Suppr超能文献

主动式背部支撑外骨骼控制策略对提升过程中脊柱受力和运动学的影响。

The effect of control strategies for an active back-support exoskeleton on spine loading and kinematics during lifting.

机构信息

Department of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Netherlands.

Department of Advanced Robotics, Instituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy.

出版信息

J Biomech. 2019 Jun 25;91:14-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.04.044. Epub 2019 May 9.

Abstract

With mechanical loading as the main risk factor for LBP, exoskeletons (EXO) are designed to reduce the load on the back by taking over part of the moment normally generated by back muscles. The present study investigated the effect of an active exoskeleton, controlled using three different control modes (INCLINATION, EMG & HYBRID), on spinal compression forces during lifting with various techniques. Ten healthy male subjects lifted a 15 kg box, with three lifting techniques (free, squat & stoop), each of which was performed four times, once without EXO and once each with the three different control modes. Using inverse dynamics, we calculated L5/S1 joint moments. Subsequently, we estimated spine forces using an EMG-assisted trunk model. Peak compression forces substantially decreased by 17.8% when wearing the EXO compared to NO EXO. However, this reduction was partly, by about one third, attributable to a reduction of 25% in peak lifting speed when wearing the EXO. While subtle differences in back load patterns were seen between the three control modes, no differences in peak compression forces were found. In part, this may be related to limitations in the torque generating capacity of the EXO. Therefore, with the current limitations of the motors it was impossible to determine which of the control modes was best. Despite these limitations, the EXO still reduced both peak and cumulative compression forces by about 18%.

摘要

由于机械负荷是导致下腰痛(LBP)的主要风险因素,因此外骨骼(EXO)旨在通过接管背部肌肉通常产生的部分力矩来减轻背部的负荷。本研究调查了一种主动外骨骼(使用三种不同的控制模式(倾斜、肌电和混合)控制)对各种技术下举升过程中脊柱压缩力的影响。十名健康男性受试者举起一个 15 公斤的盒子,使用三种举升技术(自由、深蹲和弯腰),每种技术各进行四次,一次不戴 EXO,一次分别使用三种不同的控制模式。使用逆动力学,我们计算了 L5/S1 关节力矩。随后,我们使用肌电辅助躯干模型来估计脊柱力。与不戴 EXO 相比,佩戴 EXO 时 L5/S1 关节的压缩力峰值显著降低了 17.8%。然而,由于佩戴 EXO 时举升速度峰值降低了 25%,这种降低部分归因于此。虽然在三种控制模式之间观察到背部负荷模式的细微差异,但在压缩力峰值方面没有发现差异。这可能部分与 EXO 的扭矩产生能力的限制有关。因此,由于当前电机的限制,无法确定哪种控制模式最好。尽管存在这些限制,EXO 仍将峰值和累积压缩力降低了约 18%。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验