Bettiga Debora, Bianchi Anna M, Lamberti Lucio, Noci Giuliano
Department of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 6;11:559779. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.559779. eCollection 2020.
Over the years, researchers have enriched the postulation that hedonic products generate deeper emotional reactions and feelings in the consumer than functional products. However, recent research empirically proves that hedonic products are more affect-rich only for some consumer segments or for specific consumption contexts. We argue that such inconsistency may derive from the nature of the emotions assessed that is strictly dependent on their empirical measurement and not from the mere existence of emotions themselves. Self-reported methods of evaluating consumer experience, on which prior studies are grounded, only assess conscious emotions the consumer can recognize and report, but not unconscious feelings, happening without individual awareness. The present work takes this challenge by conducting a laboratory experiment in which subjects are exposed to both a utilitarian product and a hedonic product. Physiological measures have been adopted to investigate unconscious emotional responses and self-reported measures to assess conscious emotions toward the products. Specifically, physiological data regarding the subjects' cardiac activity, respiratory activity, electrodermal activity, and cerebral activity have been collected and complemented with a survey. Results confirm that both functional and hedonic products generate emotional responses in consumers. Further, findings show that when a consumer is exposed to a functional product, the physiological emotional responses are disassociated from the self-reported ones. A diverse pattern is depicted for hedonic products. We suggest an alternative explanation for the apparent lack of affect-rich experiences elicited by functional products and the need to reconsider emotional responses for these products.
多年来,研究人员丰富了享乐型产品比功能型产品在消费者中产生更深刻情感反应和感受的假设。然而,最近的研究实证证明,享乐型产品仅在某些消费者细分群体或特定消费情境中情感更为丰富。我们认为,这种不一致可能源于所评估情感的性质,它严格依赖于其实证测量,而非情感本身的单纯存在。先前研究所基于的评估消费者体验的自我报告方法,仅评估消费者能够识别和报告的有意识情感,而不评估在个体无意识状态下发生的无意识感受。本研究通过开展一项实验室实验来应对这一挑战,在该实验中,让受试者接触一件实用型产品和一件享乐型产品。采用生理测量方法来调查无意识情感反应,并采用自我报告测量方法来评估对产品的有意识情感。具体而言,收集了有关受试者心脏活动、呼吸活动、皮肤电活动和大脑活动的生理数据,并辅以一项调查。结果证实,功能型产品和享乐型产品都会在消费者中产生情感反应。此外,研究结果表明,当消费者接触功能型产品时,生理情感反应与自我报告的反应是分离的。享乐型产品呈现出不同的模式。我们针对功能型产品明显缺乏情感丰富体验的情况提出了一种替代性解释,并指出有必要重新考虑这些产品的情感反应。