• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

补偿性消费行为神经显著性中的符号性产品优势

Symbolic Product Superiority in the Neural Salience of Compensatory Consumption Behavior.

作者信息

Yu Wenjun, Sun Zhongqiang, He Zhihui, Ye Chuyuan, Ma Qingguo

机构信息

Business School, Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.

Academy of Neuroeconomics and Neuromanagement, Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2020 May 8;11:838. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00838. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00838
PMID:32457682
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7225264/
Abstract

To cope with self-threat being induced by personal setbacks in daily life, compensatory consumption, especially on symbolic product, has been found to do valuable help to resolve discrepancies between ideal and actual self-concept. Conforming to symbolic self-completion theory, the current study adopted event-related potentials to explore the objective information processing stages in self-concept-impaired status (the defeat group) on a neural level. The behavioral results replicated previous findings that the defeat group gained stronger purchase intention for symbolic products than utilitarian products. The electrophysiological data demonstrated that perceptual difficulties for products in preliminary stage (N1) were steady among conditions, and after that, information processing separation emerged. In contrast to the individuals with a draw experience, those with a defeat experience raised highly focused attention (P2) and eager expectation (N2) for products, especially for symbolic ones. Meanwhile, symbolic (vs. utilitarian) products also evoked a higher emotional arousal level and slowed the diminishment of involved attentional resource (late positive potential) at late cognitive processing stage. Taken together, the sequential integration of multiple neural indicators contributes to elucidating the processing stages of compensatory consumption behavior.

