Department of Computing, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia.
College of Administration and Economic, University of Mosul, Mosul, Iraq.
J Med Syst. 2019 May 29;43(7):207. doi: 10.1007/s10916-019-1336-z.
This paper presents comprehensive insights into mobile patient monitoring systems (MPMSs) from evaluation and benchmarking aspects on the basis of two critical directions. The current evaluation criteria of MPMSs based on the architectural components of MPMSs and possible solutions are discussed. This review highlights four serious issues, namely, multiple evaluation criteria, criterion importance, unmeasurable criteria and data variation, in MPMS benchmarking. Multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) analysis techniques are proposed as effective solutions to solve these issues from a methodological aspect. This methodological aspect involves a framework for benchmarking MPMSs on the basis of MCDM to rank available MPMSs and select a suitable one. The benchmarking framework is discussed in four steps. Firstly, pre-processing and identification procedures are presented. Secondly, the procedure of weight calculation based on the best-worst method (BWM) is described. Thirdly, the development of a benchmark framework by using the VIKOR method is introduced. Lastly, the proposed framework is validated.
本文从评估和基准测试两个关键方向,对移动患者监测系统(MPMS)进行了全面的研究。本文讨论了基于 MPMS 体系结构组件和可能解决方案的 MPMS 当前评估标准。本综述强调了 MPMS 基准测试中的四个严重问题,即多个评估标准、标准重要性、不可衡量的标准和数据变化。多准则决策(MCDM)分析技术被提出作为解决这些问题的有效方法,从方法学的角度来看。该方法涉及基于 MCDM 的 MPMS 基准测试框架,以对现有 MPMS 进行排名并选择合适的 MPMS。基准测试框架分为四个步骤进行讨论。首先,提出了预处理和识别过程。其次,描述了基于最佳最差方法(BWM)的权重计算过程。第三,介绍了使用 VIKOR 方法开发基准框架的过程。最后,验证了所提出的框架。