Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California Division of Research, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA94612, USA.
Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
BMC Public Health. 2019 May 31;19(1):674. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6936-5.
The HealthyFood (HF) program offers members up to 25% cash back monthly on healthy food purchases. In this randomized controlled trial, we tested the efficacy of financial incentives combined with text messages in increasing healthy food purchases among HF members.
Members receiving the lowest (10%) cash back level were randomized to one of six arms: Arm 1 (Usual Care): 10% cash back, no weekly text, standard monthly text; Arm 2: 10% cash back, generic weekly text, standard monthly text; Arm 3: 10% cash back, personalized weekly text, standard monthly text; Arm 4: 25% cash back, personalized weekly text, standard monthly text; Arm 5: 10 + 15%NET cash back, personalized weekly text, standard monthly text; and, Arm 6: 10 + 15%NET cash back, personalized weekly text, unbundled monthly text. In the 10 + 15%NET cash back, the cash back amount was the baseline 10% plus 15% of the net difference between healthy and unhealthy spending. The generic text included information on HF and healthy eating, while the personalized text had individualized feedback on purchases. The standard monthly text contained the cash back amount. The unbundled monthly text included the amount lost due to unhealthy purchases. The primary outcome was the average monthly percent healthy food spending. Secondary outcomes were the percent unhealthy food spending, and the percent healthy and unhealthy food items.
Of the members contacted, 20 opted out, and 2841 met all inclusion criteria. There were no between-arm differences in the examined outcomes. The largest mean (standard deviation) difference in percent healthy spending was between Arm 1 (24.8% [11%]) and Arm 2 (26.8% [13%]), and the largest mean difference in percent unhealthy spending was also between Arm 1 (24.4% [20%]) and Arm 2 (21.7% [17%]), but no differences were statistically significant after correction for multiple comparisons.
None of the tested financial incentive structures or text strategies differentially affected food purchasing. Notably, more than doubling the cash back amount and introducing a financial disincentive for unhealthy purchases did not affect purchasing. These findings speak to the difficulty of changing shopping habits and to the need for innovative strategies to shift complex health behaviors.
NCT02486588 Increasing Engagement with a Healthy Food Benefit. The trial was prospectively registered on July 1, 2015.
HealthyFood(HF)计划为会员提供高达每月健康食品购买额 25%的现金返还。在这项随机对照试验中,我们测试了财务激励与短信相结合,以增加 HF 会员健康食品购买量的效果。
收到最低(10%)现金返还水平的会员被随机分配到六个组之一:第 1 组(常规护理):10%的现金返还,无每周短信,标准每月短信;第 2 组:10%的现金返还,通用每周短信,标准每月短信;第 3 组:10%的现金返还,个性化每周短信,标准每月短信;第 4 组:25%的现金返还,个性化每周短信,标准每月短信;第 5 组:10%+15%NET 现金返还,个性化每周短信,标准每月短信;第 6 组:10%+15%NET 现金返还,个性化每周短信,拆分为每月短信。在 10%+15%NET 现金返还中,现金返还金额为基准的 10%加上健康和不健康支出之间的净差的 15%。通用文本包含有关 HF 和健康饮食的信息,而个性化文本包含对购买的个性化反馈。标准每月文本包含现金返还金额。拆分为每月的文本包含因不健康购买而损失的金额。主要结果是每月健康食品支出的平均百分比。次要结果是不健康食品支出的百分比,以及健康和不健康食品的百分比。
在联系的会员中,有 20 人选择退出,有 2841 人符合所有纳入标准。在检查的结果中,各臂之间没有差异。最大的平均(标准偏差)健康支出百分比差异是在第 1 组(24.8%[11%])和第 2 组(26.8%[13%])之间,最大的不健康支出百分比差异也是在第 1 组(24.4%[20%])和第 2 组(21.7%[17%])之间,但在进行多次比较校正后,没有统计学意义上的差异。
没有一种测试的财务激励结构或短信策略能对食品购买产生不同的影响。值得注意的是,将现金返还金额增加一倍以上,并对不健康购买引入财务惩罚,并没有影响购买行为。这些发现表明改变购物习惯的难度很大,需要创新策略来改变复杂的健康行为。
NCT02486588 提高对健康食品福利的参与度。该试验于 2015 年 7 月 1 日前瞻性注册。