• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床指南决定因素问卷是为支持定制实施计划而开发和验证的。

The Clinician Guideline Determinants Questionnaire was developed and validated to support tailored implementation planning.

机构信息

Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Sep;113:129-136. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.05.024. Epub 2019 May 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.05.024
PMID:31152863
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this research was to generate and validate a questionnaire that identifies determinants of guideline use from the clinician perspective.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

From January 2017 to March 2018, a seven-member six-country multidisciplinary team used a five-step multimethod design to search for and compile determinant frameworks, map items to determinants (content validity), select the best items for each determinant (content validity), refine wording of determinants and items (face validity), merge or separate items (construct validity), and review the final questionnaire.

RESULTS

The Clinician Guideline Determinants Questionnaire includes four sections: clinician demographic information (including two determinants: attitudes about/experience with guidelines), 26 close-ended items reflecting clinician- and guideline-specific determinants, four open-ended items reflecting enablers and barriers perceived as most important, and three items on learning style (preferred sources of guideline information).

CONCLUSION

The Clinician Guideline Determinants Questionnaire is a comprehensive, validated instrument that addresses multiple potential determinants specific to guideline use from a clinician perspective. The Questionnaire can be used at multiple time points in the guideline development cycle to assess determinants of the use of new, updated, or adapted guidelines and before and after interventions to assess their impact on the determinants of guideline use. In future research, we will establish psychometric properties of the new questionnaire.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在生成并验证一份从临床医生角度出发识别指南使用决定因素的问卷。

研究设计和设置

2017 年 1 月至 2018 年 3 月,一个由七名来自六个国家的多学科成员组成的团队采用五步多方法设计,用于搜索和编纂决定因素框架,将项目映射到决定因素(内容效度),为每个决定因素选择最佳项目(内容效度),完善决定因素和项目的措辞(表面效度),合并或分离项目(结构效度),以及审查最终问卷。

结果

临床医生指南决定因素问卷包括四个部分:临床医生人口统计学信息(包括两个决定因素:对指南的态度/使用经验)、26 个反映临床医生和指南特定决定因素的封闭式项目、四个反映被认为最重要的促进因素和障碍的开放式项目,以及三个关于学习风格(首选指南信息来源)的项目。

结论

临床医生指南决定因素问卷是一种全面、经过验证的工具,从临床医生的角度出发,针对指南使用的多个潜在决定因素进行了评估。该问卷可以在指南制定周期的多个时间点使用,以评估新的、更新的或改编的指南使用的决定因素,以及在干预前后评估其对指南使用决定因素的影响。在未来的研究中,我们将确定新问卷的心理测量学特性。

