Division of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2020 Jun;26(3):728-737. doi: 10.1111/jep.13182. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) should provide busy health care professionals with easy-to-use tools that support efficient uptake of current best evidence in daily clinical practice. However, CPG uptake rarely occurs at the speed of evidence production. The aim of this study was to explore the factors influencing CPG uptake among South African (SA) physiotherapists (PTs).
An exploratory, descriptive qualitative study design was used, within an interpretative research paradigm. A phenomenological approach was taken, as the study aimed to explore the phenomenon of CPG uptake by SA PTs and how the themes and subthemes related to each other within this phenomenon. Semistructured interviews were undertaken via telephone calls that were audiotaped and independently transcribed. An inductive and deductive thematic content analysis approach was taken where the transcript content was analysed by hand.
Thirty-one PTs from the private, public, and education sectors participated in the interviews. The main themes identified were resources, training, and organizational factors. The SA PT workforce, particularly that in the public sector, is limited and patient load and need is high. Time to implement and stay up-to-date with current evidence were barriers for many interviewees. Participants also perceived CPG uptake as not being financially rewarding. Training in CPG uptake was mostly perceived as a facilitator, and the PTs felt that they would be more inclined to implement CPGs if they felt more confident in how to source and use CPGs, particularly if they were incentivized to undertake such training. Roles, responsibilities, and power in the health care team were perceived as being both organizational barriers and, conversely, facilitators, depending on work environments.
The findings of this study generally concur with previous studies about PT barriers to CPG uptake; however, it provides novel information on barrier contexts in one LMIC with complex PT service delivery.
临床实践指南(CPG)应为忙碌的医疗保健专业人员提供易于使用的工具,以支持在日常临床实践中高效采用当前最佳证据。然而,CPG 的采用速度很少与证据产生的速度相匹配。本研究旨在探讨南非(SA)物理治疗师(PT)采用 CPG 的影响因素。
本研究采用探索性、描述性定性研究设计,属于解释性研究范式。采用现象学方法,因为研究旨在探讨 SA PT 采用 CPG 的现象,以及该现象中主题和子主题如何相互关联。通过电话进行半结构化访谈,并对录音进行独立转录。采用归纳和演绎主题内容分析方法,对手头的转录内容进行分析。
31 名来自私人、公共和教育部门的 PT 参加了访谈。确定的主要主题是资源、培训和组织因素。SA PT 劳动力,尤其是公共部门的劳动力有限,而患者的数量和需求很高。许多受访者认为实施和跟上当前证据的时间是障碍。参与者还认为采用 CPG 没有经济回报。CPG 采用培训大多被视为促进因素,如果他们对如何获取和使用 CPG 更有信心,特别是如果他们有动力接受这种培训,PT 们会更倾向于实施 CPG。医疗保健团队中的角色、责任和权力被认为既是组织障碍,也是促进因素,这取决于工作环境。
本研究的结果与之前关于 PT 采用 CPG 障碍的研究大致一致;然而,它提供了一个 LMIC 中复杂的 PT 服务提供情况的障碍背景的新信息。