• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多学科团队癌症护理的价值与未来发展

The Value and Future Developments of Multidisciplinary Team Cancer Care.

作者信息

Selby Peter, Popescu Razvan, Lawler Mark, Butcher Hugh, Costa Alberto

机构信息

1 Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.

2 Hirslanden Klinik Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland.

出版信息

Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2019 Jan;39:332-340. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_236857. Epub 2019 May 17.

DOI:10.1200/EDBK_236857
PMID:31099640
Abstract

Multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) have been recommended as a key part of best cancer care for 25 years. Here, we set out the functions and approaches of MDTs and review their impact. Although the literature is patchy in quality, MDTs contribute to improving cancer care and outcomes. They must be well organized, efficient, and well led; work with sound and timely information; and communicate well within the team and with their patients. Patients need carefully prepared information to help them share in the decision-making process. MDTs will be improved by a series of ongoing innovative developments. Increasing information from molecular pathology will increase the precision of their decisions, although the technologies remain expensive and may not be accessible in all countries for some time. New point-of-care testing technologies will improve the quality and timeliness of testing. Good informatics is essential to deliver the information to patients and the MDT. MDTs should be research active, delivering clinical trials, and this should improve outcomes for all of their patients. Patient engagement and empowerment in MDTs should improve patient satisfaction and outcomes. Patient-reported outcome measures will improve MDTs' insights into their patients' problems and symptoms and can improve patient outcomes.

摘要

25年来,多学科团队(MDTs)一直被推荐为优质癌症护理的关键组成部分。在此,我们阐述多学科团队的功能和方法,并回顾其影响。尽管文献质量参差不齐,但多学科团队有助于改善癌症护理和治疗结果。它们必须组织良好、高效且领导得力;依据准确及时的信息开展工作;团队内部以及与患者之间要进行良好沟通。患者需要精心准备的信息来帮助他们参与决策过程。一系列持续的创新发展将提升多学科团队。来自分子病理学的信息不断增加,将提高其决策的精准度,尽管这些技术仍然昂贵,且在一段时间内并非所有国家都能获取。新的即时检验技术将提高检测的质量和及时性。良好的信息学对于向患者和多学科团队提供信息至关重要。多学科团队应积极开展研究,进行临床试验,这应能改善所有患者的治疗结果。患者在多学科团队中的参与和赋权应能提高患者满意度和治疗结果。患者报告的结局指标将增进多学科团队对患者问题和症状的了解,并可改善患者治疗结果。

