Department of Medicine, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, 2002 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Dig Dis Sci. 2019 Sep;64(9):2514-2526. doi: 10.1007/s10620-019-05674-8. Epub 2019 May 31.
Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common and expensive condition. Improving quality of care in AP is vital to minimizing cost and improving patient outcomes. However, there has been little work accomplished toward developing and validating explicit quality indicators (QIs) in AP.
To define quality of care in patients with AP by developing explicit QIs using standardized techniques.
We used the UCLA/RAND Delphi panel approach to combine a comprehensive literature review with the collective judgment of experts to identify a defined set of process measures for AP.
We produced 164 candidate QIs after a comprehensive literature review. After Delphi review, 75 had a median rating ≥ 7. We excluded 11 QIs where the disagreement index exceeded 1.0 and combined indicators overlapping in content to produce a final list of 22 QIs. Overall, 8 QIs related to diagnosis, prevention, or determination of etiology, 2 QIs focused on determination of severity, 3 QIs captured fluid resuscitation, 2 QIs measured nutrition, 1 QI use of antibiotics, and 6 QIs captured endoscopic or surgical management.
We have developed 22 QIs spanning the spectrum of AP management including diagnosis, risk stratification, and pharmacological and endoscopic therapy. These QIs will facilitate future quality improvement by practitioners and organizations who treat patients with AP and further identify areas that are amenable to improvement to enhance patient care. We anticipate that this QI set will represent the first step in determining a framework for demonstrating value in the care of patients with AP.
急性胰腺炎(AP)是一种常见且昂贵的疾病。改善 AP 的护理质量对于最大限度地降低成本和改善患者预后至关重要。然而,在开发和验证 AP 明确的质量指标(QIs)方面,几乎没有取得什么进展。
通过使用标准化技术开发明确的 QIs 来定义 AP 患者的护理质量。
我们使用加州大学洛杉矶分校/兰德德尔菲小组方法,将全面的文献回顾与专家的集体判断相结合,确定了一组针对 AP 的明确过程指标。
经过全面的文献回顾,我们产生了 164 个候选 QIs。经过德尔菲审查,75 个指标的中位数评分为≥7。我们排除了 11 个指标,其分歧指数超过 1.0,并将内容重叠的指标合并,最终产生了 22 个 QIs 的清单。总体而言,有 8 个 QIs 与诊断、预防或确定病因有关,2 个 QIs 侧重于确定严重程度,3 个 QIs 捕捉液体复苏,2 个 QIs 测量营养,1 个 QI 使用抗生素,6 个 QIs 捕捉内镜或手术管理。
我们已经制定了 22 个 QIs,涵盖了 AP 管理的各个方面,包括诊断、风险分层以及药物和内镜治疗。这些 QIs 将促进未来从业者和治疗 AP 患者的组织进行质量改进,并进一步确定可以改进以提高患者护理的领域。我们预计,这一 QI 集将代表确定 AP 患者护理价值框架的第一步。