• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) data linkage service user and carer advisory group: creating and sustaining a successful patient and public involvement group to guide research in a complex area.莫兹利生物医学研究中心(BRC)数据链接服务用户及护理人员咨询小组:创建并维持一个成功的患者及公众参与小组,以指导复杂领域的研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2019 Jun 11;5:20. doi: 10.1186/s40900-019-0152-4. eCollection 2019.
2
Involving carer advisors in evidence synthesis to improve carers' mental health during end-of-life home care: co-production during COVID-19 remote working.让护理顾问参与证据综合工作以改善临终居家护理期间护理人员的心理健康:新冠疫情远程工作期间的共同制作。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Oct;13(8):1-48. doi: 10.3310/TGHH6428.
3
4
Between funder requirements and 'jobbing scientists': the evolution of patient and public involvement in a mental health biomedical research centre - a qualitative study.在资助者要求与“临时科学家”之间:心理健康生物医学研究中心患者及公众参与的演变——一项定性研究
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 Apr 17;6:12. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00185-7. eCollection 2020.
5
Service user and carer involvement in mental health care safety: raising concerns and improving the safety of services.服务使用者和护理者参与精神卫生保健安全:提出关切并改善服务安全性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug 17;18(1):644. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3455-5.
6
EQUIP training the trainers: an evaluation of a training programme for service users and carers involved in training mental health professionals in user-involved care planning.EQUIP培训培训者:对一项针对参与精神卫生专业人员用户参与式护理计划培训的服务使用者和护理者的培训项目的评估。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2017 Aug;24(6):367-376. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12361. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
7
Understanding what affects psychological morbidity in informal carers when providing care at home for patients at the end of life: a systematic qualitative evidence synthesis.了解在家中为临终患者提供护理时,哪些因素会影响非正式护理人员的心理发病率:一项系统的定性证据综合分析。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Sep;13(8):1-53. doi: 10.3310/PYTR4127.
8
A potential model for the first all Wales mental health service user and carer-led research group.一个潜在的全威尔士心理健康服务使用者和照顾者主导的研究小组的模型。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2010 Feb;17(1):31-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2009.01473.x.
9
Involving service users in the Birth Timing project, a data linkage study analysing the timing of births and their outcomes.让服务使用者参与“分娩时间”项目,这是一项分析分娩时间及其结果的数据关联研究。
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2020 Nov 2;5(3):1366. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v5i3.1366.
10
Patient Engagement in Research Scale (PEIRS-22): Danish translation, applicability, and user experiences.患者参与研究量表(PEIRS - 22):丹麦语翻译、适用性及用户体验
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Dec 7;9(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00526-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Emerging practice in mental health patient and public involvement research advisory groups: a narrative review.心理健康患者及公众参与研究咨询小组的新实践:一项叙述性综述。
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 23;25(1):722. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-07120-8.
2
Prediction of individualised 6-month mortality risk in opioid use disorder.阿片类药物使用障碍患者个体化6个月死亡风险的预测
Br J Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 7:1-8. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2025.10313.
3
Transparency in the existence, use, and output of a mental health data resource: a descriptive paper from the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) Clinical Record Interactive Search (CRIS) Platform.心理健康数据资源的存在、使用及产出的透明度:来自英国国家卫生与保健研究机构(NIHR)莫兹利生物医学研究中心(BRC)临床记录交互式检索(CRIS)平台的描述性论文
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2025 Apr 10;10(1):2945. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v10i2.2945. eCollection 2025.
4
Using data linkage for mental health research in Australia.利用数据链接开展澳大利亚的心理健康研究。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2025 Jul;59(7):588-601. doi: 10.1177/00048674251333574. Epub 2025 May 13.
5
Factors that affect clinical youth engagement in digital mental health research: a qualitative sub-study nested within a prospective cohort study.影响青少年参与数字心理健康研究的临床因素:一项嵌套在前瞻性队列研究中的定性子研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Apr 30;25(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02571-9.
6
Recovery in personality disorders: the development and preliminary testing of a novel natural language processing model to identify recovery in mental health electronic records.人格障碍的康复:一种用于在心理健康电子记录中识别康复情况的新型自然语言处理模型的开发与初步测试
Front Digit Health. 2025 Apr 3;7:1544781. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1544781. eCollection 2025.
7
Cohort profile: working age adults accessing secondary mental health services in South London (UK) and benefits - a data linkage of electronic mental health records and benefits data.队列简介:英国伦敦南部使用二级心理健康服务的工作年龄成年人及其福利——电子心理健康记录与福利数据的关联
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2024 May 23;9(1):2377. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v9i1.2377. eCollection 2024.
8
Public Involvement and Engagement in Big Data Research: Scoping Review.公众参与大数据研究:范围综述
J Particip Med. 2024 Aug 16;16:e56673. doi: 10.2196/56673.
9
Evaluation of Public Involvement in Doctoral Research Using a Four-Dimensional Theoretical Framework.使用四维理论框架评估公众参与博士研究的情况。
Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14149. doi: 10.1111/hex.14149.
10
The development and internal validation of a multivariable model predicting 6-month mortality for people with opioid use disorder presenting to community drug services in England: a protocol.预测英格兰社区戒毒服务中阿片类药物使用障碍患者6个月死亡率的多变量模型的开发与内部验证:一项方案
Diagn Progn Res. 2024 Apr 16;8(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s41512-024-00170-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Sharpening the focus: differentiating between focus groups for patient engagement vs. qualitative research.明确重点:区分用于患者参与的焦点小组与定性研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2018 Jun 25;4:19. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0102-6. eCollection 2018.
2
Patient engagement in Canada: a scoping review of the 'how' and 'what' of patient engagement in health research.加拿大的患者参与:对健康研究中患者参与的“方式”和“内容”的范围综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Feb 7;16(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0282-4.
3
GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research.GRIPP2报告清单:改善患者和公众参与研究报告的工具。
BMJ. 2017 Aug 2;358:j3453. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j3453.
4
Is the linkage of census and health data justified? Views from a public panel of the Scottish Health and Ethnicity Linkage study.人口普查和健康数据的关联是否合理?来自苏格兰健康和种族关联研究公众小组的观点。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2018 Jun 1;40(2):435-440. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdx060.
5
Linking health and education data to plan and evaluate services for children.将健康与教育数据相联系,以规划和评估儿童服务。
Arch Dis Child. 2017 Jul;102(7):599-602. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2016-311656. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
6
Public responses to the sharing and linkage of health data for research purposes: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.公众对用于研究目的的健康数据共享和关联的反应:定性研究的系统评价与主题综合
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Nov 10;17(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0153-x.
7
Cervical and breast cancer screening uptake among women with serious mental illness: a data linkage study.重度精神疾病女性的宫颈癌和乳腺癌筛查情况:一项数据关联研究。
BMC Cancer. 2016 Oct 21;16(1):819. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2842-8.
8
Cohort profile of the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust Biomedical Research Centre (SLaM BRC) Case Register: current status and recent enhancement of an Electronic Mental Health Record-derived data resource.南伦敦和莫兹利国民保健服务基金会信托生物医学研究中心(SLaM BRC)病例登记册的队列概况:源自电子心理健康记录的数据资源的现状及近期改进
BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 1;6(3):e008721. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008721.
9
A systematic review of the impact of patient and public involvement on service users, researchers and communities.患者和公众参与对服务使用者、研究人员和社区影响的系统评价。
Patient. 2014;7(4):387-95. doi: 10.1007/s40271-014-0065-0.
10
Exploring perceived barriers, drivers, impacts and the need for evaluation of public involvement in health and social care research: a modified Delphi study.探索公众参与健康和社会护理研究中所感知到的障碍、驱动因素、影响及评估需求:一项改良德尔菲研究
BMJ Open. 2014 Jun 17;4(6):e004943. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004943.