相似文献

1
The Value and Future Developments of Multidisciplinary Team Cancer Care.多学科团队癌症护理的价值与未来发展
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2019 Jan;39:332-340. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_236857. Epub 2019 May 17.
2
Consideration of comorbidity in treatment decision making in multidisciplinary cancer team meetings: a systematic review.考虑合并症在多学科癌症团队会议中的治疗决策中的作用:系统评价。
Ann Oncol. 2015 Jul;26(7):1325-32. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv025. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
3
Factors that can make an impact on decision-making and decision implementation in cancer multidisciplinary teams: an interview study of the provider perspective.影响癌症多学科团队决策和决策实施的因素:提供者视角的访谈研究。
Int J Surg. 2013;11(5):389-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.02.026. Epub 2013 Mar 14.
4
Multidisciplinary teams and ICT: a qualitative study exploring the use of technology and its impact on multidisciplinary team meetings.多学科团队与信息通信技术:一项探索技术应用及其对多学科团队会议影响的定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun 13;18(1):444. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3242-3.
5
Policy statement on multidisciplinary cancer care.多学科癌症护理政策声明。
Eur J Cancer. 2014 Feb;50(3):475-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.11.012. Epub 2013 Dec 6.
6
The role of oncologists in multidisciplinary cancer teams in the UK: an untapped resource for team leadership?英国多学科癌症团队中肿瘤学家的作用:团队领导的未开发资源?
J Eval Clin Pract. 2011 Dec;17(6):1200-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01507.x. Epub 2010 Jul 27.
7
Quality of care management decisions by multidisciplinary cancer teams: a systematic review.多学科癌症团队的护理管理决策质量:系统评价。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Aug;18(8):2116-25. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1675-6. Epub 2011 Mar 26.
8
Embedding continuous quality improvement processes in multidisciplinary teams in cancer care: exploring the boundaries between quality and implementation science.在癌症护理的多学科团队中嵌入持续质量改进流程:探索质量与实施科学之间的界限。
Aust Health Rev. 2017 Jul;41(3):291-296. doi: 10.1071/AH16052.
9
Measuring the quality of MDT working: an observational approach.测量 MDT 工作质量:一种观察方法。
BMC Cancer. 2012 May 29;12:202. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-202.
10
Developing and testing TEAM (Team Evaluation and Assessment Measure), a self-assessment tool to improve cancer multidisciplinary teamwork.开发和测试 TEAM(团队评估和评估工具),这是一种自我评估工具,旨在改善癌症多学科团队合作。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Dec;19(13):4019-27. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2493-1. Epub 2012 Jul 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Cancer Multidisciplinary Teams in Africa: A Narrative Review of Their Role and Availability.非洲的癌症多学科团队:对其作用与可及性的叙述性综述
Cureus. 2025 May 21;17(5):e84553. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84553. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Improving Access to Radiotherapy: Exploring Structural Quality Indicators for Radiotherapy in Gauteng Province, South Africa.改善放疗可及性:探索南非豪登省放疗的结构质量指标
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Apr 8;22(4):585. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22040585.
3
Designing Effective Multidisciplinary Team Meetings in the Greek National Health System: Opinions, Obstacles, and Implementation.
希腊国家卫生系统中有效多学科团队会议的设计:意见、障碍与实施
Cureus. 2025 Mar 13;17(3):e80550. doi: 10.7759/cureus.80550. eCollection 2025 Mar.
4
Clinical Utility of Integrated Multidisciplinary Patient-Centered Information in Breast Cancer Care: A Mixed Methods Study.乳腺癌护理中综合多学科以患者为中心的信息的临床效用:一项混合方法研究。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 Apr 5;18:1875-1893. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S506292. eCollection 2025.
5
Multispecialty sessions model for comprehensive care and decision-making in cancer patients.癌症患者综合护理与决策的多专科会议模式
Ecancermedicalscience. 2025 Jan 22;19:1830. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2025.1830. eCollection 2025.
6
Impact of Adopting a Multidisciplinary Care Delivery Model on Treatment Effectiveness and Outcomes in Stage III Melanoma Patients at a Community-Based Academic Institution: A Retrospective Study.在一家社区学术机构中采用多学科护理模式对III期黑色素瘤患者治疗效果和结局的影响:一项回顾性研究
Cureus. 2025 Feb 26;17(2):e79703. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79703. eCollection 2025 Feb.
7
Priority setting for improved leukemia management and research in South Africa: a modified Delphi study.南非改善白血病管理与研究的优先事项设定:一项改良德尔菲研究
Cancer Causes Control. 2025 Mar 4. doi: 10.1007/s10552-025-01979-4.
8
Profiling the persistent and episodic nature of long COVID symptoms and the impact on quality of life and functional status: a cohort observation study.剖析新冠后长期症状的持续性和发作性本质及其对生活质量和功能状态的影响:一项队列观察研究
J Glob Health. 2025 Feb 7;15:04006. doi: 10.7189/jogh.15.04006.
9
Patient-centered interprofessional education in cancer care: a systematic scoping review.以患者为中心的癌症护理跨专业教育:一项系统的范围综述。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Dec 30;24(1):1552. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06600-x.
10
Otolaryngologist surgical preferences for orbital decompression in thyroid eye disease: A North American survey.耳鼻喉科医生对甲状腺眼病眼眶减压手术的偏好:一项北美调查。
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2024 Dec 9;9(6):e70051. doi: 10.1002/lio2.70051. eCollection 2024 Dec.