Suppr超能文献

Comparison of recovery after halothane or alfentanil anaesthesia for minor surgery.

作者信息

Moss E, Hindmarch I, Pain A J, Edmondson R S

机构信息

Department of Anaesthetics, Leeds General Infirmary.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 1987 Aug;59(8):970-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/59.8.970.

Abstract

Recovery after anaesthesia was assessed using the Maddox Wing Test (MW), Critical Flicker Fusion Threshold (CFF), Choice Reaction Time (CRT), Line Analogue Rating Scales (LARS), a Tracking Test and a test of Semantic Memory in 44 patients who had undergone minor gynaecological surgery. The patients were allocated randomly to one of two groups and received either methohexitone, nitrous oxide, oxygen and halothane or methohexitone, alfentanil, nitrous oxide and oxygen. Immediate recovery was more rapid in the alfentanil group (P less than 0.01), but apnoea (P less than 0.05) and hiccups (P less than 0.05) were more common. Except for the CFF test, which showed the alfentanil patients to be less sedated than the halothane patients on the morning after anaesthesia (P less than 0.05), the results of the tests were similar in both groups and showed, initially, substantial impairment of psychomotor functions which gradually returned to baseline values. This comparison with halothane anaesthesia indicates that a technique using methohexitone and alfentanil is suitable for day-case surgery.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验