• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Enablers and barriers to effective diabetes self-management: A multi-national investigation.有效糖尿病自我管理的促进因素和障碍:一项多国家调查。
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 5;14(6):e0217771. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217771. eCollection 2019.
2
Users' preferences and design recommendations to promote engagements with mobile apps for diabetes self-management: Multi-national perspectives.用户对促进糖尿病自我管理移动应用程序使用的偏好和设计建议:多国家视角。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 10;13(12):e0208942. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208942. eCollection 2018.
3
Dietary self-management practices among persons with T2DM: An exploratory qualitative study from western-coast of India.2 型糖尿病患者的饮食自我管理实践:来自印度西海岸的探索性定性研究。
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020 Nov-Dec;14(6):2161-2167. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.10.033. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
4
Psychological interventions to improve self-management of type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.心理干预对改善 1 型和 2 型糖尿病自我管理的效果:系统综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jun;24(28):1-232. doi: 10.3310/hta24280.
5
Improved self-management skills in Chinese diabetes patients through a comprehensive health literacy strategy: study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial.通过全面健康素养策略提高中国糖尿病患者的自我管理技能:一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2014 Dec 20;15:498. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-498.
6
Barriers to effective diabetes management - a survey of people with severe mental illness.有效糖尿病管理的障碍 - 严重精神疾病患者调查。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Jun 1;18(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1744-5.
7
Facilitators and Barriers to Chronic Disease Self-Management and Mobile Health Interventions for People Living With Diabetes and Hypertension in Cambodia: Qualitative Study.柬埔寨糖尿病和高血压患者慢性病自我管理及移动医疗干预的促进因素和障碍:定性研究
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Apr 24;8(4):e13536. doi: 10.2196/13536.
8
Behavioural interventions for type 2 diabetes: an evidence-based analysis.2型糖尿病的行为干预:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009;9(21):1-45. Epub 2009 Oct 1.
9
Mobile phone messaging for facilitating self-management of long-term illnesses.利用手机短信促进慢性病自我管理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12(12):CD007459. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007459.pub2.
10
A web-based intervention to support self-management of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: effect on self-efficacy, self-care and diabetes distress.一项支持2型糖尿病患者自我管理的基于网络的干预措施:对自我效能、自我护理和糖尿病困扰的影响。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014 Dec 14;14:117. doi: 10.1186/s12911-014-0117-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Self-Management Behaviours in Type 2 Diabetes Across Gulf Cooperation Council Countries: An Updated Narrative Review to Enhance Patient Care.海湾合作委员会国家2型糖尿病的自我管理行为:加强患者护理的最新叙述性综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Sep 8;13(17):2247. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13172247.
2
Leveraging Social Needs Assessments to Eliminate Barriers to Diabetes Self-Management in a Vulnerable Population.利用社会需求评估消除弱势群体糖尿病自我管理的障碍。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Aug 1;22(8):1213. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22081213.
3
Diabetes management: Self-management education and support program evaluations in Jeddah, KSA.糖尿病管理:沙特阿拉伯吉达市的自我管理教育与支持项目评估
J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2025 Aug 5;20(4):507-516. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2025.07.005. eCollection 2025 Aug.
4
Self-management needs of adolescents with type 1 diabetes on transition to adult health care: a qualitative study.1型糖尿病青少年向成人医疗保健过渡阶段的自我管理需求:一项定性研究。
Eur J Pediatr. 2025 Aug 9;184(9):541. doi: 10.1007/s00431-025-06373-5.
5
Mapping Barriers and Interventions to Diabetes Self-Management in Latino Youth: A Scoping Review.拉丁裔青少年糖尿病自我管理的障碍与干预措施映射:一项范围综述
Children (Basel). 2025 Jul 3;12(7):882. doi: 10.3390/children12070882.
6
Integrative technologies in nursing-led interventions for diabetes management: a systematic review of efficacy and outcomes.护理主导的糖尿病管理干预中的综合技术:疗效和结果的系统评价
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jul 4;24(1):846. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03435-9.
7
A health promotion model approach in exploring self-management and glycemic control in type 2 diabetes: the moderating effects of self-efficacy and social support.一种健康促进模型方法在探索2型糖尿病自我管理和血糖控制中的应用:自我效能感和社会支持的调节作用
Front Clin Diabetes Healthc. 2025 Jun 11;6:1573805. doi: 10.3389/fcdhc.2025.1573805. eCollection 2025.
8
Intangible cost and its associated factors among caregivers of individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus managed at primary healthcare settings: a scoping review.在初级卫生保健机构接受治疗的2型糖尿病患者的照顾者的无形成本及其相关因素:一项范围综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jun 9;25(1):822. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12944-x.
9
Self-care and self-management in diabetes: concepts, theories and practices.糖尿病的自我护理与自我管理:概念、理论与实践
Int J Clin Pharm. 2025 Jun 9. doi: 10.1007/s11096-025-01941-z.
10
Interventions to improve diabetes care and self-management for individuals experiencing homelessness: a scoping review with systematic search of qualitative and quantitative literature.改善无家可归者糖尿病护理和自我管理的干预措施:一项对定性和定量文献进行系统检索的范围综述
Diabetologia. 2025 Jun 3. doi: 10.1007/s00125-025-06449-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Users' preferences and design recommendations to promote engagements with mobile apps for diabetes self-management: Multi-national perspectives.用户对促进糖尿病自我管理移动应用程序使用的偏好和设计建议:多国家视角。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 10;13(12):e0208942. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208942. eCollection 2018.
2
Barriers to Diet and Exercise among Nepalese Type 2 Diabetic Patients.尼泊尔2型糖尿病患者饮食和运动的障碍
Int Sch Res Notices. 2017 Nov 14;2017:1273084. doi: 10.1155/2017/1273084. eCollection 2017.
3
Patients' Acceptance of Smartphone Health Technology for Chronic Disease Management: A Theoretical Model and Empirical Test.患者对用于慢性病管理的智能手机健康技术的接受度:一个理论模型与实证检验
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Dec 6;5(12):e177. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.7886.
4
Assessment of self-management in patients with diabetes using the novel LMC Skills, Confidence and Preparedness Index (SCPI).使用新型 LMC 技能、信心和准备指数 (SCPI) 评估糖尿病患者的自我管理能力。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018 Mar;137:128-136. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2017.10.028. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
5
What is the economic evidence for mHealth? A systematic review of economic evaluations of mHealth solutions.移动健康的经济证据是什么?对移动健康解决方案经济评估的系统综述。
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 2;12(2):e0170581. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170581. eCollection 2017.
6
The LMC Skills, Confidence & Preparedness Index (SCPI): development and evaluation of a novel tool for assessing self-management in patients with diabetes.LMC技能、信心与准备指数(SCPI):一种评估糖尿病患者自我管理的新型工具的开发与评估
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Jan 31;15(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0606-z.
7
Understanding Financial Barriers to Care in Patients With Diabetes.了解糖尿病患者就医的经济障碍。
Diabetes Educ. 2017 Feb;43(1):78-86. doi: 10.1177/0145721716679276. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
8
Impact of insulin pump on quality of life of diabetic patients.胰岛素泵对糖尿病患者生活质量的影响。
Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2016 Jul-Aug;20(4):506-11. doi: 10.4103/2230-8210.183472.
9
Using Digital Health Technology to Prevent and Treat Diabetes.利用数字健康技术预防和治疗糖尿病。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2016 Feb;18 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S56-68. doi: 10.1089/dia.2016.2506.
10
Factors associated with diet barriers in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes.2型糖尿病控制不佳患者饮食障碍的相关因素。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016 Jan 12;10:37-44. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S94275. eCollection 2016.

