Suppr超能文献

激光治疗表皮痣:一项多中心回顾性研究及长期随访。

Laser treatment of epidermal nevi: A multicenter retrospective study with long-term follow-up.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, CHU Nice, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice; Department of Dermatology, Qassim University, CHU Nice, Unaizah College of Medicine, Qassim.

Department of Dermatology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam.

出版信息

J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 Dec;83(6):1606-1615. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.06.013. Epub 2019 Jun 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with epidermal nevi strongly demand cosmetic improvement. Laser treatment appears appealing and is frequently used in clinical practice. Nevertheless, large series with long-term follow-up are missing, preventing definitive conclusions about its real benefit.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the long-term effectiveness and safety of lasers for epidermal nevi.

METHODS

Bicentric, retrospective, cohort study, including all patients treated with a laser for an epidermal nevus with more than a 1-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Seventy patients were treated for different types of epidermal nevi, mostly with ablative lasers: 23 verrucous epidermal nevi, 16 nevi sebaceous, 26 Becker nevi, 2 inflammatory linear verrucous epidermal nevi, 1 smooth-muscle hamartoma, 1 rounded and velvety epidermal nevus, and 1 nevus lipomatosus superficialis. The follow-up period was a median of 37 months (range, 12-127 months). Better results, fewer recurrences, and higher patient satisfaction were noted in treatments for verrucous epidermal nevi than for nevi sebaceous. Q-switched lasers failed to show any degree of improvement in almost all patients with Becker nevus.

LIMITATIONS

The retrospective nature of the study.

CONCLUSIONS

Ablative lasers can treat verrucous epidermal nevi with good long-term esthetic results but have limited long-term efficacy for nevus sebaceous. Q-switched lasers failed to improve Becker nevi.

摘要

背景

表皮痣患者强烈要求改善美容。激光治疗似乎很有吸引力,并且在临床实践中经常使用。然而,缺乏长期随访的大系列研究,无法对其真正的益处得出明确结论。

目的

评估激光治疗表皮痣的长期效果和安全性。

方法

这是一项回顾性、双中心队列研究,纳入了所有接受激光治疗且随访时间超过 1 年的表皮痣患者。

结果

70 例不同类型的表皮痣患者接受了治疗,主要采用的是消融性激光:23 例疣状表皮痣、16 例皮脂腺痣、26 例贝克痣、2 例炎症性线状疣状表皮痣、1 例平滑肌错构瘤、1 例圆形柔软的表皮痣和 1 例浅表脂肪瘤样痣。随访时间中位数为 37 个月(范围:12-127 个月)。疣状表皮痣的治疗效果更好、复发率更低,患者满意度更高,而皮脂腺痣的治疗效果则较差。Q-开关激光治疗贝克痣几乎没有任何程度的改善。

局限性

研究的回顾性性质。

结论

消融性激光可以治疗疣状表皮痣,获得良好的长期美容效果,但对皮脂腺痣的长期疗效有限。Q-开关激光不能改善贝克痣。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验