Salat D, Llop R, Aguilera C, Danés I, Bosch M, Asensio C, Castañeda F, Esterlich E, Vallano A
Clinical Pharmacology Service, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Fundació Institut Català de Farmacologia, Barcelona, Spain.
Department of Pharmacology, Therapeutics and Toxicology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2016 May;23(3):161-165. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2015-000770. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
Biotechnological agents (BA) are increasingly being used in clinical practice. We aimed to determine, whether enquiries about them to a therapeutic consultation service have also become more frequent, and to describe the information requested in these consultations.
We retrospectively reviewed 14 104 therapeutic consultations collected in a computerised database between 2000 and 2014. Enquiries about BA (monoclonal antibodies, fusion proteins or cytokine antagonists) were chosen. Information on the type of BA, underlying condition, type of enquiry and affiliation of the enquirer was retrieved and compared with data from consultations about other agents.
During the study period, 365 enquiries about 30 different BA were received. Only 4% of them were received before 2004, while 48.8% were received after 2010. Rituximab, infliximab, adalimumab and etanercept were most frequently enquired about. Agent selection (n=184) and/or adverse effects (n=174) were the most frequent reasons for making an enquiry. Most enquiries about an agent selection were made about an off-label use (n=164), mainly for systemic autoimmune diseases (n=61). Over half of the enquiries about adverse effects were about their teratogenic potential (n=96). Enquiries about BA more often requested an opinion (87.7% vs 77.7%) were made by physicians (89.9% vs 76.9%), from a hospital (81.6% vs 44.5%) and regarded a specific patient (87.4% vs 74.5%).
Therapeutic consultations about BA are increasing. Most of them are related to uncertainties of health professionals regarding any new medicine: their off-label use, actual adverse effects or the teratogenic potential of the involved agents.
生物技术药物(BA)在临床实践中的应用日益广泛。我们旨在确定向治疗咨询服务机构咨询此类药物的情况是否也变得更加频繁,并描述这些咨询中所请求的信息。
我们回顾性分析了2000年至2014年间在计算机数据库中收集的14104次治疗咨询。选取了关于BA(单克隆抗体、融合蛋白或细胞因子拮抗剂)的咨询。检索了关于BA的类型、基础疾病、咨询类型以及咨询者所属机构的信息,并与关于其他药物的咨询数据进行比较。
在研究期间,共收到365次关于30种不同BA的咨询。其中只有4%在2004年之前收到,而48.8%在2010年之后收到。利妥昔单抗、英夫利昔单抗、阿达木单抗和依那西普是咨询最多的药物。药物选择(n = 184)和/或不良反应(n = 174)是咨询的最常见原因。关于药物选择的大多数咨询是关于超说明书用药(n = 164),主要用于全身性自身免疫性疾病(n = 61)。超过一半的关于不良反应的咨询是关于其致畸潜力(n = 96)。关于BA的咨询更常请求提供意见(87.7%对77.7%),由医生提出(89.9%对76.9%),来自医院(81.6%对44.5%),并且涉及特定患者(87.4%对74.5%)。
关于BA的治疗咨询在增加。其中大多数与卫生专业人员对任何新药的不确定性有关:超说明书用药、实际不良反应或相关药物的致畸潜力。