Lambert R S, George R B
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1987 Aug;136(2):316-9. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/136.2.316.
This study evaluates the usefulness of enzyme immunoassay (EIA) as a screening test for serum antibodies to Histoplasma capsulatum and Blastomycoses dermatitidis and compares the results using this assay with those using complement fixation (CF), immunodiffusion (ID), and radioimmunoassay (RIA), in 12 patients with active histoplasmosis, 12 with active blastomycosis, 28 with other acute or chronic lung diseases and 25 healthy blood donors from an endemic area; EIA was as sensitive as RIA and more sensitive than CF and ID in the 24 patients with active fungal infections. The specificity of EIA was equal to that of the other serologic tests. We conclude that EIA is a useful screening test for serum antibodies to H. capsulatum and B. dermatitidis that avoids some of the problems associated with other sensitive assays such as RIA. A negative EIA result is evidence against invasive histoplasmosis or blastomycosis and suggests an alternative diagnosis.
本研究评估酶免疫测定法(EIA)作为荚膜组织胞浆菌和皮炎芽生菌血清抗体筛查试验的效用,并将该测定法的结果与补体结合试验(CF)、免疫扩散试验(ID)和放射免疫测定法(RIA)的结果进行比较,研究对象包括12例活动性组织胞浆菌病患者、12例活动性芽生菌病患者、28例患有其他急性或慢性肺部疾病的患者以及25名来自疫区的健康献血者;在24例活动性真菌感染患者中,EIA与RIA一样敏感,且比CF和ID更敏感。EIA的特异性与其他血清学试验相同。我们得出结论,EIA是一种用于检测荚膜组织胞浆菌和皮炎芽生菌血清抗体的有用筛查试验,它避免了与其他敏感测定法(如RIA)相关的一些问题。EIA结果为阴性可排除侵袭性组织胞浆菌病或芽生菌病,并提示需进行其他诊断。