Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.
JAMA Pediatr. 2019 Jul 1;173(7):671-680. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.1197.
Training parents to implement strategies to support child language development is crucial to support long-term outcomes, given that as many as 2 of 5 children younger than 5 years have difficulty learning language.
To examine the association between parent training and language and communication outcomes in young children.
Searches of ERIC, Academic Search Complete, PsycINFO, and PsycARTICLES were conducted on August 11, 2014; August 18, 2016; January 23, 2018; and October 30, 2018.
Studies included in this review and meta-analysis were randomized or nonrandomized clinical trials that evaluated a language intervention that included parent training with children with a mean age of less than 6 years. Studies were excluded if the parent was not the primary implementer of the intervention, the study included fewer than 10 participants, or the study did not report outcomes related to language or communication.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were applied to a total of 31 778 articles identified for screening, with the full text of 723 articles reviewed and 76 total studies ultimately included.
Main outcomes included language and communication skills in children with primary or secondary language impairment and children at risk for language impairment.
This meta-analysis included 59 randomized clinical trials and 17 nonrandomized clinical trials including 5848 total participants (36.4 female [20.8%]; mean [SD] age, 3.5 [3.9] years). The intervention approach in 63 studies was a naturalistic teaching approach, and 16 studies used a primarily dialogic reading approach. There was a significant moderate association between parent training and child communication, engagement, and language outcomes (mean [SE] Hedges g, -0.33 [0.06]; P < .001). The association between parent training and parent use of language support strategies was large (mean [SE] Hedges g, 0.55 [0.11], P < .001). Children with developmental language disorder had the largest social communication outcomes (mean [SE] Hedges g, 0.37 [0.17]); large and significant associations were observed for receptive (mean [SE] Hedges g, 0.92 [0.30]) and expressive language (mean [SE] Hedges g, 0.83 [0.20]). Children at risk for language impairments had moderate effect sizes across receptive language (mean [SE] Hedges g, 0.28 [0.15]) and engagement outcomes (mean [SE] Hedges g, 0.36 [0.17]).
The findings suggest that training parents to implement language and communication intervention techniques is associated with improved outcomes for children and increased parent use of support strategies. These findings may have direct implications on intervention and prevention.
鉴于多达五分之二的 5 岁以下儿童在学习语言方面存在困难,培训父母实施支持儿童语言发展的策略对于支持长期结果至关重要。
研究父母培训与幼儿语言和沟通结果之间的关系。
2014 年 8 月 11 日、2016 年 8 月 18 日、2018 年 1 月 23 日和 2018 年 10 月 30 日对 ERIC、学术搜索完整、PsycINFO 和 PsycARTICLES 进行了搜索。
本综述和荟萃分析中包括的研究是随机或非随机临床试验,评估了包括父母培训在内的语言干预措施,这些措施适用于平均年龄小于 6 岁的儿童。如果父母不是干预的主要实施者、研究参与者少于 10 人,或者研究没有报告与语言或沟通相关的结果,则排除该研究。
应用系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目 (PRISMA) 指南对总共 31778 篇文章进行了筛选,对 723 篇文章进行了全文审查,最终纳入了 76 项研究。
主要结果包括主要语言障碍或有语言障碍风险的儿童的语言和沟通技能。
这项荟萃分析包括 59 项随机临床试验和 17 项非随机临床试验,共有 5848 名参与者(36.4%为女性[20.8%];平均[SD]年龄为 3.5[3.9]岁)。63 项研究采用自然教学法,16 项研究采用主要对话阅读法。父母培训与儿童沟通、参与和语言结果之间存在显著的中度关联(平均[SE]Hedges g,-0.33[0.06];P < .001)。父母培训与父母使用语言支持策略之间存在较大关联(平均[SE]Hedges g,0.55[0.11],P < .001)。有发育性语言障碍的儿童的社会沟通结果最大(平均[SE]Hedges g,0.37[0.17]);观察到接受(平均[SE]Hedges g,0.92[0.30])和表达语言(平均[SE]Hedges g,0.83[0.20])的大而显著的关联。有语言障碍风险的儿童在接受性语言(平均[SE]Hedges g,0.28[0.15])和参与结果(平均[SE]Hedges g,0.36[0.17])方面的效应量适中。
研究结果表明,培训父母实施语言和沟通干预技术与儿童的改善结果以及父母更多地使用支持策略有关。这些发现可能对干预和预防具有直接意义。