• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会地位较低的人对享乐主义产品信息更敏感——一项ERP研究的电生理证据

People of Lower Social Status Are More Sensitive to Hedonic Product Information-Electrophysiological Evidence From an ERP Study.

作者信息

Chen Di, Qu Weiguo, Xiang Yanhui, Zhao Jiaxu, Shen Guyu

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China.

Cognition and Human Behavior Key Laboratory of Hunan Province, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 May 15;13:147. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00147. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2019.00147
PMID:31156410
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6530418/
Abstract

Consumer psychology research has shown that individuals of different social statuses have distinctive purchase intentions for different products. Individuals of a high social status will simultaneously measure the symbolic status meaning and utilitarian value of a product, but they will not show strong preferences for any attributes. However, individuals of a low social status show strong purchasing tendency for hedonic products that are associated with symbolic status meaning and could satisfy their spiritual needs. This phenomenon may be due to self-threat, which caused by hedonic products. Based on the above, this study compares the cognitive processing differences of hedonic and utilitarian label products between high- and low-social-status groups by recording event related potentials (ERPs). The results showed that under the P2, P3, and LPP components, the low-social-status group elicited smaller deflections in hedonic label stimuli than in utilitarian label stimuli. The high-social-status group did not show a significant difference in these components. These results suggested that individuals with a low social status are more sensitive to hedonic product information, because high-status information contained in the hedonic label induces a sense of threat in them and generates certain negative emotions.

