Suppr超能文献

除草剂对非靶标微生物的影响:迈向新型生物标志物?

Effects of herbicide on non-target microorganisms: Towards a new class of biomarkers?

机构信息

Univ. Perpignan Via Domitia, Biocapteurs-Analyses-Environnement, 66860 Perpignan, France; Laboratoire de Biodiversité et Biotechnologies Microbiennes, USR 3579 Sorbonne Universités (UPMC) Paris 6 et CNRS Observatoire Océanologique, 66650 Banyuls-sur-Mer, France; AgroSup Dijon, INRA, Univ. Bourgogne, Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté, F-21065 Dijon, France.

AgroSup Dijon, INRA, Univ. Bourgogne, Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté, F-21065 Dijon, France.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2019 Sep 20;684:314-325. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.230. Epub 2019 May 20.

Abstract

Conventional agriculture still relies on the general use of agrochemicals (herbicides, fungicides and insecticides) to control various pests (weeds, fungal pathogens and insects), to ensure the yield of crop and to feed a constantly growing population. The generalized use of pesticides in agriculture leads to the contamination of soil and other connected environmental resources. The persistence of pesticide residues in soil is identified as a major threat for in-soil living organisms that are supporting an important number of ecosystem services. Although authorities released pesticides on the market only after their careful and thorough evaluation, the risk assessment for in-soil living organisms is unsatisfactory, particularly for microorganisms for which pesticide toxicity is solely considered by one global test measuring N mineralization. Recently, European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) underlined the lack of standardized methods to assess pesticide ecotoxicological effects on soil microorganisms. Within this context, there is an obvious need to develop innovative microbial markers sensitive to pesticide exposure. Biomarkers that reveal direct effects of pesticides on microorganisms are often viewed as the panacea. Such biomarkers can only be developed for pesticides having a mode of action inhibiting a specific enzyme not only found in the targeted organisms but also in microorganisms which are considered as "non-target organisms" by current regulations. This review explores possible ways of innovation to develop such biomarkers for herbicides. We scanned the herbicide classification by considering the mode of action, the targeted enzyme and the ecotoxicological effects of each class of active substance in order to identify those that can be tracked using sensitive microbial markers.

摘要

传统农业仍然依赖于广泛使用农药(除草剂、杀菌剂和杀虫剂)来控制各种病虫害(杂草、真菌病原体和昆虫),以确保作物的产量并养活不断增长的人口。农业中广泛使用农药会导致土壤和其他相关环境资源受到污染。农药残留在土壤中的持久性被认为是对支持大量生态系统服务的土壤生物的主要威胁。尽管有关部门在仔细和彻底评估后才将农药投放市场,但对土壤生物的风险评估并不令人满意,特别是对于微生物而言,其农药毒性仅通过一种测量 N 矿化的全球测试来评估。最近,欧洲食品安全局 (EFSA) 强调缺乏评估农药对土壤微生物的生态毒理学影响的标准化方法。在这种情况下,显然需要开发对农药暴露敏感的创新微生物标志物。揭示农药对微生物直接影响的生物标志物通常被视为万灵药。此类生物标志物只能为具有作用模式的农药开发,该模式不仅抑制目标生物中发现的特定酶,而且还抑制当前法规视为“非目标生物”的微生物中的特定酶。本综述探讨了开发此类除草剂生物标志物的可能创新方法。我们通过考虑作用模式、靶向酶以及每种活性物质类别的生态毒理学效应来扫描除草剂分类,以确定可以使用敏感微生物标志物跟踪的那些物质。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验