Key Laboratory of Imaging Diagnosis and Minimally Invasive Intervention Research, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University/Affiliated Lishui Hospital of Zhejiang University/Lishui Central Hospital, Lishui, China.
Department of Radiology, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University/Affiliated Lishui Hospital of Zhejiang University/Lishui Central Hospital, Lishui, China.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019 Oct;147(1):29-35. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12888. Epub 2019 Aug 18.
To investigate the short-term efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting beads (DEB-TACE) versus synchronous radiochemotherapy among women with cervical cancer.
A retrospective cohort study of women treated by synchronous radiochemotherapy (n=20) and DEB-TACE (n=20) at a single center in China between November 2015 and September 2017. Inclusion criteria were pathologic diagnosis of cervical cancer, age at least 18 years, and complete clinicopathologic information. Hospital stay, direct medical cost, resection frequency, adverse events, treatment responses, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between treatments.
There was no difference in treatment responses, PFS, or OS between the two groups. Hospital stay was shorter, direct medical costs were lower, and resection rate was higher in the DEB-TACE group than in the radiochemotherapy group (all P<0.05). In univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis, no factor was associated with complete response. No predictive factor for PFS or OS was identified by Cox proportional regression analysis. Fewer adverse advents were recorded in the DEB-TACE group than in the synchronous radiochemotherapy group.
Among women with cervical cancer, DEB-TACE achieved equal short-term efficacy, better tolerance, less hospital stay and medical costs, and higher resection rates as compared with synchronous radiochemotherapy.
研究载药微球动脉化疗栓塞术(DEB-TACE)与同步放化疗治疗宫颈癌患者的短期疗效和安全性。
本研究为回顾性队列研究,纳入 2015 年 11 月至 2017 年 9 月在中国某单一中心接受同步放化疗(n=20)和 DEB-TACE(n=20)治疗的宫颈癌患者。纳入标准:经病理诊断为宫颈癌、年龄至少 18 岁且具有完整的临床病理信息。比较两种治疗方法的住院时间、直接医疗费用、切除频率、不良事件、治疗反应、无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。
两组患者的治疗反应、PFS 和 OS 无差异。DEB-TACE 组的住院时间更短、直接医疗费用更低、切除率更高(均 P<0.05)。单因素和多因素 logistic 回归分析均表明,无因素与完全缓解相关。Cox 比例风险回归分析未发现 PFS 或 OS 的预测因素。DEB-TACE 组的不良事件发生率低于同步放化疗组。
在宫颈癌患者中,与同步放化疗相比,DEB-TACE 具有同等的短期疗效,更好的耐受性,更短的住院时间和更低的医疗费用,以及更高的切除率。