有效糖尿病自我管理的促进因素和障碍:一项多国家调查。

Enablers and barriers to effective diabetes self-management: A multi-national investigation.

机构信息

College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia.

College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Jun 5;14(6):e0217771. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217771. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0217771
PMID:31166971
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6550406/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to identify the common gaps in skills and self-efficacy for diabetes self-management and explore other factors which serve as enablers of, and barriers to, achieving optimal diabetes self-management. The information gathered could provide health professionals with valuable insights to achieving better health outcomes with self-management education and support for diabetes patients.

METHODS

International online survey and telephone interviews were conducted on adults who have type 1 or type 2 diabetes. The survey inquired about their skills and self-efficacy in diabetes self-management, while the interviews assessed other enablers of, and barriers to, diabetes self-management. Surveys were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Interviews were analysed using inductive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Survey participants (N = 217) had type 1 diabetes (38.2%) or type 2 diabetes (61.8%), with a mean age of 44.56 SD 11.51 and were from 4 continents (Europe, Australia, Asia, America). Identified gaps in diabetes self-management skills included the ability to: recognize and manage the impact of stress on diabetes, exercise planning to avoid hypoglycemia and interpreting blood glucose pattern levels. Self-efficacy for healthy coping with stress and adjusting medications or food intake to reach ideal blood glucose levels were minimal. Sixteen participants were interviewed. Common enablers of diabetes self-management included: (i) the will to prevent the development of diabetes complications and (ii) the use of technological devices. Issues regarding: (i) frustration due to dynamic and chronic nature of diabetes (ii) financial constraints (iii) unrealistic expectations and (iv) work and environment-related factors limited patients' effective self-management of diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

Educational reinforcement using technological devices such as mobile application has been highlighted as an enabler of diabetes self-management and it could be employed as an intervention to alleviate identified gaps in diabetes self-management. Furthermore, improved approaches that address financial burden, work and environment-related factors as well as diabetes distress are essential for enhancing diabetes self-management.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定糖尿病自我管理技能和自我效能方面的常见差距,并探讨促进和阻碍实现最佳糖尿病自我管理的其他因素。收集到的信息可以为医疗保健专业人员提供有价值的见解,以通过自我管理教育和支持来改善糖尿病患者的健康结果。

方法

对患有 1 型或 2 型糖尿病的成年人进行了国际在线调查和电话访谈。调查询问了他们在糖尿病自我管理方面的技能和自我效能,而访谈则评估了促进和阻碍糖尿病自我管理的其他因素。使用描述性和推断性统计方法分析调查结果。使用归纳主题分析方法分析访谈结果。

结果

调查参与者(N=217)患有 1 型糖尿病(38.2%)或 2 型糖尿病(61.8%),平均年龄为 44.56±11.51 岁,来自 4 个大洲(欧洲、澳大利亚、亚洲、美洲)。糖尿病自我管理技能方面存在的差距包括:识别和管理压力对糖尿病的影响、避免低血糖的运动计划以及解释血糖模式水平的能力。应对压力和调整药物或饮食以达到理想血糖水平的健康应对能力不足。对 16 名参与者进行了访谈。糖尿病自我管理的常见促进因素包括:(i)预防糖尿病并发症发展的意愿,以及(ii)使用技术设备。存在一些问题,例如:(i)由于糖尿病的动态和慢性性质而产生的沮丧,(ii)财务限制,(iii)不切实际的期望,以及(iv)工作和环境相关因素,限制了患者对糖尿病的有效自我管理。

结论

强调使用移动应用等技术设备进行教育强化是促进糖尿病自我管理的一种手段,可将其作为一种干预措施来减轻糖尿病自我管理方面的差距。此外,需要改进解决财务负担、工作和环境相关因素以及糖尿病困扰的方法,以增强糖尿病自我管理。