• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于消毒剂测试的青霉素瓶评估:细菌附着与表面质地

Evaluation of penicylinders used in disinfectant testing: bacterial attachment and surface texture.

作者信息

Cole E C, Rutala W A, Carson J L

机构信息

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Division of Infectious Diseases 27514.

出版信息

J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1987 Sep-Oct;70(5):903-6.

PMID:3119561
Abstract

Two possible deficiencies in the AOAC use-dilution method for registration of chemical disinfectants by the Environmental Protection Agency are examined: (1) the physical disparities among brands of penicylinders and (2) the variability of bacterial numbers on penicylinders depending upon test strain and penicylinder surface texture. Textural differences of 2 brands of stainless steel penicylinders, one brand of porcelain, and one brand of glass were assessed by scanning electron microscopy. A considerable variation in smoothness of both inner and outer surfaces of stainless steel and porcelain penicylinders was observed. Glass penicylinders were very smooth. Numbers of bacteria attached to a penicylinder were assessed by vortexing the penicylinders 30 s at No. 4 after using the AOAC method of bacterial inoculation and drying 40 min at 37 degrees C. With this methodology, stainless steel carriers retained the 3 AOAC-recommended bacterial test strains differentially: ca 10(7) for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 5 X 10(6) for Staphylococcus aureus, and 10(6) for Salmonella choleraesuis; glass retained 10(6)-10(7) organisms of all 3 test strains; porcelain retained about that amount of S. aureus but 10(5)-10(6) P. aeruginosa and 10(3)-10(4) S. choleraesuis. These data suggest that disinfectants are not similarly challenged with the AOAC-recommended test bacteria and that an alternative method should be considered to ensure comparable numbers of bacteria on penicylinders.

摘要

对美国官方分析化学师协会(AOAC)用于美国环境保护局化学消毒剂注册的使用稀释法的两个可能缺陷进行了研究:(1)笔式圆筒各品牌之间的物理差异,以及(2)笔式圆筒上细菌数量的变异性,这取决于测试菌株和笔式圆筒表面质地。通过扫描电子显微镜评估了2个品牌不锈钢笔式圆筒、1个品牌瓷器笔式圆筒和1个品牌玻璃笔式圆筒的质地差异。观察到不锈钢和瓷器笔式圆筒的内表面和外表面在光滑度上有相当大的差异。玻璃笔式圆筒非常光滑。在使用AOAC细菌接种方法并在37℃干燥40分钟后,通过在4号条件下将笔式圆筒涡旋30秒来评估附着在笔式圆筒上的细菌数量。采用这种方法,不锈钢载体对AOAC推荐的3种细菌测试菌株的保留情况不同:铜绿假单胞菌约为10⁷,金黄色葡萄球菌为5×10⁶,猪霍乱沙门氏菌为10⁶;玻璃对所有3种测试菌株保留10⁶ - 10⁷个生物体;瓷器保留的金黄色葡萄球菌数量约为上述数量,但铜绿假单胞菌为10⁵ - 10⁶,猪霍乱沙门氏菌为10³ - 10⁴。这些数据表明,消毒剂对AOAC推荐的测试细菌的挑战并不相同,应该考虑采用替代方法来确保笔式圆筒上的细菌数量可比。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of penicylinders used in disinfectant testing: bacterial attachment and surface texture.用于消毒剂测试的青霉素瓶评估:细菌附着与表面质地
J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1987 Sep-Oct;70(5):903-6.
2
Bacterial numbers on penicylinders used in disinfectant testing: use of 24 hour adjusted broth cultures.用于消毒剂测试的青霉素瓶上的细菌数量:使用24小时调整后的肉汤培养物。
J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1988 Jan-Feb;71(1):9-11.
3
Quantitative evaluation of bacteria washed from stainless steel penicylinders during AOAC use-dilution method.在AOAC使用稀释法过程中,对从不锈钢青霉素瓶上洗下的细菌进行定量评估。
J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1988 Sep-Oct;71(5):868-71.
4
Standardization of bacterial numbers of penicylinders used in disinfectant testing: interlaboratory study.用于消毒剂测试的青霉素瓶细菌数量标准化:实验室间研究
J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1987 Jul-Aug;70(4):635-7.
5
Comparison of stainless steel penicylinders used in disinfectant testing.用于消毒剂测试的不锈钢青霉素瓶的比较。
J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1988 Mar-Apr;71(2):288-9.
6
Disinfectant testing using a modified use-dilution method: collaborative study.采用改良使用稀释法进行消毒剂测试:协作研究
J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1988 Nov-Dec;71(6):1187-94.
7
Evaluation of microbial loads of Bacillus subtilis spores on penicylinders.青霉素瓶上枯草芽孢杆菌孢子微生物负荷的评估。
J AOAC Int. 1993 Mar-Apr;76(2):355-60.
8
Ineffectiveness of hospital disinfectants against bacteria: a collaborative study.医院消毒剂对细菌的无效性:一项合作研究。
Infect Control. 1987 Dec;8(12):501-6. doi: 10.1017/s0195941700067564.
9
[Efficacy of 8 disinfectants on 3 types of surfaces contaminated by Pseudomonas aeruginosa].[8种消毒剂对3种被铜绿假单胞菌污染表面的消毒效果]
Can J Microbiol. 1983 Dec;29(12):1715-30.
10
The assessment of the bactericidal activity of surface disinfectants. IV. The AOAC use-dilution method and the Kelsey-Sykes test.表面消毒剂杀菌活性的评估。IV. AOAC使用稀释法和凯尔西-赛克斯试验。
Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed. 1992 Feb;192(5):432-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative mycobactericidal efficacy of chemical disinfectants in suspension and carrier tests.化学消毒剂在悬液和载体试验中的杀分枝杆菌效果比较
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988 Nov;54(11):2856-8. doi: 10.1128/aem.54.11.2856-2858.1988.
2
Pseudomonas pellicle in disinfectant testing: electron microscopy, pellicle removal, and effect on test results.消毒剂测试中的铜绿假单胞菌菌膜:电子显微镜观察、菌膜去除及对测试结果的影响
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989 Feb;55(2):511-3. doi: 10.1128/aem.55.2.511-513.1989.
3
Effect of methodology, dilution, and exposure time on the tuberculocidal activity of glutaraldehyde-based disinfectants.
方法、稀释度和暴露时间对戊二醛基消毒剂杀结核活性的影响。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990 Jun;56(6):1813-7. doi: 10.1128/aem.56.6.1813-1817.1990.