Suppr超能文献

使用加速度计评估乳腺癌幸存者和年龄匹配对照者的体力活动强度切点。

Estimation of physical activity intensity cut-points using accelerometry in breast cancer survivors and age-matched controls.

机构信息

Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.

Department of Physical Therapy, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019 Sep;28(5):e13090. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13090. Epub 2019 May 20.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between accelerometer activity counts and energy expenditure during walking in breast cancer survivors (BCS) compared with age-matched healthy controls, and differences in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) cut-points.

METHODS

Using a case-control design, 19 BCS and 19 age-matched women completed 6 min of resting energy expenditure and 6-min periods of treadmill walking in Midwestern United States. Accelerometers and an open-circuit spirometry system were used to measure activity counts and energy expenditure (VO ). A mixed-factor analysis of variance was conducted on activity counts and VO . Independent samples t tests compared the magnitude of associations between groups.

RESULTS

There were group by speed interactions on energy expenditure (p < 0.001) and counts (p < 0.001). The linear association did not differ between BCS and controls for the R (p = 0.62) nor the slope (p = 0.43), but there was a difference in the intercept (p = 0.01). This resulted in different MVPA cut-points between groups: 1,439 ± 761 counts·min in BCS and 1,937 ± 639 counts·min in controls.

CONCLUSION

The findings support the use of different cut-points to quantify time spent in MVPA for BCS. Application of these cut-points is warranted to accurately assess physical activity (PA) patterns for better prescription and health outcomes in PA programmes for BCS.

摘要

目的

与年龄匹配的健康对照相比,研究乳腺癌幸存者(BCS)在行走过程中计步器活动计数与能量消耗之间的关系,以及中高强度体力活动(MVPA)切点的差异。

方法

采用病例对照设计,19 名 BCS 和 19 名年龄匹配的女性在美国中西部完成了 6 分钟的静息能量消耗和 6 分钟的跑步机行走。使用计步器和开环测功仪系统来测量活动计数和能量消耗(VO )。对活动计数和 VO 进行混合因子方差分析。独立样本 t 检验比较了组间关联的大小。

结果

能量消耗(p < 0.001)和计步器计数(p < 0.001)存在组间速度交互作用。BCS 和对照组之间的 R 值(p = 0.62)和斜率(p = 0.43)之间没有线性关联差异,但截距(p = 0.01)有差异。这导致了两组之间的 MVPA 切点不同:BCS 组为 1,439 ± 761 计数·分钟,对照组为 1,937 ± 639 计数·分钟。

结论

这些发现支持使用不同的切点来量化 BCS 中 MVPA 的时间。为了更准确地评估 BCS 体育活动计划中的体力活动(PA)模式,从而获得更好的健康结果,应用这些切点是合理的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验