相似文献

1
The Clinician Guideline Determinants Questionnaire was developed and validated to support tailored implementation planning.临床指南决定因素问卷是为支持定制实施计划而开发和验证的。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Sep;113:129-136. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.05.024. Epub 2019 May 29.
2
Questionnaires used to assess barriers of clinical guideline use among physicians are not comprehensive, reliable, or valid: a scoping review.用于评估医生临床指南使用障碍的问卷并不全面、可靠或有效:一项范围综述。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Jun;86:25-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.12.012. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
3
A nutrition care process knowledge, attitudes, practices, and perceived barriers questionnaire.
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2017;26(5):781-787. doi: 10.6133/apjcn.102016.02.
4
The assessment of safe nursing care: development and psychometric evaluation.安全护理评估:开发与心理测量学评价
J Nurs Manag. 2017 Jan;25(1):22-36. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12424. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
5
Development and Pretesting of a Questionnaire to Assess Patient Experiences and Satisfaction with Medications (PESaM Questionnaire).评估患者用药体验和满意度问卷(PESaM 问卷)的编制和预测试。
Patient. 2017 Oct;10(5):629-642. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0234-z.
6
The family experiences of in-hospital care questionnaire in severe traumatic brain injury (FECQ-TBI): a validation study.重型颅脑损伤住院护理问卷的家庭体验(FECQ-TBI):一项效度研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Nov 28;16(1):675. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1884-6.
7
Measuring evidence-based practice in physical therapy: translation, adaptation, further development, validation, and reliability test of a questionnaire.测量物理治疗中的循证实践:问卷的翻译、改编、进一步开发、验证和可靠性测试。
Phys Ther. 2013 Jun;93(6):819-32. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20120270. Epub 2013 Feb 21.
8
Content validity of the integrative medicine attitude questionnaire: perspectives of a Hong Kong Chinese expert panel.中西医结合医学态度问卷的内容效度:香港华人专家小组的观点
J Altern Complement Med. 2007 Jun;13(5):563-70. doi: 10.1089/acm.2007.6222.
9
Number and type of guideline implementation tools varies by guideline, clinical condition, country of origin, and type of developer organization: content analysis of guidelines.指南实施工具的数量和类型因指南、临床情况、来源国和开发者组织类型而异:指南的内容分析。
Implement Sci. 2017 Nov 15;12(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0668-7.
10
Development and Testing of the Nurse Manager EBP Competency Scale.护士管理者循证实践能力量表的开发与测试
West J Nurs Res. 2018 Feb;40(2):175-190. doi: 10.1177/0193945917728249. Epub 2017 Aug 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring occupational therapists' use of movement guidelines for young children with disabilities.探索职业治疗师对残疾幼儿运动指导方针的运用。
Can J Occup Ther. 2025 Sep;92(3):185-195. doi: 10.1177/00084174251318200. Epub 2025 Feb 10.
2
Pediatric head injury guideline use in Sweden: a cross-sectional survey on determinants for successful implementation of a clinical practice guideline.瑞典儿科头部损伤指南的使用情况:一项关于成功实施临床实践指南的决定因素的横断面调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Aug 21;24(1):965. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11423-z.
3
Prospective Teacher's Voice Questionnaire (PTVQ): Development of a Questionnaire to Assess Training-Related Voice Symptoms Among Prospective Teachers.
未来教师嗓音问卷(PTVQ):一份用于评估未来教师中与训练相关嗓音症状的问卷的编制
J Voice. 2024 Aug 13. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.07.027.
4
Adherence to evidence-based implementation of antimicrobial treatment guidelines among prescribers in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.撒哈拉以南非洲地区处方医生对基于证据实施抗菌治疗指南的依从性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2023 Nov 7;16(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s40545-023-00634-0.
5
Where do psychologists turn to inform clinical decisions? Audience segmentation to guide dissemination strategies.心理学家从何处获取信息以指导临床决策?受众细分以指导传播策略。
Implement Res Pract. 2023 Jul 7;4:26334895231185376. doi: 10.1177/26334895231185376. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
6
Assessing Barriers and Facilitators for Implementing Clinical Practice Guidelines in Middle Eastern and North African Region: Delphi Study.评估中东和北非地区实施临床实践指南的障碍与促进因素:德尔菲研究
J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 3;12(15):5113. doi: 10.3390/jcm12155113.
7
Physician-level determinants of HCV screening during pregnancy in a U.S. sample.美国样本中医生层面决定丙型肝炎病毒筛查在孕期进行的因素。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Jun;309(6):2491-2498. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07146-x. Epub 2023 Jul 16.
8
Implementation strategies and outcomes for occupational therapy in adult stroke rehabilitation: a scoping review.成人中风康复中职业治疗的实施策略和结果:范围综述。
Implement Sci. 2021 Dec 18;16(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01178-0.
9
Knowledge of and Compliance With Guidelines in the Management of Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Survey of Chinese Urologists.非肌层浸润性膀胱癌管理指南的认知与遵循情况:中国泌尿外科医生的一项调查
Front Oncol. 2021 Oct 27;11:735704. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.735704. eCollection 2021.
10
A systematic review and quality assessment of complementary and alternative medicine recommendations in insomnia clinical practice guidelines.系统评价和质量评估在失眠临床实践指南中的补充和替代医学建议。
BMC Complement Med Ther. 2021 Feb 8;21(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12906-021-03223-3.