Department of Anesthesia, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Eval Health Prof. 2020 Dec;43(4):207-212. doi: 10.1177/0163278719856406. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) offers standardized assessment measures of clinically relevant patient-reported outcomes. This study evaluated the reliability and validity of select PROMIS measures with U.S. military veterans following orthopedic surgery. Data for the current study were collected as part of a pilot randomized control trial assessing the efficacy of a 1-day Acceptance and Commitment Therapy workshop on persistent postsurgical pain in at-risk veterans undergoing orthopedic surgery. Sixty-seven participants completed surveys 3 months after surgery. Participants completed the following PROMIS instruments: PROMIS Anxiety Short Form 8a, PROMIS Depression Short Form 8b, and PROMIS Pain Interference Short Form 8a. PROMIS measures were compared to the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item Scale, the Patient Health Questionnaire 9-Item Scale, and the Brief Pain Inventory Pain Interference subscale, respectively. All three PROMIS measures demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's αs ranged from .93 to .96) and each loaded onto a single factor. The PROMIS measures were moderately correlated with their respective comparison measures ( = .69 to .76). The PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression measures were highly correlated to one another ( = .91). Findings highlight the potential utility of these PROMIS measures in veterans following orthopedic surgery and the overlap between the PROMIS depression and anxiety measures in this sample.
患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)提供了临床相关患者报告结局的标准化评估措施。本研究评估了 PROMIS 测量方法在接受骨科手术后的美国退伍军人中的可靠性和有效性。本研究的数据是作为一项试点随机对照试验的一部分收集的,该试验评估了为期一天的接受与承诺疗法工作坊对接受骨科手术的高危退伍军人持续性术后疼痛的疗效。67 名参与者在手术后 3 个月完成了调查。参与者完成了以下 PROMIS 工具:PROMIS 焦虑量表 8a 短式,PROMIS 抑郁量表 8b 短式和 PROMIS 疼痛干扰量表 8a 短式。PROMIS 测量方法分别与广泛性焦虑障碍 7 项量表、患者健康问卷 9 项量表和简明疼痛干扰量表进行了比较。所有三种 PROMIS 测量方法均表现出极好的内部一致性(克伦巴赫的 α 值范围从.93 到.96),并且每种方法都加载到一个单一的因素上。PROMIS 测量方法与各自的比较方法中度相关( =.69 到.76)。PROMIS 焦虑和 PROMIS 抑郁测量方法彼此高度相关( =.91)。研究结果强调了这些 PROMIS 测量方法在接受骨科手术后的退伍军人中的潜在应用价值,以及在该样本中 PROMIS 抑郁和焦虑测量方法之间的重叠。