• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[调整后的发病群组:基层医疗中慢性病患者按风险水平划分的特征及共病情况]

[Adjusted morbidity groups: Characteristics and comorbidities in patients with chronic conditions according to their risk level in Primary Care].

作者信息

Barrio-Cortes Jaime, Del Cura-González Isabel, Martínez-Martín Miguel, López-Rodríguez Carmen, Jaime-Sisó María Ángeles, Suárez-Fernández Carmen

机构信息

Programa de Doctorado en Medicina y Cirugía, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, España; Unidad de Apoyo a la Investigación, Gerencia Asistencial de Atención Primaria, Madrid, España.

Unidad de Apoyo a la Investigación, Gerencia Asistencial de Atención Primaria, Madrid, España; Red de Investigación en servicios sanitarios en enfermedades crónicas (REDISSEC), Madrid, España; Área Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, España.

出版信息

Aten Primaria. 2020 Feb;52(2):86-95. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2018.12.007. Epub 2019 May 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.aprim.2018.12.007
PMID:31153669
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7025976/
Abstract

AIMS

To describe the characteristics of patients with chronic conditions according to their risk levels assigned by the adjusted morbidity groups (AMG). To analyse the factors associated with a high risk level and to study their effect.

DESIGN

Observational cross-sectional study with an analytical focus.

LOCATION

Primary care (PC), Madrid Health Service.

PARTICIPANTS

Population of 18,107 patients stratified by their risk levels with the AMG in the computerised clinical records of Madrid PC.

MAIN MEASUREMENTS

The variables studied were: socio-demographic, clinical-nursing care and use of services. Univariate, bivariate, and multivariate analysis were performed.

RESULTS

Of the 18,107 patients, 9,866(54.4%) were identified as chronic patients, with 444 (4.5%) stratified as high risk, 1784 (18,1%) as medium risk, and 7,638 (77.4%) as low risk. The high risk patients, compared with medium and low risk, had an older mean age [77.8 (SD=12.9), 72.1 (SD=12.9), 50.6 (SD=19.4)], lower percentage of women (52.3%, 65%, 61.1%), a higher number of chronic diseases [6.7 (SD=2.4), 4.3 (SD=1.5), 1.9 (SD=1.1)], polymedication (79.1%, 43.3%, 6.2%), and contact with PC [33.9 (28), 21.4 (17.3), 7.9 (9.9)] (P<.01). In the multivariate analysis, the high risk level was independently related to age>65 [1.43 (1.03-1.99), male gender (OR=3.46, 95% CI=2.64-4.52), immobility (OR=6.33, 95% CI=4.40-9.11), number of chronic conditions (OR=2.60, 95% CI=2.41-2.81), and PC contact>7 times (OR=1.95, 95% CI=1.36-2.80)] (P<.01).

CONCLUSIONS

More than half of the population is classified by the AMG as a chronic, and it is stratified into 3 risk levels that show differences in gender, age, functional impairment, need for care, morbidity, complexity, and use of Primary Care services. Age>65, male gender, immobility, number of chronic conditions, and contact with PC>7 times were the factors associated with high risk.

