Burguete Miguel Enrique Eduardo
Instituto de Ciencias de la Vida. Universidad Católica de Valencia San Vicente Mártir. C/ Guillem de Castro 94, 46003, Valencia. España.
Cuad Bioet. 2019 May-Aug;30(99):159-170. doi: 10.30444/CB.30.
This paper links the Sexual Revolution with queer neovitalism, framing both in the emancipatory impulse that underlies European culture. Impulse does not imply the confrontation between tradition and progress, but the confrontation of tradition with itself. After analyzing its epistemological referents of 68, our research shows that the conceptualization of desire as the genuine ″revolutionary instance″ and the synthesis of the relationships between language, power and politics, forged the myth of the Sexual Revolution. In addition, that this, by dissociating the sexual encounter of procreation, inspired the current gender perspective, the culture of performativity and the critique of heteronormativity. Linking the queer perspective with transhumanism, this work reveals the constroversial nature of its neovitalist current and highlines its eugenics and bio-colonial potential. Eugenic and bio-colonial potential that is evidenced by the use of genetic material and foreign bodies as a ″product″ for the social reassignment, as procreator, of the queer collective. Finally, the work reveals the inherent contradiction of the Sexual Revolution, concluding that it did not bring the emancipation that it promised, but that it implied a relapse in the state of nature, in the instinctive centrality that orders praxis to the submission of the environment, propitiating a new form of social control and a new conformity.
本文将性革命与酷儿新活力论联系起来,将两者置于欧洲文化背后的解放冲动之中。冲动并非意味着传统与进步之间的对抗,而是传统自身的对抗。在分析了其68个认识论参照点后,我们的研究表明,将欲望概念化为真正的“革命实例”以及语言、权力和政治之间关系的综合,铸就了性革命的神话。此外,通过将性与生育相分离,它激发了当前的性别视角、表演性文化以及对异性恋规范的批判。将酷儿视角与超人类主义联系起来,这项工作揭示了其新活力论潮流的争议性本质,并突出了其优生学和生物殖民潜力。这种优生学和生物殖民潜力体现在将遗传物质和异物用作一种“产品”,用于酷儿群体作为社会再分配的“生产者”。最后这项工作揭示了性革命的内在矛盾,得出结论认为,它并未带来它所承诺的解放,而是意味着回归自然状态,回归那种将实践命令为服从环境的本能中心地位,从而促成了一种新的社会控制形式和新的顺从。