• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据 2018 年东京指南行积极腹腔镜胆囊切除术。

Aggressive Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Accordance with the Tokyo Guideline 2018.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Morioka Municipal Hospital, Morioka, Iwate, Japan.

Department of Surgery, Iwate Medical University, Iwate Prefecture, Japan.

出版信息

JSLS. 2021 Jan-Mar;25(1). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2020.00116.

DOI:10.4293/JSLS.2020.00116
PMID:33879993
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8035821/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The Tokyo Guidelines 2018 have been widely adopted since their publication. However, the few reports on clinical outcomes following laparoscopic cholecystectomy have not taken into account the severity of the acute cholecystitis and the patient's general condition, as estimated by the Charlson comorbidity index. This study aimed to assess the relationships between severity, Charlson comorbidity index, and clinical outcomes subsequent to laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

METHODS

We extracted the retrospective data for 370 Japanese patients who underwent emergency or scheduled early laparoscopic cholecystectomy within 72 hours from onset between February 2015 and August 2018. We compared postoperative factors in relationship to severity (grade I versus grade II/III). Then, we made a similar comparison between those with low (< 4) and high Charlson comorbidity index (≥ 4).

RESULTS

According to the Tokyo guideline 2018 levels of severity, there were 282 (76.2%), 61 (16.5%), and 27 (7.3%) patients in grades I, II, and III, respectively. With regards to surgical outcomes, the mean operating time was 62.3 minutes and the mean blood loss was 24.4 mL. The mean hospital stay was 3.6 days, with no mortalities. Blood loss was the only factor affected by severity (20.9 mL versus 60.1 mL, = 0.0164), and operating time was the only factor affected by high Charlson comorbidity index (53.4 versus 67.8 minutes, = 0.0153).

CONCLUSION

Our aggressive strategy is acceptable, and severity and Charlson comorbidity index are not critical factors suggesting the disqualification of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with any grade acute cholecystitis.

摘要

目的

自《东京指南 2018》发布以来,已被广泛采用。然而,少数关于腹腔镜胆囊切除术临床结果的报告并未考虑到急性胆囊炎的严重程度和患者的一般状况,这是由 Charlson 合并症指数来评估的。本研究旨在评估严重程度、Charlson 合并症指数与腹腔镜胆囊切除术后临床结果之间的关系。

方法

我们提取了 2015 年 2 月至 2018 年 8 月期间 370 例日本患者的回顾性数据,这些患者在发病后 72 小时内接受了紧急或择期早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术。我们比较了不同严重程度(I 级与 II/III 级)之间的术后因素。然后,我们比较了 Charlson 合并症指数低(<4)和高(≥4)的患者之间的相似因素。

结果

根据《东京指南 2018》的严重程度分级,I 级、II 级和 III 级患者分别为 282 例(76.2%)、61 例(16.5%)和 27 例(7.3%)。就手术结果而言,平均手术时间为 62.3 分钟,平均出血量为 24.4 毫升。平均住院时间为 3.6 天,无死亡病例。出血量是唯一受严重程度影响的因素(20.9 毫升与 60.1 毫升, = 0.0164),手术时间是唯一受高 Charlson 合并症指数影响的因素(53.4 分钟与 67.8 分钟, = 0.0153)。

结论

我们的积极策略是可以接受的,严重程度和 Charlson 合并症指数并不是任何严重程度急性胆囊炎患者早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术资格的关键因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a14c/8035821/a25116396d5f/LS-JSLS210003F002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a14c/8035821/ac7f348b07e1/LS-JSLS210003F001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a14c/8035821/a25116396d5f/LS-JSLS210003F002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a14c/8035821/ac7f348b07e1/LS-JSLS210003F001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a14c/8035821/a25116396d5f/LS-JSLS210003F002.jpg

