Department of Electrophysiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Strümpelstr. 39, Leipzig, Germany.
Leipzig Heart Institute, Russenstraße 69A, Leipzig, Germany.
Europace. 2019 Aug 1;21(8):1220-1228. doi: 10.1093/europace/euz112.
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging has long been a contraindication for patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED). Recent studies support the feasibility and safety for non-thoracic magnetic resonance imaging, but data for CMR are sparse. The aim of the current study was to determine the safety in patients with magnetic resonance (MR)-conditional or non-MR-conditional CIED and to develop a best practice approach.
All patients with a CIED undergoing CMR imaging (1.5 T) between April 2014 and April 2017 were included in the study. Devices were programmed according to the standardized protocol directly before and after the CMR examination. Follow-up interrogation was performed 6 months after CMR examination. Results were compared with a large, reference cohort of CIED patients not undergoing any MR examination. A total of 200 consecutive patients with a CIED (non-MR-conditional, n = 103) were included in the study. Directly after CMR imaging, one device failure (0.5%, battery status = end of service) was noted necessitating premature generator replacement. In three patients (2%) of pacemaker/implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) carriers a sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) occurred during CMR imaging. Ten ICD showed a decrease in battery capacity immediately after CMR. Overall, the reference cohort showed comparable changes of CIED function during follow-up.
With adherence to a standardized protocol and established exclusion criteria CMR imaging could safely be performed in patients with a CIED. The potential risks of device malfunction necessitate the presence of a device trained individual during the entire CMR examination. If there is a history of VT storm the attendance of an experienced cardiologist, should be mandatory.
心血管磁共振(CMR)成像长期以来一直是心脏植入式电子设备(CIED)患者的禁忌症。最近的研究支持非胸部磁共振成像的可行性和安全性,但有关 CMR 的数据很少。本研究旨在确定具有磁共振(MR)条件或非 MR 条件的 CIED 患者的安全性,并制定最佳实践方法。
本研究纳入了 2014 年 4 月至 2017 年 4 月期间所有接受 CMR 成像(1.5 T)的 CIED 患者。根据标准化方案在 CMR 检查前后对设备进行编程。在 CMR 检查后 6 个月进行随访询问。将结果与未进行任何 MR 检查的大型 CIED 患者参考队列进行比较。本研究共纳入 200 例连续的 CIED 患者(非 MR 条件,n = 103)。直接在 CMR 成像后,发现 1 例设备故障(0.5%,电池状态=服务结束),需要提前更换发电机。在 3 例起搏器/植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)携带者中,在 CMR 成像期间发生持续室性心动过速(VT)。10 例 ICD 在 CMR 后立即显示电池容量下降。总体而言,参考队列在随访期间显示出可比的 CIED 功能变化。
如果遵守标准化协议和既定排除标准,CIED 患者可以安全地进行 CMR 成像。设备故障的潜在风险需要在整个 CMR 检查过程中设备受过培训的人员在场。如果有 VT 风暴病史,则应强制由经验丰富的心脏病专家出席。