Department of Neurology and Developmental Medicine, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland.
Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Autism Res. 2019 Aug;12(8):1251-1259. doi: 10.1002/aur.2132. Epub 2019 May 24.
Epilepsy is known to occur in a higher-than-expected proportion of individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). Prior studies of this heterogeneous disorder have suggested that intelligence quotient (IQ) may drive this relationship. Because intellectual disability (ID) is, independently of ASD, a risk factor for epilepsy, current literature calls into question the long-understood unique relationship between ASD and epilepsy. Second, data have been unclear about whether developmental regression in ASD is associated with epilepsy. Using two cohorts from an online research registry, totaling 6,975 children with ASD, we examined the independent role of four ASD severity measures in driving the relationship with epilepsy: ID, language impairment, core ASD symptom severity, and motor dysfunction, controlling for two known relevant factors: age and sex. We also examined whether developmental regression and epilepsy have an independent statistical link. All four ASD severity factors showed independent statistical associations with epilepsy in one cohort, and three in the other. ID showed the largest relative risk (RR) in both cohorts. Effect sizes were modest. Regression similarly showed an independent statistical association with epilepsy, but with small effect size. Similar to previous work, ID showed the greatest contribution to RR for epilepsy among children with ASD. However, other ASD severity markers showed statistical associations, demonstrating that the ASD-epilepsy association is not reducible to the effect of ID. Inconsistencies in the literature may be due to underpowered studies, yet moving forward with larger-n studies, clinical significance and scientific relevance may be dictated by effect size and not merely statistical significance. Autism Res 2019, 12: 1251-1259. © 2019 International Society for Autism Research, Wiley Periodicals, Inc. LAY SUMMARY: Epilepsy is known to occur more often in individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) than is the case in the general population. The association between ASD and epilepsy is of interest because studying the two disorders in combination may help advance our understanding of genetic, molecular, and cellular mechanisms-as well as therapies-for both. Recent studies have suggested that intelligence quotient (IQ) alone in individuals with ASD may account for the increased prevalence of epilepsy. However, our approach was to look at a range of severity factors relevant to ASD and to look for correlations between each severity factor and epilepsy, within two large samples of children with ASD. In summary, we found that each severity factor-presence of intellectual disability, presence of language atypicalities, ASD-specific symptoms severity, and presence of motor issues-independently predicted a small increased risk for epilepsy, countering the argument that IQ alone is a risk factor. We also examined whether epilepsy is associated with developmental regression. Although severe epilepsy syndromes such as Landau-Kleffner syndrome are known to cause autistic-like symptoms following developmental regression, there is controversy about whether other forms of epilepsy are associated with the more common developmental regression seen in many young children with epilepsy. Indeed, we found a small association between epilepsy and developmental regression.
癫痫在自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)患者中的发病率高于预期。先前对这种异质疾病的研究表明,智商(IQ)可能是导致这种关系的原因。因为智力残疾(ID)独立于 ASD,是癫痫的一个危险因素,因此目前的文献对 ASD 和癫痫之间长期以来被理解的独特关系提出了质疑。其次,关于 ASD 中的发育倒退是否与癫痫有关的数据尚不清楚。我们使用来自在线研究注册处的两个队列,共有 6975 名 ASD 儿童,检查了四个 ASD 严重程度衡量标准在驱动与癫痫关系中的独立作用:ID、语言障碍、核心 ASD 症状严重程度和运动功能障碍,同时控制了两个已知的相关因素:年龄和性别。我们还检查了发育倒退和癫痫是否具有独立的统计学联系。在一个队列中,所有四个 ASD 严重程度因素均与癫痫有独立的统计学关联,另一个队列中有三个因素与癫痫有独立的统计学关联。在两个队列中,ID 显示的相对风险(RR)最大。效应大小适中。回归也显示与癫痫有独立的统计学关联,但效应大小较小。与先前的工作类似,ID 显示出在 ASD 儿童中癫痫的 RR 最大。然而,其他 ASD 严重程度标志物也显示出统计学关联,这表明 ASD-癫痫的关联不能简化为 ID 的影响。文献中的不一致可能是由于研究的效力不足,但随着更大样本量的研究进展,临床意义和科学相关性可能取决于效应大小,而不仅仅是统计学意义。自闭症研究 2019 年,12:1251-1259。© 2019 年自闭症国际研究协会,威利期刊,公司。 要点:与一般人群相比,癫痫在自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)患者中的发病率更高。ASD 和癫痫之间的关联很有趣,因为研究这两种疾病的组合可能有助于我们理解遗传、分子和细胞机制,以及两者的治疗方法。最近的研究表明,自闭症患者的智商(IQ)可能单独解释癫痫发病率增加的原因。然而,我们的方法是研究与 ASD 相关的一系列严重程度因素,并在两个 ASD 儿童的大型样本中寻找每个严重程度因素与癫痫之间的相关性。总的来说,我们发现每个严重程度因素——智力残疾的存在、语言异常的存在、ASD 特定症状的严重程度和运动问题的存在——都独立地预测了癫痫风险的小幅度增加,这反驳了智商单独是一个风险因素的观点。我们还检查了癫痫是否与发育倒退有关。尽管 Landau-Kleffner 综合征等严重癫痫综合征已知在发育倒退后会引起类似自闭症的症状,但仍存在争议,即其他形式的癫痫是否与许多癫痫儿童中更常见的发育倒退有关。事实上,我们发现癫痫和发育倒退之间存在小的关联。