相似文献

1
Aggressive Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Accordance with the Tokyo Guideline 2018.根据 2018 年东京指南行积极腹腔镜胆囊切除术。
JSLS. 2021 Jan-Mar;25(1). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2020.00116.
2
The optimal treatment of patients with mild and moderate acute cholecystitis: time for a revision of the Tokyo Guidelines.轻度和中度急性胆囊炎患者的最佳治疗方法:是时候修订东京指南了。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):3858-3863. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5412-x. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
3
Acute cholecystitis: comparing clinical outcomes with TG13 severity and intended laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy in difficult operative cases.急性胆囊炎:比较 TG13 严重程度与困难手术中腹腔镜与开腹胆囊切除术的临床结局。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Sep;32(9):3943-3948. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6134-z. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
4
Tokyo Guidelines 2013 may be too restrictive and patients with moderate and severe acute cholecystitis can be managed by early cholecystectomy too.《2013东京指南》可能限制过多,中度和重度急性胆囊炎患者也可通过早期胆囊切除术进行治疗。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jul;31(7):2892-2900. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5300-4. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
5
Index cholecystectomy in grade II and III acute calculous cholecystitis is feasible and safe.二级和三级急性结石性胆囊炎的择期胆囊切除术是可行且安全的。
ANZ J Surg. 2015 Nov;85(11):854-9. doi: 10.1111/ans.12986. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
6
Validation of the Tokyo guideline 2018 treatment proposal for acute cholecystitis from a single-center retrospective analysis.基于单中心回顾性分析对《东京指南2018:急性胆囊炎治疗建议》的验证
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2021 Jan;14(1):14-20. doi: 10.1111/ases.12801. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
7
Does the Tokyo guidelines predict the extent of gallbladder inflammation in patients with acute cholecystitis? A single center retrospective analysis.东京指南能否预测急性胆囊炎患者的胆囊炎症程度?一项单中心回顾性分析。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2015 Oct 20;15:142. doi: 10.1186/s12876-015-0365-4.
8
Predicting length of stay and conversion to open cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis using the 2013 Tokyo Guidelines in a US population.在美国人群中使用2013年东京指南预测急性胆囊炎的住院时间及转为开腹胆囊切除术的情况。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2015 Nov;22(11):795-801. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.284. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
9
Clinical outcomes of octogenarians according to preoperative disease severity and comorbidities after laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.高龄患者腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的术前疾病严重程度和合并症与临床结局的相关性。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2020 Jun;27(6):307-314. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.719. Epub 2020 Feb 29.
10
Impact of the Tokyo guidelines on the management of patients with acute calculous cholecystitis.《东京指南》对急性结石性胆囊炎患者管理的影响。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Dec;24(12):1857-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.05923.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Solve study: a study to capture global variations in practices concerning laparoscopic cholecystectomy.研究目的:旨在获取全球范围内腹腔镜胆囊切除术实践变化的研究。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Dec;36(12):9032-9045. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09367-8. Epub 2022 Jun 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Less is more in the difficult gallbladder: recent evolution of subtotal cholecystectomy in a single HPB unit.在复杂胆囊手术中,少即是多:单一肝脏胰腺胆管外科单元中胆囊次全切除术的最新进展
Surg Endosc. 2021 Jul;35(7):3249-3257. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07759-2. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
2
Validation of the Tokyo guideline 2018 treatment proposal for acute cholecystitis from a single-center retrospective analysis.基于单中心回顾性分析对《东京指南2018:急性胆囊炎治疗建议》的验证
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2021 Jan;14(1):14-20. doi: 10.1111/ases.12801. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
3
Advances in the management of acute cholecystitis.
急性胆囊炎管理的进展
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2019 Feb 19;3(3):247-253. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12240. eCollection 2019 May.
4
Optimum timing of emergency cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis in England: population-based cohort study.英格兰急性胆囊炎行急诊胆囊切除术的最佳时机:基于人群的队列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Aug;33(8):2495-2502. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6537-x. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
5
Pre-surgery age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index is associated with worse outcomes in acute cholecystitis.术前年龄校正的查尔森合并症指数与急性胆囊炎的较差预后相关。
Dig Liver Dis. 2019 Jun;51(6):858-863. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2018.10.002. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
6
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage for acute cholecystitis in high risk patients (CHOCOLATE): multicentre randomised clinical trial.腹腔镜胆囊切除术与经皮胆囊穿刺引流术治疗高危患者急性胆囊炎(CHOCOLATE):多中心随机临床试验。
BMJ. 2018 Oct 8;363:k3965. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k3965.
7
Tokyo Guidelines 2018: management bundles for acute cholangitis and cholecystitis.东京指南 2018:急性胆管炎和胆囊炎的管理措施集
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018 Jan;25(1):96-100. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.519. Epub 2017 Dec 16.
8
Subtotal Cholecystectomy-"Fenestrating" vs "Reconstituting" Subtypes and the Prevention of Bile Duct Injury: Definition of the Optimal Procedure in Difficult Operative Conditions.胆囊次全切除术——“开窗式”与“重建式”亚型及胆管损伤的预防:困难手术条件下最佳术式的定义
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Jan;222(1):89-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.09.019. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
9
Percutaneous cholecystostomy in critically ill patients with acute cholecystitis: complications and late outcome.经皮胆囊造口术治疗危重症急性胆囊炎患者:并发症及远期结局。
Clin Radiol. 2014 Jun;69(6):e247-52. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2014.01.012. Epub 2014 Mar 1.
10
Clinical outcomes of a percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis: a multicentre analysis.经皮胆囊造口术治疗急性胆囊炎的临床疗效:多中心分析。
HPB (Oxford). 2013 Jul;15(7):511-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2012.00610.x. Epub 2012 Nov 19.