摘要

为应对日常生活中个人挫折引发的自我威胁,研究发现补偿性消费,尤其是对具有象征意义产品的消费,有助于解决理想自我概念与实际自我概念之间的差异。根据象征自我完善理论,本研究采用事件相关电位,从神经层面探索自我概念受损状态(失败组)下客观信息加工阶段。行为结果重复了先前的研究发现,即失败组对具有象征意义产品的购买意愿比对实用产品更强。电生理数据表明,产品在初始阶段(N1)的感知困难在各条件下保持稳定,之后出现信息加工分离。与有平局经历的个体相比,有失败经历的个体对产品,尤其是具有象征意义的产品,表现出高度集中的注意力(P2)和急切的期待(N2)。同时,具有象征意义(与实用意义相对)的产品在认知加工后期也引发了更高的情绪唤醒水平,并减缓了所涉及注意力资源的减少(晚期正电位)。综上所述,多个神经指标的顺序整合有助于阐明补偿性消费行为的加工阶段。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/412d/7225264/871b624404af/fpsyg-11-00838-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/412d/7225264/4fd61cfffb18/fpsyg-11-00838-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/412d/7225264/871b624404af/fpsyg-11-00838-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/412d/7225264/4fd61cfffb18/fpsyg-11-00838-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/412d/7225264/871b624404af/fpsyg-11-00838-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Symbolic Product Superiority in the Neural Salience of Compensatory Consumption Behavior.补偿性消费行为神经显著性中的符号性产品优势
Front Psychol. 2020 May 8;11:838. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00838. eCollection 2020.
2
People of Lower Social Status Are More Sensitive to Hedonic Product Information-Electrophysiological Evidence From an ERP Study.社会地位较低的人对享乐主义产品信息更敏感——一项ERP研究的电生理证据
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 May 15;13:147. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00147. eCollection 2019.
3
Utilitarian or hedonic: Event-related potential evidence of purchase intention bias during online shopping festivals.功利主义还是享乐主义:在线购物节期间购买意向偏差的事件相关电位证据。
Neurosci Lett. 2020 Jan 10;715:134665. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2019.134665. Epub 2019 Nov 30.
4
Green Product Types Modulate Green Consumption in the Gain and Loss Framings: An Event-Related Potential Study.绿色产品类型在收益和损失框架下调节绿色消费:一项事件相关电位研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 29;19(17):10746. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710746.
5
Physical Self Matters: How the Dual Nature of Body Image Influences Smart Watch Purchase Intention.身体自我很重要:身体意象的双重性质如何影响智能手表购买意愿。
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 25;13:846491. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.846491. eCollection 2022.
6
The Effect of Reviewer Profile Photo on Purchase Decision: Evidence from Event-Related Potentials.审稿人个人资料照片对购买决策的影响:来自事件相关电位的证据。
Adv Cogn Psychol. 2021 Jan 13;17(1):49-57. doi: 10.5709/acp-0316-x. eCollection 2021.
7
How consumers are affected by product descriptions in online shopping: Event-related potentials evidence of the attribute framing effect.消费者在网上购物时如何受到产品描述的影响:基于事件相关电位的属性框架效应证据
Neurosci Res. 2017 Dec;125:21-28. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2017.07.006. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
8
Ratings or Sales? The Neural and Psychological Processes of Online Experience Product Purchase: Evidence from a Sample of Chinese University Students.评分还是销量?在线体验产品购买的神经和心理过程:来自中国大学生样本的证据。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Dec 7;12(12):499. doi: 10.3390/bs12120499.
9
Things Become Appealing When I Win: Neural Evidence of the Influence of Competition Outcomes on Brand Preference.当我获胜时事物变得有吸引力:竞争结果对品牌偏好影响的神经学证据。
Front Neurosci. 2018 Oct 26;12:779. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00779. eCollection 2018.
10
My friends have a word for it: Event-related potentials evidence of how social risk inhibits purchase intention.我的朋友们用一句话来形容它:与事件相关的电位证明了社会风险如何抑制购买意愿。
Neurosci Lett. 2017 Mar 16;643:70-75. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.02.023. Epub 2017 Feb 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Realizing consumers' existential dreams via product marketing and mixed reality: a perspective based on affective neuroscience theories.通过产品营销和混合现实实现消费者的存在主义梦想:基于情感神经科学理论的视角
Front Neurosci. 2023 Sep 5;17:1256194. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1256194. eCollection 2023.
2
Consumer Neuroscience: Attentional Preferences for Wine Labeling Reflected in the Posterior Contralateral Negativity.消费者神经科学:葡萄酒标签的注意力偏好反映在对侧后负波中。
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 14;12:688713. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.688713. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
How Do Price and Quantity Promotions Affect Hedonic Purchases? An ERPs Study.价格和数量促销如何影响享乐性购买?一项事件相关电位研究。
Front Neurosci. 2019 May 29;13:526. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00526. eCollection 2019.
2
Things Become Appealing When I Win: Neural Evidence of the Influence of Competition Outcomes on Brand Preference.当我获胜时事物变得有吸引力:竞争结果对品牌偏好影响的神经学证据。
Front Neurosci. 2018 Oct 26;12:779. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00779. eCollection 2018.
3
The Temptation of Zero Price: Event-Related Potentials Evidence of How Price Framing Influences the Purchase of Bundles.
零价格的诱惑:事件相关电位证明价格框架如何影响捆绑销售的购买行为。
Front Neurosci. 2018 Apr 20;12:251. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00251. eCollection 2018.
4
The Effects of Money on Fake Rating Behavior in E-Commerce: Electrophysiological Time Course Evidence From Consumers.金钱对电子商务中虚假评分行为的影响:来自消费者的电生理时间进程证据
Front Neurosci. 2018 Mar 19;12:156. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00156. eCollection 2018.
5
How consumers are affected by product descriptions in online shopping: Event-related potentials evidence of the attribute framing effect.消费者在网上购物时如何受到产品描述的影响:基于事件相关电位的属性框架效应证据
Neurosci Res. 2017 Dec;125:21-28. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2017.07.006. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
6
Influence of negative emotion on the framing effect: evidence from event-related potentials.负面情绪对框架效应的影响:来自事件相关电位的证据。
Neuroreport. 2015 Apr 15;26(6):325-32. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000346.
7
Motivational intensity modulates attentional scope: evidence from behavioral and ERP studies.动机强度调节注意范围:来自行为学和事件相关电位研究的证据。
Exp Brain Res. 2014 Oct;232(10):3291-300. doi: 10.1007/s00221-014-4014-x. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
8
Brain potentials associated with the outcome processing in framing effects.与框架效应中结果加工相关的脑电位。
Neurosci Lett. 2012 Oct 24;528(2):110-3. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.09.016. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
9
Performance monitoring following conflict: internal adjustments in cognitive control?冲突后绩效监测:认知控制的内部调整?
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Feb;50(3):426-33. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.12.021. Epub 2012 Jan 3.
10
Compatibility-sequence effects in the Simon task reflect episodic retrieval but not conflict adaptation: evidence from LRP and N2.Simon 任务中的兼容性-序列效应反映了情节提取,而不是冲突适应:来自 LRP 和 N2 的证据。
Biol Psychol. 2011 Sep;88(1):116-23. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.07.001. Epub 2011 Jul 19.