Suppr超能文献

方法、稀释度和暴露时间对戊二醛基消毒剂杀结核活性的影响。

Effect of methodology, dilution, and exposure time on the tuberculocidal activity of glutaraldehyde-based disinfectants.

作者信息

Cole E C, Rutala W A, Nessen L, Wannamaker N S, Weber D J

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27599-7030.

出版信息

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990 Jun;56(6):1813-7. doi: 10.1128/aem.56.6.1813-1817.1990.

Abstract

The Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) test for assessing the tuberculocidal activity of disinfectants has been shown to be variable. A modified AOAC test, which substituted Middlebrook 7H9 broth as the primary subculture medium and used neutralization by dilution, was compared with the standard AOAC method to assess the mycobactericidal activity of three glutaraldehyde-based disinfectants at 20 degrees C and various exposure times. These changes had a marked effect on results, with the modified AOAC test providing more positive penicylinders per 10 replicates in 12 of the 13 comparisons that provided positive results. These differences were observed with both Mycobacterium bovis (ATCC 35743) and a clinical isolate of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. The effects of various exposure times to and dilutions of the glutaraldehyde-based disinfectants were also examined. The minimum exposure time needed to inactivate reliably M. bovis or M. tuberculosis with 2% glutaraldehyde was 20 min at 20 degrees C. Diluting 2% glutaraldehyde caused a significant decline in mycobactericidal activity. Modification of the standard AOAC test to improve its sensitivity in detecting the failure of disinfectants to inactivate mycobacteria is indicated.

摘要

官方分析化学家协会(AOAC)用于评估消毒剂杀结核活性的试验已被证明存在变数。一种改良的AOAC试验,用Middlebrook 7H9肉汤替代原代传代培养基,并采用稀释中和法,与标准AOAC方法进行比较,以评估三种戊二醛基消毒剂在20℃及不同暴露时间下的杀分枝杆菌活性。这些改变对结果有显著影响,在13次得出阳性结果的比较中,有12次改良的AOAC试验每10次重复检测得到更多阳性培养管。在用牛分枝杆菌(ATCC 35743)和结核分枝杆菌临床分离株进行试验时均观察到了这些差异。还研究了戊二醛基消毒剂不同暴露时间和稀释度的影响。在20℃下,用2%戊二醛可靠灭活牛分枝杆菌或结核分枝杆菌所需的最短暴露时间为20分钟。稀释2%戊二醛会导致杀分枝杆菌活性显著下降。表明需要对标准AOAC试验进行改进,以提高其检测消毒剂未能灭活分枝杆菌的敏感性。

相似文献

1
Effect of methodology, dilution, and exposure time on the tuberculocidal activity of glutaraldehyde-based disinfectants.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990 Jun;56(6):1813-7. doi: 10.1128/aem.56.6.1813-1817.1990.
2
Inactivation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium bovis by 14 hospital disinfectants.
Am J Med. 1991 Sep 16;91(3B):267S-271S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(91)90380-g.
3
Mycobactericidal activity of glutaraldehyde solutions.
J Clin Microbiol. 1976 Nov;4(5):408-12. doi: 10.1128/jcm.4.5.408-412.1976.
4
Effect of methodology on the tuberculocidal activity of a glutaraldehyde-based disinfectant.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999 Sep;65(9):4239-40. doi: 10.1128/AEM.65.9.4239-4240.1999.
5
Kinetics of the tuberculocidal response by alkaline glutaraldehyde in solution and on an inert surface.
J Appl Bacteriol. 1986 Jul;61(1):87-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1986.tb03762.x.
6
Inactivation of Clostridium difficile spores by disinfectants.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1993 Jan;14(1):36-9. doi: 10.1086/646628.
7
A rapid method for determining the tuberculocidal activity of liquid chemical germicides.
Curr Microbiol. 2001 Aug;43(2):79-82. doi: 10.1007/s002840010264.
9
Use of membrane filters for measurement of mycobactericidal activity of alkaline glutaraldehyde solution.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987 Apr;53(4):737-9. doi: 10.1128/aem.53.4.737-739.1987.
10
Mycobactericidal activity of selected disinfectants using a quantitative suspension test.
J Hosp Infect. 1999 Feb;41(2):111-21. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6701(99)90048-8.

引用本文的文献

1
The Biosafety Research Road Map: The Search for Evidence to Support Practices in the Laboratory-Zoonotic Avian Influenza and .
Appl Biosaf. 2023 Sep 1;28(3):135-151. doi: 10.1089/apb.2022.0038. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
2
Culture variability associated with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Tuberculocidal Activity Test Method.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996 Aug;62(8):2681-6. doi: 10.1128/aem.62.8.2681-2686.1996.
3
Bactericidal, virucidal, and mycobactericidal activities of reused alkaline glutaraldehyde in an endoscopy unit.
J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Nov;31(11):2988-95. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.11.2988-2995.1993.
4
Efficacies of selected disinfectants against Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Oct;28(10):2234-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.10.2234-2239.1990.

本文引用的文献

1
A new synergized glutaraldehyde-phenate sterilizing solution and concentrated disinfectant.
Infect Control. 1981 Jan-Feb;2(1):26-30. doi: 10.1017/s0195941700053704.
2
Drug-resistant Salmonella from animals fed antimicrobials.
N Engl J Med. 1984 Sep 6;311(10):617-22. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198409063111001.
3
Evaluation of carriers used in the test methods of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1986 Jan;51(1):91-4. doi: 10.1128/aem.51.1.91-94.1986.
4
A more accurate method for measurement of tuberculocidal activity of disinfectants.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987 Sep;53(9):2189-92. doi: 10.1128/aem.53.9.2189-2192.1987.
8
Comparative mycobactericidal efficacy of chemical disinfectants in suspension and carrier tests.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988 Nov;54(11):2856-8. doi: 10.1128/aem.54.11.2856-2858.1988.
9

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验