high-risk criteria and therefore do not receive targeted suicide prevention services. In this study, we used national VA data to focus on patients that were not classified as high-risk, but died by suicide.
Our sample included all VA patients who died by suicide in 2017 or 2018. We determined whether patients were classified as high-risk using the VA's machine learning risk prediction algorithm. After excluding these patients, we used principal component analysis to identify moderate-risk and low-risk patients and investigated demographics, service-usage, diagnoses, and social determinants of health differences across high-, moderate-, and low-risk subgroups.
High-risk ( = 452) patients tended to be younger, White, unmarried, homeless, and have more mental health diagnoses compared to moderate- ( = 2149) and low-risk ( = 2209) patients. Moderate- and low-risk patients tended to be older, married, Black, and Native American or Pacific Islander, and have more physical health diagnoses compared to high-risk patients. Low-risk patients had more missing data than higher-risk patients.
Study expands epidemiological understanding about non-high-risk suicide decedents, historically understudied and underserved populations. Findings raise concerns about reliance on machine learning risk prediction models that may be biased by relative underrepresentation of racial/ethnic minorities within health system.
尽管美国退伍军人事务部(VA)在自杀预防方面取得了重要进展,但其努力主要针对有记录的自杀风险的高危患者,如自杀意念、既往自杀未遂和近期精神科住院治疗。约90%最终自杀身亡的VA患者不符合这些高危标准,因此未接受针对性的自杀预防服务。在本研究中,我们使用VA的全国数据,重点关注未被归类为高危但自杀身亡的患者。
我们的样本包括2017年或2018年自杀身亡的所有VA患者。我们使用VA的机器学习风险预测算法确定患者是否被归类为高危。排除这些患者后,我们使用主成分分析来识别中度风险和低风险患者,并调查高、中、低风险亚组之间的人口统计学、服务使用情况、诊断以及健康差异的社会决定因素。
与中度风险(n = 2149)和低风险(n = 2209)患者相比,高危(n = 452)患者往往更年轻、为白人、未婚、无家可归,且有更多心理健康诊断。与高危患者相比,中度和低风险患者往往年龄更大、已婚、为黑人、美洲原住民或太平洋岛民,且有更多身体健康诊断。低风险患者比高风险患者有更多缺失数据。
本研究扩展了对非高危自杀死亡者这一历史上研究不足且服务欠缺人群的流行病学认识。研究结果引发了对依赖机器学习风险预测模型的担忧,这些模型可能因卫生系统中种族/族裔少数群体代表性相对不足而存在偏差。