摘要

目的

根据调整后的发病组(AMG)分配的风险水平描述慢性病患者的特征。分析与高风险水平相关的因素并研究其影响。

设计

以分析为重点的观察性横断面研究。

地点

马德里卫生服务中心的初级保健(PC)部门。

参与者

马德里初级保健计算机化临床记录中按AMG风险水平分层的18107名患者。

主要测量指标

研究的变量包括:社会人口统计学、临床护理和服务使用情况。进行了单变量、双变量和多变量分析。

结果

在18107名患者中,9866名(54.4%)被确定为慢性病患者,其中444名(4.5%)被分层为高风险,1784名(18.1%)为中等风险,7638名(77.4%)为低风险。与中等和低风险患者相比,高风险患者的平均年龄更大[77.8(标准差=12.9)、72.1(标准差=12.9)、50.6(标准差=19.4)],女性比例更低(52.3%、65%、61.1%),慢性病数量更多[6.7(标准差=2.4)、4.3(标准差=1.5)、1.9(标准差=1.1)],多重用药情况更严重(79.1%、43.3%、6.2%),与初级保健的接触更频繁[33.9(28)、21.4(17.3)、7.9(9.9)](P<0.01)。在多变量分析中,高风险水平与年龄>65岁[1.43(1.03 - 1.99)]、男性性别(比值比=3.46,95%置信区间=2.64 - 4.52)、行动不便(比值比=6.33,95%置信区间=4.40 - 9.11)、慢性病数量(比值比=2.60,95%置信区间=2.41 - 2.81)以及与初级保健接触>7次(比值比=1.95,95%置信区间=1.36 - 2.80)独立相关(P<0.01)。

结论

超过一半的人群被AMG分类为慢性病患者,并被分层为3个风险水平,这些水平在性别、年龄、功能障碍、护理需求、发病率、复杂性以及初级保健服务使用方面存在差异。年龄>65岁、男性性别、行动不便、慢性病数量以及与初级保健接触>7次是与高风险相关的因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dba/7025976/dea0e3646b6b/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dba/7025976/dea0e3646b6b/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dba/7025976/dea0e3646b6b/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
[Adjusted morbidity groups: Characteristics and comorbidities in patients with chronic conditions according to their risk level in Primary Care].[调整后的发病群组:基层医疗中慢性病患者按风险水平划分的特征及共病情况]
Aten Primaria. 2020 Feb;52(2):86-95. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2018.12.007. Epub 2019 May 29.
2
[Chronic diseases in the paediatric population: Comorbidities and use of primary care services].[儿科人群中的慢性病:合并症与初级保健服务的利用]
An Pediatr (Engl Ed). 2020 Sep;93(3):183-193. doi: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2019.12.019. Epub 2020 Mar 14.
3
Chronic diseases in the geriatric population: morbidity and use of primary care services according to risk level.老年人群中的慢性病:根据风险水平的发病率和初级保健服务的使用情况。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Apr 26;21(1):278. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02217-7.
4
Use of primary and hospital care health services by chronic patients according to risk level by adjusted morbidity groups.根据调整后的发病风险组,慢性病患者对初级保健和医院保健服务的使用情况。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct 3;21(1):1046. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07020-z.
5
Comorbidities and use of health services in people with diabetes mellitus according to risk levels by adjusted morbidity groups.根据调整后的发病风险组,糖尿病患者的合并症及卫生服务利用情况。
BMC Endocr Disord. 2024 Jul 16;24(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12902-024-01634-0.
6
[Health services utilization in Primary Care in patients with chronic conditions according to risk levels].[根据风险水平对慢性病患者初级保健中卫生服务利用情况的研究]
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2019 Sep 6;93:e201909082.
7
Use of hospital care services by chronic patients according to their characteristics and risk levels by adjusted morbidity groups.根据调整后的发病风险组,按慢性病患者的特征和风险水平使用医院护理服务。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 3;17(2):e0262666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262666. eCollection 2022.
8
[Validity of adjusted morbidity groups with respect to clinical risk groups in the field of primary care].[基层医疗领域中调整后的发病群组相对于临床风险群组的有效性]
Aten Primaria. 2019 Mar;51(3):153-161. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2017.09.012. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
9
Adjusted morbidity groups and survival: a retrospective cohort study of primary care patients with chronic conditions.调整后的发病群组和生存情况:一项针对患有慢性病的初级保健患者的回顾性队列研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Apr 20;24(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02059-9.
10
[Impact of cardiovascular risk factors on the consumption of resources in Primary Care according to Clinical Risk Groups].[根据临床风险组,心血管危险因素对基层医疗中资源消耗的影响]
Aten Primaria. 2019 Apr;51(4):218-229. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2017.11.008. Epub 2018 Jun 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Health Literacy and Medication Adherence in Polypharmacy: A Systematic Review for Clinical Practice.多病用药情况下的健康素养与用药依从性:一项临床实践的系统评价
Cureus. 2025 Jul 19;17(7):e88301. doi: 10.7759/cureus.88301. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Factors associated with prescription of modern antidiabetics in newly diagnosed patients with type 2 diabetes. a real-world data study in a Spanish region.新诊断2型糖尿病患者现代抗糖尿病药物处方的相关因素。西班牙某地区的一项真实世界数据研究。
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jul 11;16:1530139. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1530139. eCollection 2025.
3
Comorbidities and use of health services in people with diabetes mellitus according to risk levels by adjusted morbidity groups.

