• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The effects of plan payment rates on the market for Medicare Advantage Dual-Eligible Special Needs Plans.计划支付率对医疗保险优势双重资格特殊需要计划市场的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2019 Oct;54(5):1137-1145. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13170. Epub 2019 May 20.
2
Higher Incentive Payments in Medicare Advantage's Pay-for-Performance Program Did Not Improve Quality But Did Increase Plan Offerings.医疗保险优势计划按绩效付费项目中更高的激励支付并未提高质量,但确实增加了计划产品。
Health Serv Res. 2015 Dec;50(6):1810-28. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12409. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
3
Effects of Early Dual-Eligible Special Needs Plans on Health Expenditure.早期双重资格特殊需要计划对卫生支出的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug;53(4):2165-2184. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12778. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
4
County-Level Enrollment in Medicare Advantage Plans Offering Expanded Supplemental Benefits.县级医疗保险优势计划的参保情况,这些计划提供了扩展的补充福利。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2433972. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.33972.
5
Impact of Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug Plan Star Ratings on Enrollment before and after Implementation of Quality-Related Bonus Payments in 2012.2012年与质量相关的奖金支付实施前后,医疗保险优势处方药计划星级评定对参保人数的影响。
PLoS One. 2016 May 5;11(5):e0154357. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154357. eCollection 2016.
6
Rural Medicare Advantage Plan Payment in 2015.2015年农村医疗保险优势计划支付情况
Rural Policy Brief. 2015 Dec 1(2015 12):1-5.
7
Growth of Medicare Advantage After Plan Payment Reductions.医疗保险优势计划在降低计划支付额后的增长。
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Jun 2;4(6):e231744. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.1744.
8
The Roles of Cost and Quality Information in Medicare Advantage Plan Enrollment Decisions: an Observational Study.成本和质量信息在医疗保险优势计划参保决策中的作用:一项观察性研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Feb;31(2):234-241. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3467-3. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
9
Medicare Advantage update: benefits, enrollment, and payments after the ACA.医疗保险优势更新:《平价医疗法案》后的福利、参保情况及支付情况
Issue Brief George Wash Univ Natl Health Policy Forum. 2013 Jul 19(850):1-12.
10
Analysis of Drivers of Disenrollment and Plan Switching Among Medicare Advantage Beneficiaries.医疗保险优势计划参保人退保和计划转换的驱动因素分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Apr 1;179(4):524-532. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.7639.

引用本文的文献

1
Publicly Reported Quality Performance for Dual-eligible Special Needs Plans, 2010-2019.2010 - 2019年双重资格特殊需求计划的公开报告质量绩效
J Aging Soc Policy. 2023 Jun 22:1-21. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2023.2226309.
2
Medicare Advantage Plan Double Bonuses Drive Racial Disparity In Payments, Yield No Quality Or Enrollment Improvements.医疗保险优势计划的双重奖金导致支付方面的种族差异,没有带来质量或参保人数的改善。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2021 Sep;40(9):1411-1419. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.00349.