摘要

消费者心理学研究表明,不同社会地位的个体对不同产品有着独特的购买意图。社会地位高的个体在衡量产品时,会同时考量产品的象征地位意义和实用价值,但他们不会对任何属性表现出强烈偏好。然而,社会地位低的个体对与象征地位意义相关且能满足其精神需求的享乐产品表现出强烈的购买倾向。这种现象可能是由享乐产品引发的自我威胁导致的。基于上述情况,本研究通过记录事件相关电位(ERP)来比较高社会地位组和低社会地位组在享乐型和实用型标签产品上的认知加工差异。结果显示,在P2、P3和LPP成分下,低社会地位组在享乐型标签刺激下引发的偏转小于实用型标签刺激。高社会地位组在这些成分上未表现出显著差异。这些结果表明,社会地位低的个体对享乐产品信息更为敏感,因为享乐型标签中包含的高地位信息会在他们心中引发威胁感并产生一定的负面情绪。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dedc/6530418/a12425af10d7/fnhum-13-00147-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dedc/6530418/837575b42a3b/fnhum-13-00147-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dedc/6530418/a12425af10d7/fnhum-13-00147-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dedc/6530418/837575b42a3b/fnhum-13-00147-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dedc/6530418/a12425af10d7/fnhum-13-00147-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
People of Lower Social Status Are More Sensitive to Hedonic Product Information-Electrophysiological Evidence From an ERP Study.社会地位较低的人对享乐主义产品信息更敏感——一项ERP研究的电生理证据
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 May 15;13:147. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00147. eCollection 2019.
2
How Social Ties Influence Consumer: Evidence from Event-Related Potentials.社会关系如何影响消费者:来自事件相关电位的证据。
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 12;12(1):e0169508. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169508. eCollection 2017.
3
Common neural value representations of hedonic and utilitarian products in the ventral stratum: An fMRI study.享乐产品和功利产品在腹侧纹状体中的常见神经价值表示:一项 fMRI 研究。
Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 30;9(1):15630. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-52159-9.
4
Symbolic Product Superiority in the Neural Salience of Compensatory Consumption Behavior.补偿性消费行为神经显著性中的符号性产品优势
Front Psychol. 2020 May 8;11:838. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00838. eCollection 2020.
5
Metabolic state as a modulator of neural event-related potentials for food stimuli in an implicit association test.代谢状态作为食物刺激神经事件相关电位的调节因子在内隐联想测验中的作用。
Physiol Behav. 2019 Oct 1;209:112589. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.112589. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
6
Utilitarian or hedonic: Event-related potential evidence of purchase intention bias during online shopping festivals.功利主义还是享乐主义:在线购物节期间购买意向偏差的事件相关电位证据。
Neurosci Lett. 2020 Jan 10;715:134665. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2019.134665. Epub 2019 Nov 30.
7
Promotion framing effects on the purchase of hedonic-utilitarian bundles: ERPs evidence of the moderating role of income source.促进享乐功利捆绑购买的框架效应:收入来源调节作用的 ERP 证据。
Neurosci Lett. 2023 Nov 20;817:137516. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2023.137516. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
8
Examining consumer luxury brand-related behavior intentions in a social media context: The moderating role of hedonic and utilitarian motivations.在社交媒体背景下考察消费者奢侈品品牌相关行为意向:享乐动机和实用动机的调节作用。
Physiol Behav. 2019 Mar 1;200:104-110. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.03.028. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
9
An Exploratory Study of Consumers' Perceptions of Product Types and Factors Affecting Purchase Intentions in the Subscription Economy: 99 Subscription Business Cases.订阅经济中消费者对产品类型的认知及影响购买意愿因素的探索性研究:99个订阅业务案例
Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Jun 6;12(6):179. doi: 10.3390/bs12060179.
10
Consumers Emotional Responses to Functional and Hedonic Products: A Neuroscience Research.消费者对功能性和享乐性产品的情感反应:一项神经科学研究。
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 6;11:559779. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.559779. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring consumers' perceptions of online purchase decision factors: electroencephalography and eye-tracking evidence.探索消费者对在线购买决策因素的认知:脑电图和眼动追踪证据
Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Nov 18;18:1411685. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1411685. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Higher Status Honesty Is Worth More: The Effect of Social Status on Honesty Evaluation.较高地位的诚实更有价值:社会地位对诚实评价的影响。
Front Psychol. 2018 Mar 20;9:350. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00350. eCollection 2018.
2
Emotional Picture Perception: Repetition Effects in Free-Viewing and during an Explicit Categorization Task.情绪图片感知:自由观看和明确分类任务中的重复效应
Front Psychol. 2017 Jul 4;8:1001. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01001. eCollection 2017.
3
Valence and arousal of emotional stimuli impact cognitive-motor performance in an oddball task.
情绪刺激的效价和唤醒水平会影响奇偶数任务中的认知运动表现。
Biol Psychol. 2017 Apr;125:105-114. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.02.010. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
4
Inhibitory control in euthymic bipolar disorder: Event related potentials during a Go/NoGo task.双相情感障碍缓解期的抑制控制:Go/NoGo任务中的事件相关电位
Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Apr;128(4):520-528. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2016.12.006. Epub 2016 Dec 18.
5
When Do Low Status Individuals Accept Less? The Interaction between Self- and Other-Status during Resource Distribution.地位较低的个体何时接受得更少?资源分配过程中自我地位与他人地位的相互作用。
Front Psychol. 2016 Oct 25;7:1667. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01667. eCollection 2016.
6
Looking Out From the Top: Differential Effects of Status and Power on Perspective Taking.从顶端俯瞰:地位与权力对换位思考的不同影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2016 Jun;42(6):723-37. doi: 10.1177/0146167216636628. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
7
How disgust facilitates avoidance: an ERP study on attention modulation by threats.厌恶如何促进回避:一项关于威胁对注意力调节的事件相关电位研究。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2015 Apr;10(4):598-604. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsu094. Epub 2014 Jun 28.
8
Social cognition in fishes.鱼类的社会认知。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2014 Sep;18(9):465-71. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.04.005. Epub 2014 May 9.
9
Temporal dynamics underlying the modulation of social status on social attention.社会地位调节社会注意力的时间动态。
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 25;9(3):e93139. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093139. eCollection 2014.
10
The psychology of change: self-affirmation and social psychological intervention.改变的心理学:自我肯定与社会心理干预。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2014;65:333-71. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115137.