Suppr超能文献

重新审视以能量消耗为标准的加速度计校准:用 VO 替代 MET 来表示与年龄相当的体力活动强度。

Reexamination of Accelerometer Calibration with Energy Expenditure as Criterion: VO Instead of MET for Age-Equivalent Physical Activity Intensity.

机构信息

Center for Health and Performance, Department of Food and Nutrition, and Sport Science, University of Gothenburg, 40530 Gothenburg, Sweden.

Department of Biometry and Data Management, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, 28359 Bremen, Germany.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2019 Aug 1;19(15):3377. doi: 10.3390/s19153377.

Abstract

Accelerometer calibration for physical activity (PA) intensity is commonly performed using Metabolic Equivalent of Task (MET) as criterion. However, MET is not an age-equivalent measure of PA intensity, which limits the use of MET-calibrated accelerometers for age-related PA investigations. We investigated calibration using VO (VO - VO; mL⋅min⋅kg) as criterion compared to MET (VO/VO) and the effect on assessment of free-living PA in children, adolescents and adults. Oxygen consumption and hip/thigh accelerometer data were collected during rest, stand and treadmill walk and run. Equivalent speed (Speed) was used as indicator of the absolute speed (Speed) performed with the same effort in individuals of different body size/age. The results showed that VO was higher in younger age-groups for Speed, but was similar in the three age-groups for Speed. MET was lower in younger age-groups for both Speed and Speed. The same VO-values respective MET-values were applied to all age-groups to develop accelerometer PA intensity cut-points. Free-living moderate-and-vigorous PA was 216, 115, 74 and 71 min/d in children, adolescents, younger and older adults with VO-calibration, but 140, 83, 74 and 41 min/d with MET-calibration, respectively. In conclusion, VO calibration of accelerometers may provide age-equivalent measures of PA intensity/effort for more accurate age-related investigations of PA in epidemiological research.

摘要

加速度计的体力活动(PA)强度校准通常使用代谢当量(MET)作为标准。然而,MET 不是 PA 强度的年龄等效衡量标准,这限制了 MET 校准的加速度计在与年龄相关的 PA 研究中的使用。我们研究了使用 VO(VO-VO;mL·min·kg)作为标准与 MET(VO/VO)相比的校准效果,以及对儿童、青少年和成年人的自由生活 PA 评估的影响。在休息、站立和跑步机行走和跑步期间收集耗氧量和臀部/大腿加速度计数据。等效速度(Speed)用作指示不同体型/年龄个体以相同努力完成的绝对速度(Speed)的指标。结果表明,在相同速度下,年轻年龄组的 VO 更高,但在三个年龄组中,Speed 的 VO 相似。对于 Speed 和 Speed,MET 在年轻年龄组中均较低。将相同的 VO 值分别应用于所有年龄组,以制定加速度计 PA 强度切点。采用 VO 校准的儿童、青少年、年轻和老年成年人的自由生活中等到剧烈 PA 分别为 216、115、74 和 71 min/d,但采用 MET 校准的分别为 140、83、74 和 41 min/d。总之,加速度计的 VO 校准可以提供 PA 强度/努力的年龄等效衡量标准,以便更准确地进行与年龄相关的流行病学研究中的 PA 研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/116e/6695745/f83f60494f07/sensors-19-03377-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验