Ogbuabor Daniel Chukwuemeka, Onwujekwe Obinna Emmanuel
Department of Health Systems and Policy, Sustainable Impact Resource Agency, University of Nigeria Enugu Campus (UNEC), 22 Ogidi Street, Asata, Enugu, P.O. Box 15534, Enugu State, Nigeria.
Department of Health Administration and Management, University of Nigeria Enugu Campus, Enugu, Enugu State, Nigeria.
Health Econ Rev. 2019 Jun 13;9(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13561-019-0235-9.
Relatively little is known about how public financial management (PFM) systems and health financing policies align in low- and middle-income countries. This study assessed the alignment of PFM systems with health financing functions in the free maternal and child healthcare programme (FMCHP) of Enugu State, Nigeria.
Data were collected through quantitative and qualitative document review, and semi-structured, in-depth interview with 16 purposively selected policymakers involved in FMCHP. Data collection and analysis were by guided a framework for assessing alignment of PFM systems and health financing policies. Revenue and expenditure trend analyses were done using descriptive statistics and analysis of variance (ANOVA). Level of significance was set at ρ < 0.05. Qualitative data were analysed using a framework approach.
The results showed that no more than 50% of FMCHP fund were collected despite that the promised fund remained unchanged since inception. Revenue generation significantly varied between 2010 and 2016 (ρ < 0.05). Level of pooling was limited by non-compliance with contribution rules, recurrent unauthorised expenditure and absence of expenditure caps. The unauthorised expenditure significantly varied between 2010 and 2016 (ρ < 0.05). Misalignment of budget monitoring and purchasing revealed absence of auditing and delays in provider payment. Refunds to providers significantly varied between 2010 and 2016 (ρ < 0.05) due to weak Steering Committee, weak vetting team, paper-based claims management and institutional conflicts between Ministry of Health and district-level officials.
This study identified important lessons to align PFM systems and FMCHP. A realistic and evidence-informed budget and enforcement of contribution rules are critical to adequate and sustainable revenue generation. Clarity of roles for various FMCHP committees and use of clear resource allocation strategy would strengthen pooling and fund management. Enforcement of provider payment standards, regular auditing, and a stronger role for the parliament in budgetary processes are warranted.
在低收入和中等收入国家,关于公共财务管理(PFM)系统与卫生筹资政策如何协调一致,人们了解得相对较少。本研究评估了尼日利亚埃努古州免费母婴保健项目(FMCHP)中PFM系统与卫生筹资职能的协调性。
通过定量和定性文件审查,以及对16名有目的地挑选出的参与FMCHP的政策制定者进行半结构化深度访谈来收集数据。数据收集和分析遵循一个评估PFM系统与卫生筹资政策协调性的框架。使用描述性统计和方差分析(ANOVA)进行收入和支出趋势分析。显著性水平设定为ρ < 0.05。定性数据采用框架法进行分析。
结果显示,尽管自项目启动以来承诺的资金保持不变,但FMCHP资金的收取不超过50%。2010年至2016年期间,创收情况有显著差异(ρ < 0.05)。资金统筹水平受到未遵守缴费规定、经常性未经授权支出以及缺乏支出上限的限制。2010年至2016年期间,未经授权支出有显著差异(ρ < 0.05)。预算监测与采购的不协调表明缺乏审计以及向提供者付款存在延迟。由于指导委员会软弱、审查团队薄弱、基于纸质的报销管理以及卫生部与地区级官员之间的机构冲突,2010年至2016年期间向提供者的退款有显著差异(ρ < 0.05)。
本研究确定了使PFM系统与FMCHP协调一致的重要经验教训。制定切合实际且基于证据的预算以及执行缴费规定对于充足和可持续的创收至关重要。明确FMCHP各委员会的职责并采用明确的资源分配策略将加强资金统筹和管理。有必要执行提供者付款标准、定期审计,并让议会在预算过程中发挥更强作用。