本文引用的文献

1
Do Larger Health Insurance Subsidies Benefit Patients or Producers? Evidence from Medicare Advantage.更大的医疗保险补贴是有利于患者还是生产者?来自 Medicare Advantage 的证据。
Am Econ Rev. 2018 Aug;108(8):2048-87.
2
Effects of Early Dual-Eligible Special Needs Plans on Health Expenditure.早期双重资格特殊需要计划对卫生支出的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug;53(4):2165-2184. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12778. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
3
Passive Enrollment Of Dual-Eligible Beneficiaries Into Medicare And Medicaid Managed Care Has Not Met Expectations.双重资格受益人的被动加入医疗保险和医疗补助管理式医疗未达预期。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 May 1;36(5):846-854. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1082.
4
Higher Incentive Payments in Medicare Advantage's Pay-for-Performance Program Did Not Improve Quality But Did Increase Plan Offerings.医疗保险优势计划按绩效付费项目中更高的激励支付并未提高质量,但确实增加了计划产品。
Health Serv Res. 2015 Dec;50(6):1810-28. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12409. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
5
Competitive bidding in Medicare Advantage: effect of benchmark changes on plan bids.医疗保险优势计划中的竞争性投标:基准变化对计划投标的影响。
J Health Econ. 2013 Dec;32(6):1301-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.09.004.
6
The impact of the Affordable Care Act on Medicare Advantage plan availability and enrollment.平价医疗法案对医疗保险优势计划的供应和参保的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2012 Dec;47(6):2339-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2012.01426.x. Epub 2012 May 11.
7
Improving care for dual eligibles through innovations in financing.通过融资创新改善对双重资格者的护理。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Sep 15;365(11):e21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1108571. Epub 2011 Aug 31.
8
Special Needs Plans and the coordination of benefits and services for dual eligibles.特殊需求计划以及双重资格者的福利与服务协调。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Jan-Feb;28(1):136-46. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.1.136.
9
Medicare and Medicaid: conflicting incentives for long-term care.医疗保险和医疗补助:长期护理的激励措施相互冲突。
Milbank Q. 2007 Dec;85(4):579-610. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00502.x.

计划支付率对医疗保险优势双重资格特殊需要计划市场的影响。

The effects of plan payment rates on the market for Medicare Advantage Dual-Eligible Special Needs Plans.

机构信息

Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2019 Oct;54(5):1137-1145. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13170. Epub 2019 May 20.

DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.13170
PMID:31111471
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6736914/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of higher potential benchmark payment rates on the market for Medicare Advantage (MA) Dual-Eligible Special Needs Plans (D-SNPs).

DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Publicly available county-level data from 2009 to 2015 regarding the number of D-SNPs operating within the county, the enrollment in and five-star quality of score of these plans, and the benchmark amounts used to determine capitated plan payments.

STUDY DESIGN

This study exploits the introduction of quality bonus payments to the MA program in 2012, and exogenous geographic variation in the potential size of these bonuses to estimate the effect of benchmark payment increases on the availability, quality, and take-up of D-SNPs. We use a difference-in-difference estimation approach to compare changes in the market for D-SNPs in counties eligible for a double bonus to those that are not.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

The doubling of bonuses was associated with a relative 29 percent increase in the number of D-SNPs offered (P = 0.021) and 0.1-star increase in the average quality of available D-SNPs (P = 0.034). No relative increase in overall D-SNP enrollment was detected.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that larger benchmark payment amounts may influence insurers' decisions of whether to participate in the D-SNP market but not dual-eligibles' decision of whether to enroll in these plans. Future research is needed to inform discussions about whether D-SNPs are a viable mechanism for integrating benefits for dual eligibles and the degree to which Medicare policies should support their continued growth.

摘要

目的

确定更高的潜在基准支付率对医疗保险优势(MA)双重资格特殊需求计划(D-SNP)市场的影响。

数据来源/研究环境:2009 年至 2015 年,公共可用的县级数据,涉及在该县内运营的 D-SNP 数量、这些计划的参保人数和五星质量评分,以及用于确定人头付费计划支付的基准金额。

研究设计

本研究利用 2012 年 MA 计划引入质量奖金支付,以及这些奖金的潜在规模的外生地理差异,来估计基准支付增加对 D-SNP 的供应、质量和参保率的影响。我们使用差异差异估计方法来比较有资格获得双重奖金的县和没有资格获得双重奖金的县的 D-SNP 市场变化。

主要发现

奖金翻了一番,导致提供的 D-SNP 数量相对增加了 29%(P=0.021),可用 D-SNP 的平均质量提高了 0.1 星(P=0.034)。没有发现总体 D-SNP 参保人数的相对增加。

结论

这些发现表明,更大的基准支付金额可能会影响保险公司是否参与 D-SNP 市场的决策,但不会影响双重资格参保人是否选择参加这些计划的决策。未来的研究需要为关于 D-SNP 是否是整合双重资格受益人的可行机制以及医疗保险政策应在多大程度上支持其持续增长的讨论提供信息。