• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

烧伤特异性疼痛焦虑量表土耳其语版本的效度和信度

Validity and Reliability of Turkish Version of the Burn-Specific Pain Anxiety Scale.

作者信息

Deniz Doğan Sevgi, Arslan Sevban

机构信息

Health Services Department, Isparta Uygulamali Bilimler University, Uluborlu Selahattin Karasoy Vocational School, Isparta, Turkey.

Surgical Nursing Department, Cukurova University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Adana, Turkey.

出版信息

J Burn Care Res. 2019 Oct 16;40(6):818-822. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irz091.

DOI:10.1093/jbcr/irz091
PMID:31190060
Abstract

This study was conducted to adapt the Burn-Specific Pain Anxiety Scale (BSPAS) into Turkish, and to test its validity and reliability. The study was conducted between April 2016 and July 2017 in a university and a training/research hospital using the methodological research model. The population of the study consisted of patients hospitalized in burn units during the above-mentioned dates. The study was conducted with a total of 50 burn patients, who met the inclusion criteria, and who volunteered to participate in the study. Validity and reliability analyses were performed using language, content and construct validities, and a reliability analysis. The language validity of the BSPAS was tested using back translation method, and the content validity was tested using expert opinions. The results of exploratory factor analysis (0.727-0.910) demonstrated a single factor structure, and the factor loads were adequate. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the fit indexes were appropriate. To measure internal consistency of the scale, item total correlation was used, and the correlations were found to be adequate (0.59-0.96). The Cronbach's α coefficient of the scale was 0.95. It was determined that the Turkish version of the BSPAS is a valid and a reliable assessment tool.

摘要

本研究旨在将烧伤特异性疼痛焦虑量表(BSPAS)改编为土耳其语版本,并检验其有效性和可靠性。该研究于2016年4月至2017年7月期间,在一所大学及一家培训/研究医院采用方法学研究模型开展。研究对象为上述日期内在烧伤科住院的患者。本研究共纳入了50名符合纳入标准且自愿参与研究的烧伤患者。通过语言效度、内容效度和结构效度分析以及信度分析进行有效性和可靠性分析。BSPAS的语言效度采用回译法进行检验,内容效度采用专家意见进行检验。探索性因子分析结果(0.727 - 0.910)显示为单因子结构,且因子载荷充足。验证性因子分析表明拟合指数合适。为测量量表的内部一致性,采用了项目与总分的相关性分析,发现相关性充足(0.59 - 0.96)。该量表的克朗巴哈α系数为0.95。结果表明,BSPAS的土耳其语版本是一种有效且可靠的评估工具。

相似文献

1
Validity and Reliability of Turkish Version of the Burn-Specific Pain Anxiety Scale.烧伤特异性疼痛焦虑量表土耳其语版本的效度和信度
J Burn Care Res. 2019 Oct 16;40(6):818-822. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irz091.
2
Translation and psychometric evaluation of Persian versions of Burn Specific Pain Anxiety Scale and Impact of Event Scale.烧伤专用疼痛焦虑量表和事件影响量表波斯语版本的翻译及心理计量学评估。
Burns. 2013 Sep;39(6):1297-303. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2013.02.008. Epub 2013 Apr 13.
3
The West Haven Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory: Reliability and validity of the Turkish version in individuals with cancer.西黑文耶鲁多维疼痛量表:土耳其语版本在癌症患者中的信度和效度
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2016 Feb;20:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2015.03.007. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
4
Reliability and Validity of a Turkish version of the Prenatal Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale.土耳其语版产前母乳喂养自我效能量表的信效度
Midwifery. 2018 Sep;64:11-16. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.05.007. Epub 2018 May 18.
5
Turkish Adaptation of Diabetic Foot Ulcer Scale-Short Form.糖尿病足溃疡量表-简化版的土耳其语适应性研究。
Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2020 Sep;19(3):269-274. doi: 10.1177/1534734620921036. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
6
Validation of the Ludwigshafen German Version of the Burn Specific Health Scale-Brief.《路德维希港德语版烧伤特异性健康量表简表》的验证
J Burn Care Res. 2018 Feb 20;39(2):252-260. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000582.
7
The validity and reliability of the Diabetic Foot Scale-Short Form (DFS-SF) in the Turkish population: a methodological study.土耳其人群中糖尿病足量表-简化版(DFS-SF)的有效性和可靠性:一项方法学研究。
Turk J Med Sci. 2023 Aug 11;53(5):1438-1447. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.5711. eCollection 2023.
8
[Turkish validity and reliability study of fear of pain questionnaire-III].[疼痛恐惧问卷-III的土耳其语效度和信度研究]
Agri. 2018 Jan;30(1):18-27. doi: 10.5505/agri.2017.62681.
9
Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire.土耳其慢性疼痛接纳问卷的有效性和可靠性。
Balkan Med J. 2018 May 29;35(3):238-244. doi: 10.4274/balkanmedj.2016.1998.
10
Validation of the German version of the Burn Specific Health Scale-Brief (BSHS-B).《烧伤特异性健康量表简版(BSHS-B)》德文版的验证
Burns. 2015 Sep;41(6):1333-9. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2015.02.006. Epub 2015 Feb 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of the generative artificial intelligence awareness scale for secondary school students in Türkiye.土耳其中学生生成式人工智能意识量表的编制
Eur J Pediatr. 2025 Aug 30;184(9):585. doi: 10.1007/s00431-025-06435-8.