Department of Molecular, Cell and Systems Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA.
Central Facility for Advanced Microscopy and Microanalysis, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA.
Environ Res. 2019 Aug;175:156-166. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.05.014. Epub 2019 May 14.
Since their release in 2004, electronic cigarettes (ECs) and their atomizers have undergone significant evolution.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the elemental/metal composition of atomizers in cartomizer and tank style ECs produced over a 5-year period.
Popular cartomizer and tank models of ECs were dissected and photographed using a stereoscopic microscope, and elemental analysis of EC atomizers was done using scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy.
Eight elements/metals were found in most products across and within brands purchased at different times. These included chromium, nickel, copper, silver, tin, silicon, aluminum, and zinc. Iron and lead were found in some but not all products, while manganese, cobalt, molybdenum, titanium, and tungsten were only found in a few of the products. The metals used in various components were often similar in cartomizer and tank models. Filaments were usually chromium and nickel (nichrome), although in some newer products, the filament also contained iron, copper, and manganese. The thick wire in earlier products was usually copper coated with silver, while in some newer products, the thick wire was predominantly nickel. In all products, the wick was silica, and sheaths, when present, were fiberglass (silicon, oxygen, calcium, aluminum, magnesium). Wire-to-wire joints were either brazed or clamped with brass (copper and zinc), and air-tube-to-thick wire joints, when present, were usually soldered with tin. Tank style products generally lacked a thick wire and sheaths.
In general, atomizer components in ECs were remarkably similar over time and between brands. Certain elements/metals were consistently found in most models from all generations, and these should be studied carefully to determine if their transfer to aerosols affects user's health and if their accumulation in trash affects the environment.
自 2004 年问世以来,电子烟及其雾化器经历了显著的演变。
本研究旨在评估和比较在五年期间生产的各种品牌的 cartomizer 和 tank 风格电子烟的雾化器的元素/金属组成。
对流行的电子烟 cartomizer 和 tank 模型进行解剖并使用立体显微镜拍照,使用扫描电子显微镜结合能量色散 X 射线光谱对电子烟雾化器进行元素分析。
在不同时间购买的不同品牌的大多数产品中都发现了八种元素/金属。这些包括铬、镍、铜、银、锡、硅、铝和锌。有些但不是所有产品中都发现了铁和铅,而锰、钴、钼、钛和钨仅在少数产品中发现。各种部件中使用的金属在 cartomizer 和 tank 模型中通常是相似的。灯丝通常是铬和镍(镍铬合金),尽管在一些较新的产品中,灯丝还包含铁、铜和锰。早期产品中的粗线通常是镀银的铜,而在一些较新的产品中,粗线主要是镍。在所有产品中,芯线都是二氧化硅,而护套,如果存在的话,通常是玻璃纤维(硅、氧、钙、铝、镁)。线对线接头是钎焊或用黄铜(铜和锌)夹住,当存在空气管与粗线接头时,通常用锡焊接。tank 风格产品通常没有粗线和护套。
总体而言,电子烟的雾化器组件在时间和品牌之间非常相似。某些元素/金属在大多数来自所有世代的模型中始终存在,应该仔细研究这些元素/金属,以确定它们是否转移到气溶胶中会影响使用者的健康,以及它们在垃圾中的积累是否会影响环境。