Calabrese Edward J
Department of Public Health, Environmental Health Sciences, Morrill I, N344, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA,
Arch Toxicol. 2015 Apr;89(4):647-8. doi: 10.1007/s00204-015-1454-4. Epub 2015 Jan 18.
The Genetics Panel of the National Academy of Sciences' Committee on Biological Effects of Atomic Radiation (BEAR) recommended the adoption of the linear dose-response model in 1956, abandoning the threshold dose-response for genetic risk assessments. This recommendation was quickly generalized to include somatic cells for cancer risk assessment and later was instrumental in the adoption of linearity for carcinogen risk assessment by the Environmental Protection Agency. The Genetics Panel failed to provide any scientific assessment to support this recommendation and refused to do so when later challenged by other leading scientists. Thus, the linearity model used in cancer risk assessment was based on ideology rather than science and originated with the recommendation of the NAS BEAR Committee Genetics Panel. Historical documentation in support of these conclusions is provided in the transcripts of the Panel meetings and in previously unexamined correspondence among Panel members.
美国国家科学院原子辐射生物效应委员会(BEAR)的遗传学小组在1956年建议采用线性剂量反应模型,在遗传风险评估中摒弃阈值剂量反应模型。这一建议很快被推广到体细胞癌症风险评估中,后来对环境保护局采用致癌物风险评估线性模型起到了推动作用。遗传学小组未能提供任何科学评估来支持这一建议,在后来受到其他顶尖科学家质疑时也拒绝这样做。因此,癌症风险评估中使用的线性模型基于意识形态而非科学,起源于美国国家科学院BEAR委员会遗传学小组的建议。小组会议记录以及小组成员之间此前未被审查的通信中提供了支持这些结论的历史文献。