本文引用的文献

1
[Validity of adjusted morbidity groups with respect to clinical risk groups in the field of primary care].[基层医疗领域中调整后的发病群组相对于临床风险群组的有效性]
Aten Primaria. 2019 Mar;51(3):153-161. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2017.09.012. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
2
[Author's reply to letter 'Adjusted morbidity groups: A pending debate'].[作者对信件《调整后的发病组:一场悬而未决的辩论》的回复]
Aten Primaria. 2017 Aug-Sep;49(7):439-440. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2017.05.002. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
3
[Are adjusted morbidity groups concordant with the clinical judgment of intervention in a chronic strategy?].
根据调整后的发病风险组,糖尿病患者的合并症及卫生服务利用情况。
BMC Endocr Disord. 2024 Jul 16;24(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12902-024-01634-0.
4
Prevalence of Steinert's Myotonic Dystrophy and Utilization of Healthcare Services: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study.斯坦纳特型肌强直性营养不良的患病率及医疗服务利用情况:一项基于人群的横断面研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Apr 16;12(8):838. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12080838.
5
Situation of the Elderly Living Alone: Morbidity and Services Provided from the Field of Primary Health Care of Gran Canaria.独居老年人状况:大加那利岛初级卫生保健领域的发病率及提供的服务
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Sep 24;10(10):1861. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10101861.
6
Use of hospital care services by chronic patients according to their characteristics and risk levels by adjusted morbidity groups.根据调整后的发病风险组,按慢性病患者的特征和风险水平使用医院护理服务。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 3;17(2):e0262666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262666. eCollection 2022.
7
Use of primary and hospital care health services by chronic patients according to risk level by adjusted morbidity groups.根据调整后的发病风险组,慢性病患者对初级保健和医院保健服务的使用情况。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct 3;21(1):1046. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07020-z.
8
Chronic diseases in the geriatric population: morbidity and use of primary care services according to risk level.老年人群中的慢性病:根据风险水平的发病率和初级保健服务的使用情况。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Apr 26;21(1):278. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02217-7.
调整后的发病群组与慢性疾病策略中干预措施的临床判断是否一致?
Aten Primaria. 2017 May;49(5):311-312. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2016.10.006. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
4
[Adjusted morbidity groups: A pending debate].[调整后的发病群体:一场悬而未决的辩论]
Aten Primaria. 2017 Aug-Sep;49(7):438-439. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2016.10.009. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
5
[Concordance and usefulness of a stratification system for clinical decision making].[用于临床决策的分层系统的一致性和实用性]
Aten Primaria. 2017 Apr;49(4):240-247. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2016.04.009. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
6
[Adjusted morbidity groups: A new multiple morbidity measurement of use in Primary Care].[调整后的发病群组:一种用于初级保健的新型多重发病测量方法]
Aten Primaria. 2016 Dec;48(10):674-682. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2016.06.003. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
7
Impact of multimorbidity on disability and quality of life in the Spanish older population.多重疾病对西班牙老年人口残疾和生活质量的影响。
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 6;9(11):e111498. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111498. eCollection 2014.
8
Prevalence of multimorbidity in a geographically defined American population: patterns by age, sex, and race/ethnicity.美国某地理区域人群中多重疾病的患病率:按年龄、性别和种族/族裔划分的模式
Mayo Clin Proc. 2014 Oct;89(10):1336-49. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.07.010. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
9
Multi-drug therapy in chronic condition multimorbidity: a systematic review.慢性病共病的多药治疗:一项系统评价
Fam Pract. 2014 Dec;31(6):654-63. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmu056. Epub 2014 Sep 5.
10
Prevalence, determinants and patterns of multimorbidity in primary care: a systematic review of observational studies.初级保健中多种疾病的患病率、决定因素及模式:观察性研究的系统评价
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 21;9(7):e102149. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102149. eCollection 2014.