Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
J Prev Interv Community. 2020 Jan-Mar;48(1):64-80. doi: 10.1080/10852352.2019.1617523. Epub 2019 May 29.
Religion and spirituality often become relevant after the death of a loved one. In light of the multidimensionality of religion and spirituality, we investigate the role of communal religiosity in predicting associations between personal religiosity and bereavement outcomes. A mixed-methods analysis of interviews and questionnaires from 33 bereaved adults was conducted. Interview mentions of personal and communal religiosity, and their associations with self-reported religious coping and grief symptoms, were assessed. Personal ( = 0.55, < .01) and communal religiosity ( = 0.50, < .01) predicted positive religious coping, as well as negative religious coping and grief severity ( = 0.53, < .01). In addition, personal religiosity predicted more negative religious coping for participants who expressed low communal religiosity, = 1.58, SE = .15, (28) = 4.08, < .001. After loss, personal religiosity by itself is not necessarily protective. The presence of personal and communal religiosity contributes to positive religious coping, and reduced negative religious coping. However, the absence of communal religiosity indicates vulnerability.
宗教和精神信仰在亲人离世后往往变得尤为重要。鉴于宗教和精神信仰的多维性,我们研究了集体宗教信仰在预测个人宗教信仰与丧亲结果之间的关联中的作用。对 33 名丧亲的成年人进行了访谈和问卷调查的混合方法分析。评估了个人和集体宗教信仰的访谈提及,以及它们与自我报告的宗教应对和悲伤症状之间的关联。个人宗教信仰( = 0.55, <.01)和集体宗教信仰( = 0.50, <.01)预测了积极的宗教应对方式,以及消极的宗教应对方式和悲伤严重程度( = 0.53, <.01)。此外,对于表达低集体宗教信仰的参与者,个人宗教信仰预测了更多的消极宗教应对方式, = 1.58,SE = 0.15,(28) = 4.08, <.001。丧亲后,个人宗教信仰本身并不一定具有保护作用。个人和集体宗教信仰的存在有助于积极的宗教应对,减少消极的宗教应对。然而,集体宗教信仰的缺失表明存在脆弱性。