Hospital General de Zona Numero 30, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Eje 4 Sur, Av. Pdte. Plutarco Elías Calles 473, Col. Santa Anita, Alcaldía Iztacalco, C.P. 08300 Ciudad de México, Mexico; Hospital General de Ticoman, Servicios de Salud Publica de la Ciudad de Mexico, Plan de San Luis S/N, Col. Ticoman, Alcaldía Gustavo A. Madero, C.P. 07330 Ciudad de México, Mexico.
Hospital General de Ticoman, Servicios de Salud Publica de la Ciudad de Mexico, Plan de San Luis S/N, Col. Ticoman, Alcaldía Gustavo A. Madero, C.P. 07330 Ciudad de México, Mexico.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019 Jul;153:49-54. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.05.019. Epub 2019 May 24.
To evaluate the clinical accuracy of novel indices visceral adiposity index (VAI) and body adiposity index (BAI) to identify patients with impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and compare with its individual components and other obesity indicators.
A cross-sectional study was conducted in Mexican population. Body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, hip circumference, triglycerides (TG), High density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), VAI, BAI, waist to hip ratio (WHR) and waist to height ratio (WHtR) were determined. We plotted a receiver operating characteristic curves to assess the abilities to discriminate subjects with IFG from those with normal glucose tolerance (NGT) of the measurements. A binary logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the strength of association with IFG.
A total of 280 individuals were included, from which 144 (51.3%) have IFG; the mean age was 47.14 years and 164 (55.5%) were females. Compared with NGT subjects, the participants with IFG had significantly higher levels of BMI, WHtR, VAI, BAI and TG. The measurements with highest area under the curve were TG, (0.631, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.566-0.697) VAI (0.628, 95% CI 0.563-0.693) and WHtR (0.622, 95% CI 0.557-0.688) and in the adjusted binary logistic regression model, were found to be independently associated with IFG, Odds Ratio of 2.665, (95% CI 1.567-4.533) 2.567 (95% CI 1.527-4.317) and 2.171 (95% CI 1.102-4.276) respectively.
Our data provide evidence that TG, VAI and WHtR could be considered potential tools for the risk assessment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in this population.
评估新型指标内脏脂肪指数(VAI)和身体脂肪指数(BAI)在识别空腹血糖受损(IFG)患者方面的临床准确性,并与各自的组成部分和其他肥胖指标进行比较。
在墨西哥人群中进行了一项横断面研究。测定了体重指数(BMI)、腰围、臀围、甘油三酯(TG)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)、VAI、BAI、腰臀比(WHR)和腰高比(WHtR)。我们绘制了受试者工作特征曲线,以评估这些指标区分 IFG 患者和正常糖耐量(NGT)患者的能力。进行二元逻辑回归分析以确定与 IFG 的关联强度。
共纳入 280 人,其中 144 人(51.3%)有 IFG;平均年龄为 47.14 岁,164 人(55.5%)为女性。与 NGT 受试者相比,IFG 患者的 BMI、WHtR、VAI、BAI 和 TG 水平显著更高。曲线下面积最高的指标是 TG(0.631,95%置信区间 [CI] 0.566-0.697)、VAI(0.628,95% CI 0.563-0.693)和 WHtR(0.622,95% CI 0.557-0.688),且在调整后的二元逻辑回归模型中,与 IFG 独立相关,比值比分别为 2.665(95% CI 1.567-4.533)、2.567(95% CI 1.527-4.317)和 2.171(95% CI 1.102-4.276)。
我们的数据提供了证据表明,TG、VAI 和 WHtR 可被视为该人群中 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)风险评估的潜在工具。