莫兹利生物医学研究中心(BRC)数据链接服务用户及护理人员咨询小组:创建并维持一个成功的患者及公众参与小组,以指导复杂领域的研究。

The Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) data linkage service user and carer advisory group: creating and sustaining a successful patient and public involvement group to guide research in a complex area.

作者信息

Jewell Amelia, Pritchard Megan, Barrett Katherine, Green Patrick, Markham Sarah, McKenzie Sharon, Oliver Roger, Wan Maria, Downs Johnny, Stewart Robert

机构信息

1South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

2Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Res Involv Engagem. 2019 Jun 11;5:20. doi: 10.1186/s40900-019-0152-4. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1186/s40900-019-0152-4
PMID:31205751
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6558776/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in health and social care research has been shown to improve the quality and relevance of research. PPI in data linkage research is important in ensuring the legitimacy of future health informatics initiatives, but remains sparse and under-developed. This article describes the setting up and evaluation of a service user and carer advisory group with the aim of providing feedback and advice to researchers developing or making use of database linkages in the field of mental health.

AIM

The aim of this study is to describe the creation and formative evaluation of the service user and carer advisory group after a trial period of 12 months.

METHOD

Six individuals were recruited to the group all of whom had personal experience of mental illness. A formative evaluation was conducted after a trial period of 12 months.

RESULTS

Evaluation revealed that the group succeeded in promoting dialogue between service users/carers and researchers. Factors that contributed to the success of the group's first year included the opportunity it provided for researchers to involve service users and carers in their projects, the training provided to group members, and the openness of researchers to receiving feedback from the group.

CONCLUSION

The group encourages the incorporation of PPI in data linkage research which helps to ensure the legitimacy of data linkage practices and governance systems whilst also improving the quality and relevance of the research being conducted using linked data.

摘要

背景

患者及公众参与(PPI)健康与社会护理研究已被证明可提高研究的质量和相关性。数据链接研究中的PPI对于确保未来健康信息学举措的合法性很重要,但仍然稀少且发展不足。本文描述了一个服务使用者和护理者咨询小组的设立与评估,旨在为在心理健康领域开发或使用数据库链接的研究人员提供反馈和建议。

目的

本研究的目的是描述在为期12个月的试验期后服务使用者和护理者咨询小组的创建及形成性评估。

方法

招募了6名小组成员,他们都有精神疾病的个人经历。在为期12个月的试验期后进行了形成性评估。

结果

评估显示该小组成功促进了服务使用者/护理者与研究人员之间的对话。促成该小组第一年成功的因素包括它为研究人员提供了让服务使用者和护理者参与其项目的机会、为小组成员提供的培训,以及研究人员对接受小组反馈的开放性。

结论

该小组鼓励在数据链接研究中纳入PPI,这有助于确保数据链接实践和治理系统的合法性,同时提高使用链接数据进行的研究的质量和相关性。