Luciani Michela, Jack Suzan M, Campbell Karen, Orr Elisabeth, Durepos Pamela, Li Lin, Strachan Patricia, Di Mauro Stefania
RN MScN PhD, School of Nursing, Dept. of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano - Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
RN PhD, School of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Prof Inferm. 2019 Jan-Mar;72(1):60-68.
Within the context of evidence-informed decision making, health care professionals are critical consumers of research evidence. Clinician scientists, including nurse researchers, play a central role in producing this research evidence to inform and improve health practice, education, and policy. Health research is commonly conducted within one of three different paradigms: quantitative, qualitative or mixed methods. Each research approach is underpinned with unique philosophic assumptions, methods, and rhetoric. The evidence produced within each paradigm is necessary to provide health care decision-makers with information about the complex, and intrinsically diverse, human experiences of health and illness. Qualitative health research has been defined as a discipline, which has its roots in qualitative research and yet is unique in its focus, methods, and rules. The focus of qualitative health research is to describe, explore, and explain the health-illness continuum and issues specific to health services or policy contexts. Research designs unique to conducting qualitative health research include qualitative description, interpretive description, focused ethnography, and case study. Each qualitative health research design helps to logically and pragmatically determine the appropriate methods to use to: 1) define a purposeful sample; 2) identify appropriate strategies for data collection; 3) rigorously apply analytic techniques to the gathered data; and 4) present valid findings. In health, qualitative studies are often an integral component of program evaluations to identify and describe contextual factors related to individuals, teams, organizations or social structures that inhibit or facilitate the successful adoption, implementation and delivery of an intervention or program. Findings from qualitative studies can also inform the development of theoretically and contextually relevant assessment tools that can be used in practice.
在循证决策的背景下,医疗保健专业人员是研究证据的关键使用者。临床科学家,包括护士研究人员,在产生这些研究证据以指导和改善医疗实践、教育及政策方面发挥着核心作用。健康研究通常在三种不同范式之一内进行:定量研究、定性研究或混合方法研究。每种研究方法都有其独特的哲学假设、方法和措辞。每种范式产生的证据对于为医疗保健决策者提供有关健康与疾病这一复杂且本质上多样的人类体验的信息而言是必要的。定性健康研究已被定义为一门学科,它源于定性研究,但在其重点、方法和规则方面独具特色。定性健康研究的重点是描述、探索和解释健康 - 疾病连续体以及特定于健康服务或政策背景的问题。进行定性健康研究特有的研究设计包括定性描述、解释性描述、聚焦民族志和案例研究。每种定性健康研究设计有助于从逻辑和实际操作上确定用于以下方面的适当方法:1)定义有目的的样本;2)确定合适的数据收集策略;3)对收集到的数据严格应用分析技术;4)呈现有效的研究结果。在健康领域,定性研究通常是项目评估的一个组成部分,以识别和描述与个人、团队、组织或社会结构相关的背景因素,这些因素会抑制或促进干预措施或项目的成功采用、实施和交付。定性研究的结果还可为理论和背景相关的评估工具的开发提供信息,这些工具可用于实践。